Already have an account? Sign in instead.
You stay signed in for 30 days on this browser.
Continue with Google Continue with MicrosoftNo account yet? Create a free one.
We sent a six-digit code.
It expires in ten minutes, works once, and only in this browser. Five wrong tries void it. Send another code.
Your account is live and the Cloudflare checks are off for this browser.
6 Indiana opinions name it 2 courts 1935–2014 0 in the last five years
The cases below were cited by Indiana courts in a sentence that names this issue. Sides come from how each citing opinion treated the case (Syfertize flag on that citation), so a case can appear on both: that is where the law is contested. A red or yellow chip is the case's own overall treatment.
| Case | Followed | Cited |
|---|---|---|
McGee v. Stategreen1 sentence2014See Osborne v. State, 754 N.E.2d 916, 925 (Ind. 2001) (upholding defendant’s conviction for attempted murder where the defendant struck the victim approximately seven times in the head and face with an iron bar and hammer); McGee v. State, 699 N.E.2d 264, 266 (Ind. 1998) (upholding defendant’s conviction for attempted murder where the defendant stated that he was going to kill the victim, beat the defendant 17 with a baseball bat, and held the defendant down so that his co-defendant could attack the victim). | 1 | 1 |
Osborne v. Stategreen1 sentence2014See Osborne v. State, 754 N.E.2d 916, 925 (Ind. 2001) (upholding defendant’s conviction for attempted murder where the defendant struck the victim approximately seven times in the head and face with an iron bar and hammer); McGee v. State, 699 N.E.2d 264, 266 (Ind. 1998) (upholding defendant’s conviction for attempted murder where the defendant stated that he was going to kill the victim, beat the defendant 17 with a baseball bat, and held the defendant down so that his co-defendant could attack the victim). | 1 | 1 |
| Case | Negative | Cited |
|---|---|---|
| No negative-treatment citations attached to this issue in Indiana. Read the followed side critically anyway. | ||
| Case | Cited | Years |
|---|---|---|
Link v. State
neutral
2 sentences1978While it is not sufficient to show that a defendant has placed a foot partially inside a door, [Link v. State (1953), 232 Ind. 466 , 113 N.E.2d 43 ] or inserted an iron bar between the jam (sic) and the door, [Mattox v. State (1913), 179 Ind. 575 , 101 N.E. 1009 ], a showing that defendant has leaned through a window to enable him to take money from a jukebox is sufficient to establish the element of entry. 1978While it is not sufficient to show that a defendant has placed a foot partially inside a door, [Link v. State (1953), 232 Ind. 466 , 113 N.E.2d 43 ] or inserted an iron bar between the jam (sic) and the door, [Mattox v. State (1913), 179 Ind. 575 , 101 N.E. 1009 ], a showing that defendant has leaned through a window to enable him to take money from a jukebox is sufficient to establish the element of entry. | 2 | 1975–1978 |
Mattox v. State
green
2 sentences1978While it is not sufficient to show that a defendant has placed a foot partially inside a door, [Link v. State (1953), 232 Ind. 466 , 113 N.E.2d 43 ] or inserted an iron bar between the jam (sic) and the door, [Mattox v. State (1913), 179 Ind. 575 , 101 N.E. 1009 ], a showing that defendant has leaned through a window to enable him to take money from a jukebox is sufficient to establish the element of entry. 1978While it is not sufficient to show that a defendant has placed a foot partially inside a door, [Link v. State (1953), 232 Ind. 466 , 113 N.E.2d 43 ] or inserted an iron bar between the jam (sic) and the door, [Mattox v. State (1913), 179 Ind. 575 , 101 N.E. 1009 ], a showing that defendant has leaned through a window to enable him to take money from a jukebox is sufficient to establish the element of entry. | 2 | 1975–1978 |
