Already have an account? Sign in instead.
You stay signed in for 30 days on this browser.
Continue with Google Continue with MicrosoftNo account yet? Create a free one.
We sent a six-digit code.
It expires in ten minutes, works once, and only in this browser. Five wrong tries void it. Send another code.
Your account is live and the Cloudflare checks are off for this browser.
6 Indiana opinions name it 3 courts 1990–2012 0 in the last five years
The cases below were cited by Indiana courts in a sentence that names this issue. Sides come from how each citing opinion treated the case (Syfertize flag on that citation), so a case can appear on both: that is where the law is contested. A red or yellow chip is the case's own overall treatment.
| Case | Followed | Cited |
|---|---|---|
Hatcher v. Indiana State Board of Tax Commissionersgreen2 sentences1999See Barth, Inc. v. State Bd. of Tax Comm’rs, 699 N.E.2d 800, 802 ; see also Hatcher v. State Bd. of Tax Comm’rs, 561 N.E.2d 852, 857 (Ind.Tax Ct.1990). 1997Hatcher, 561 N.E.2d at 852 . | 1 | 2 |
Barth, Inc. v. State Board of Tax Commissionersgreen1 sentence1999See Barth, Inc. v. State Bd. of Tax Comm’rs, 699 N.E.2d 800, 802 ; see also Hatcher v. State Bd. of Tax Comm’rs, 561 N.E.2d 852, 857 (Ind.Tax Ct.1990). | 1 | 1 |
| Case | Negative | Cited |
|---|---|---|
| No negative-treatment citations attached to this issue in Indiana. Read the followed side critically anyway. | ||
| Case | Cited | Years |
|---|---|---|
Board of School Commissioners v. Bender
green
2 sentences2012The School cites to Bender, 36 Ind.App. 164 , 72 N.E. 154 , and argues that the opinion is not applicable due to its age, the fact that it pre-dated the current public bidding statute, “the relief offered is equitable,” and that the case is distinguishable because it concerned a mathematical error and not “procrastination and carelessness.” Appellant’s Brief at 12. 2012The School cites to Bender, 36 Ind.App. 164 , 72 N.E. 154 , and argues that the opinion is not applicable due to its age, the fact that it pre-dated the current public bidding statute, “the relief offered is equitable,” and that the case is distinguishable because it concerned a mathematical error and not “procrastination and carelessness.” Appellant’s Brief at 12. | 2 | 2012–2012 |
Liebherr Crane Corporation v. The United States
green
1 sentence2012Id. 6 See also Harrison, David B., Right of Bidder for State or Municipal Contract to Rescind Bid on Ground that Bid was Based upon His Own Mistake or that of His Employee, 2 A.L.R.4th 991 (discussing the right to rescind a bid for a mistake of fact, such as a mathematical error). 9 Here, the School provided notice to bidders that bids would be received until February 5, 2008, at 2:00 p.m. and that the bids would be publicly opened at 2:00 p.m. | 1 | 2012–2012 |
Foust v. Aetna Casualty & Insurance Co.
green
2 sentences1993Co. (1989), Colo.App., 786 P.2d 450, 451-52 . 1993Co. (1989), Colo. App., 786 P.2d 450, 451-52 . | 1 | 1993–1993 |
Marion County Sheriff's Merit Board v. Peoples Broadcasting Corp.
green
1 sentence1990In addition, Instructional Bulletin 84-7 provides: Example (c) A correction is not available for claimed errors in judgment, such as incorrect determinations of grade, percentage of completion, or age of a structure. (§ II{(A)4(c) at 4.) To ascertain the legislature's intent, the words "mathematical error in computing an assessment" should be read in their plain, ordinary and usual sense, "unless a contrary purpose is clearly shown by the statute itself." Marion County Sheriff's Merit Bd. v. Peoples Broadcasting Corp. (1989), Ind., 547 N.E.2d 235, 237 ; IC 1-1-4 1. | 1 | 1990–1990 |
Opinions by the citing court's state. A doctrine retained in one state and abandoned in another shows up here as a year span that stalls.