Already have an account? Sign in instead.
You stay signed in for 30 days on this browser.
Continue with Google Continue with MicrosoftNo account yet? Create a free one.
We sent a six-digit code.
It expires in ten minutes, works once, and only in this browser. Five wrong tries void it. Send another code.
Your account is live and the Cloudflare checks are off for this browser.
6 Illinois opinions name it 2 courts 2004–2011 0 in the last five years
The cases below were cited by Illinois courts in a sentence that names this issue. Sides come from how each citing opinion treated the case (Syfertize flag on that citation), so a case can appear on both: that is where the law is contested. A red or yellow chip is the case's own overall treatment.
| Case | Followed | Cited |
|---|---|---|
| No positive-treatment citations attached to this issue in Illinois. | ||
| Case | Negative | Cited |
|---|---|---|
| No negative-treatment citations attached to this issue in Illinois. Read the followed side critically anyway. | ||
| Case | Cited | Years |
|---|---|---|
In Re Illinois Bell Switching Station Litigation
green
2 sentences2011Illinois Bell Switching Station, 161 Ill.2d at 242-43 , 204 Ill.Dec. 216 , 641 N.E.2d 440 . ¶ 31 In rejecting the plaintiffs' argument, the Illinois Bell Switching Station court noted that Illinois Bell's tariff listed among its general regulations a service interruption exclusion. 2011Illinois Bell Switching Station, 161 Ill. 2d at 242-43 . ¶ 31 In rejecting the plaintiffs’ argument, the Illinois Bell Switching Station court noted that Illinois Bell’s tariff listed among its general regulations a service interruption exclusion. | 6 | 2004–2011 |
Counted by distinct opinions that both name this issue and are annotated to the section; sections every opinion cites regardless of issue are not filtered here, so read the counts against the total above.
Opinions by the citing court's state. A doctrine retained in one state and abandoned in another shows up here as a year span that stalls.