Inland Steel Co. v. Flannery
neutral
2 sentences1999E.g., Gordon, 585 N.E.2d 1362 (injuries caused by foreman’s punch to employee’s face held "by accident”); Arrow Uniform Rental, 545 N.E.2d 832 (injuries received through sexual assault of one employee by another held "by accident"); Fields, 540 N.E.2d 631 (injuries caused by sexual harassment of employee by her supervisor were "by accident”); Shelby, 533 N.E.2d 1296 (injuries caused by one employee's sticking a red-hot metal rod in groin of fellow employee held "by accident”); Inland Steel Co., 88 Ind.App. 347 , 163 N.E. 841 (injury totally disabling employee that resulted from altercation wit 1999E.g., Gordon, 585 N.E.2d 1362 (injuries caused by foreman’s punch to employee’s face held "by accident”); Arrow Uniform Rental, 545 N.E.2d 832 (injuries received through sexual assault of one employee by another held "by accident"); Fields, 540 N.E.2d 631 (injuries caused by sexual harassment of employee by her supervisor were "by accident”); Shelby, 533 N.E.2d 1296 (injuries caused by one employee's sticking a red-hot metal rod in groin of fellow employee held "by accident”); Inland Steel Co., 88 Ind.App. 347 , 163 N.E. 841 (injury totally disabling employee that resulted from altercation wit | 1 | 1999–1999 |
Furst Kerber Cut Stone Co. v. Mayo
neutral
2 sentences1999E.g., Gordon, 585 N.E.2d 1362 (injuries caused by foreman’s punch to employee’s face held "by accident”); Arrow Uniform Rental, 545 N.E.2d 832 (injuries received through sexual assault of one employee by another held "by accident"); Fields, 540 N.E.2d 631 (injuries caused by sexual harassment of employee by her supervisor were "by accident”); Shelby, 533 N.E.2d 1296 (injuries caused by one employee's sticking a red-hot metal rod in groin of fellow employee held "by accident”); Inland Steel Co., 88 Ind.App. 347 , 163 N.E. 841 (injury totally disabling employee that resulted from altercation wit 1999E.g., Gordon, 585 N.E.2d 1362 (injuries caused by foreman’s punch to employee’s face held "by accident”); Arrow Uniform Rental, 545 N.E.2d 832 (injuries received through sexual assault of one employee by another held "by accident"); Fields, 540 N.E.2d 631 (injuries caused by sexual harassment of employee by her supervisor were "by accident”); Shelby, 533 N.E.2d 1296 (injuries caused by one employee's sticking a red-hot metal rod in groin of fellow employee held "by accident”); Inland Steel Co., 88 Ind.App. 347 , 163 N.E. 841 (injury totally disabling employee that resulted from altercation wit | 1 | 1999–1999 |
Shelby v. Truck & Bus Group Division of General Motors Corp.
green
1 sentence1999E.g., Gordon, 585 N.E.2d 1362 (injuries caused by foreman’s punch to employee’s face held "by accident”); Arrow Uniform Rental, 545 N.E.2d 832 (injuries received through sexual assault of one employee by another held "by accident"); Fields, 540 N.E.2d 631 (injuries caused by sexual harassment of employee by her supervisor were "by accident”); Shelby, 533 N.E.2d 1296 (injuries caused by one employee's sticking a red-hot metal rod in groin of fellow employee held "by accident”); Inland Steel Co., 88 Ind.App. 347 , 163 N.E. 841 (injury totally disabling employee that resulted from altercation wit | 1 | 1999–1999 |
Gordon v. Chrysler Motor Corp.
