Already have an account? Sign in instead.
You stay signed in for 30 days on this browser.
Continue with Google Continue with MicrosoftNo account yet? Create a free one.
We sent a six-digit code.
It expires in ten minutes, works once, and only in this browser. Five wrong tries void it. Send another code.
Your account is live and the Cloudflare checks are off for this browser.
6 Indiana opinions name it 2 courts 1999–2016 0 in the last five years
The cases below were cited by Indiana courts in a sentence that names this issue. Sides come from how each citing opinion treated the case (Syfertize flag on that citation), so a case can appear on both: that is where the law is contested. A red or yellow chip is the case's own overall treatment.
| Case | Followed | Cited |
|---|---|---|
Dannie Carl Pattison v. State of Indianagreen1 sentence2016Pattison v. State, 54 N.E.3d 361, 365 (Ind. 2016). | 1 | 1 |
Lisa J. Kane v. State of Indianagreen1 sentence2014Kane v. State, 976 N.E.2d 1228, 1231 (Ind. 2012). | 1 | 1 |
Michael Inman v. State of Indianagreen1 sentence2014Inman v. State, 4 N.E.3d 190, 200 (Ind. 2014). | 1 | 1 |
Ham v. Stategreen2 sentences2008As the State correctly notes, when addressing a claim of instructional error, we determine whether the instructions “as a whole, misstate the law or otherwise mislead the jury.” Ham v. State, 826 N.E.2d 640, 641 (Ind.2005). 2008As the State correctly notes, when addressing a claim of instructional error, we determine whether the instructions "as a whole, misstate the law or otherwise mislead the jury." Ham v. State, 826 N.E.2d 640, 641 (Ind.2005). | 1 | 1 |
Kevin A. Conner v. Daniel McBride Superintendentgreen1 sentence2005See Conner v. McBride, 375 F.3d at 666-68 . | 1 | 1 |
Conner v. Stategreen2 sentences2005See Conner, 711 N.E.2d at 1246-47 (discussing procedural default with respect to instructional error); id. at 1250 (rejecting on the merits Conner's related claim of substandard performance by his lawyers). 2005See Conner, 711 N.E.2d at 1246-47 (discussing procedural default with respect to instructional error); id. at 1250 (rejecting on the merits Conner's related claim of substandard performance by his lawyers). | 1 | 1 |
| Case | Negative | Cited |
|---|---|---|
| No negative-treatment citations attached to this issue in Indiana. Read the followed side critically anyway. | ||
| Case | Cited | Years |
|---|---|---|
Scisney v. State
green
1 sentence1999However, in Scisney v. State, 701 N.E.2d 847 (Ind.1998), our supreme court addressed the issue of whether a party must tender an alternative, substitute written instruction in order to preserve a claim of instructional error. | 1 | 1999–1999 |
Opinions by the citing court's state. A doctrine retained in one state and abandoned in another shows up here as a year span that stalls.