green
1 sentence1999E.g., Gordon, 585 N.E.2d 1362 (injuries caused by foreman’s punch to employee’s face held "by accident”); Arrow Uniform Rental, 545 N.E.2d 832 (injuries received through sexual assault of one employee by another held "by accident"); Fields, 540 N.E.2d 631 (injuries caused by sexual harassment of employee by her supervisor were "by accident”); Shelby, 533 N.E.2d 1296 (injuries caused by one employee's sticking a red-hot metal rod in groin of fellow employee held "by accident”); Inland Steel Co., 88 Ind.App. 347 , 163 N.E. 841 (injury totally disabling employee that resulted from altercation wit | 1 | 1999–1999 |
Fields v. Cummins Employees Federal Credit Union
green
1 sentence1999E.g., Gordon, 585 N.E.2d 1362 (injuries caused by foreman’s punch to employee’s face held "by accident”); Arrow Uniform Rental, 545 N.E.2d 832 (injuries received through sexual assault of one employee by another held "by accident"); Fields, 540 N.E.2d 631 (injuries caused by sexual harassment of employee by her supervisor were "by accident”); Shelby, 533 N.E.2d 1296 (injuries caused by one employee's sticking a red-hot metal rod in groin of fellow employee held "by accident”); Inland Steel Co., 88 Ind.App. 347 , 163 N.E. 841 (injury totally disabling employee that resulted from altercation wit | 1 | 1999–1999 |
Arrow Uniform Rental, Inc. v. Suter
green
1 sentence1999E.g., Gordon, 585 N.E.2d 1362 (injuries caused by foreman’s punch to employee’s face held "by accident”); Arrow Uniform Rental, 545 N.E.2d 832 (injuries received through sexual assault of one employee by another held "by accident"); Fields, 540 N.E.2d 631 (injuries caused by sexual harassment of employee by her supervisor were "by accident”); Shelby, 533 N.E.2d 1296 (injuries caused by one employee's sticking a red-hot metal rod in groin of fellow employee held "by accident”); Inland Steel Co., 88 Ind.App. 347 , 163 N.E. 841 (injury totally disabling employee that resulted from altercation wit | 1 | 1999–1999 |
Mueller v. Klingman
green
2 sentences1999E.g., Gordon, 585 N.E.2d 1362 (injuries caused by foreman’s punch to employee’s face held "by accident”); Arrow Uniform Rental, 545 N.E.2d 832 (injuries received through sexual assault of one employee by another held "by accident"); Fields, 540 N.E.2d 631 (injuries caused by sexual harassment of employee by her supervisor were "by accident”); Shelby, 533 N.E.2d 1296 (injuries caused by one employee's sticking a red-hot metal rod in groin of fellow employee held "by accident”); Inland Steel Co., 88 Ind.App. 347 , 163 N.E. 841 (injury totally disabling employee that resulted from altercation wit 1999E.g., Gordon, 585 N.E.2d 1362 (injuries caused by foreman’s punch to employee’s face held "by accident”); Arrow Uniform Rental, 545 N.E.2d 832 (injuries received through sexual assault of one employee by another held "by accident"); Fields, 540 N.E.2d 631 (injuries caused by sexual harassment of employee by her supervisor were "by accident”); Shelby, 533 N.E.2d 1296 (injuries caused by one employee's sticking a red-hot metal rod in groin of fellow employee held "by accident”); Inland Steel Co., 88 Ind.App. 347 , 163 N.E. 841 (injury totally disabling employee that resulted from altercation wit | 1 | 1999–1999 |
Payne v. Wall
green
2 sentences1999E.g., Gordon, 585 N.E.2d 1362 (injuries caused by foreman’s punch to employee’s face held "by accident”); Arrow Uniform Rental, 545 N.E.2d 832 (injuries received through sexual assault of one employee by another held "by accident"); Fields, 540 N.E.2d 631 (injuries caused by sexual harassment of employee by her supervisor were "by accident”); Shelby, 533 N.E.2d 1296 (injuries caused by one employee's sticking a red-hot metal rod in groin of fellow employee held "by accident”); Inland Steel Co., 88 Ind.App. 347 , 163 N.E. 841 (injury totally disabling employee that resulted from altercation wit 1999E.g., Gordon, 585 N.E.2d 1362 (injuries caused by foreman’s punch to employee’s face held "by accident”); Arrow Uniform Rental, 545 N.E.2d 832 (injuries received through sexual assault of one employee by another held "by accident"); Fields, 540 N.E.2d 631 (injuries caused by sexual harassment of employee by her supervisor were "by accident”); Shelby, 533 N.E.2d 1296 (injuries caused by one employee's sticking a red-hot metal rod in groin of fellow employee held "by accident”); Inland Steel Co., 88 Ind.App. 347 , 163 N.E. 841 (injury totally disabling employee that resulted from altercation wit | 1 | 1999–1999 |
Bell's Gap Railroad v. Pennsylvania
green
2 sentences1977In Bell’s Gap Railroad Co. v. Pennsylvania, (1890) 134 U.S. 232, 237 , 10 S.Ct. 533, 535 , 33 L.Ed. 892 , in words often quoted, the Supreme Court of the United States said: “The provision in the Fourteenth Amendment, that no state shall deny to any person within its jurisdiction the equal protection of the laws, was not intended to prevent a state from adjusting its system of taxation in all proper and reasonable ways. * * We think that we are safe in saying that the Fourteenth Amendment was not intended to compel the state to adopt an iron rule of equal taxation.” And in Allied Stores of Ohi 1977In Bell’s Gap Railroad Co. v. Pennsylvania, (1890) 134 U.S. 232, 237 , 10 S.Ct. 533, 535 , 33 L.Ed. 892 , in words often quoted, the Supreme Court of the United States said: “The provision in the Fourteenth Amendment, that no state shall deny to any person within its jurisdiction the equal protection of the laws, was not intended to prevent a state from adjusting its system of taxation in all proper and reasonable ways. * * We think that we are safe in saying that the Fourteenth Amendment was not intended to compel the state to adopt an iron rule of equal taxation.” And in Allied Stores of Ohi | 1 | 1977–1977 |
Allied Stores of Ohio, Inc. v. Bowers
green
2 sentences1977In Bell’s Gap Railroad Co. v. Pennsylvania, (1890) 134 U.S. 232, 237 , 10 S.Ct. 533, 535 , 33 L.Ed. 892 , in words often quoted, the Supreme Court of the United States said: “The provision in the Fourteenth Amendment, that no state shall deny to any person within its jurisdiction the equal protection of the laws, was not intended to prevent a state from adjusting its system of taxation in all proper and reasonable ways. * * We think that we are safe in saying that the Fourteenth Amendment was not intended to compel the state to adopt an iron rule of equal taxation.” And in Allied Stores of Ohi 1977In Bell’s Gap Railroad Co. v. Pennsylvania, (1890) 134 U.S. 232, 237 , 10 S.Ct. 533, 535 , 33 L.Ed. 892 , in words often quoted, the Supreme Court of the United States said: “The provision in the Fourteenth Amendment, that no state shall deny to any person within its jurisdiction the equal protection of the laws, was not intended to prevent a state from adjusting its system of taxation in all proper and reasonable ways. * * We think that we are safe in saying that the Fourteenth Amendment was not intended to compel the state to adopt an iron rule of equal taxation.” And in Allied Stores of Ohi | 1 | 1977–1977 |
Pacific Express Co. v. Seibert
green
1 sentence1935It is enough that there is no discrimination in favor, of one as against another of the same class.” See also Pacific Express Co. v. Seibert (1892), 142 U. S. 339 , 12 Sup. Ct. 250. | 1 | 1935–1935 |
Giozza v. Tiernan
green
1 sentence1935We think we are safe in saying, that the 14th Amendment was not intended to compel the State to adopt an iron rule of equal taxation.” And again in the case of Giozza v. Tiernan (1893), 148 U. S. 657, 662 , 13 Sup. Ct. 721, the court said: “Nor, in respect of taxation was the amendment intended to compel the State to adopt an iron rule of equality; to prevent the classification of property for taxation at different rates; or to prohibit legislation in that regard, special either in the extent to which it operates or the objects sought to be obtained by it. | 1 | 1935–1935 |
Opinions by the citing court's state. A doctrine retained in one state and abandoned in another shows up here as a year span that stalls.