Already have an account? Sign in instead.
You stay signed in for 30 days on this browser.
Continue with Google Continue with MicrosoftNo account yet? Create a free one.
We sent a six-digit code.
It expires in ten minutes, works once, and only in this browser. Five wrong tries void it. Send another code.
Your account is live and the Cloudflare checks are off for this browser.
6 Indiana opinions name it 3 courts 1855–1994 0 in the last five years
The cases below were cited by Indiana courts in a sentence that names this issue. Sides come from how each citing opinion treated the case (Syfertize flag on that citation), so a case can appear on both: that is where the law is contested. A red or yellow chip is the case's own overall treatment.
| Case | Followed | Cited |
|---|---|---|
Vanderburgh County Board of Commissioners v. Rittenhousegreen1 sentence1994See Vanderburgh County Bd. of Comm'rs v. Rittenhouse (1991), Ind.App., 575 N.E.2d 663, 666 (citing Hills 416 N.E.2d at 462 ). | 1 | 1 |
Hills v. AREA PLAN COM'N OF VERMILLION CTY.green1 sentence1994See Vanderburgh County Bd. of Comm'rs v. Rittenhouse (1991), Ind.App., 575 N.E.2d 663, 666 (citing Hills 416 N.E.2d at 462 ). | 1 | 1 |
| Case | Negative | Cited |
|---|---|---|
| No negative-treatment citations attached to this issue in Indiana. Read the followed side critically anyway. | ||
| Case | Cited | Years |
|---|---|---|
Lang v. Scott
neutral
2 sentences1930The provisions in the statute here invqlved, pertain to a new right — that of the construction, etc., of any public work, with an adequate remedy for its violation, and the Lang case expressly holds that: “If a statute is introductory of new rights which did not before exist in the country, and prescribes a penalty for their violation, the persons claiming under the act must depend, for the security of the rights thus claimed, upon the provisions therein specified.” In Butler v. State (1855), 6 Ind. 165, 168 , the court, approving Lang v. Scott, supra, thus states the rule: “When a new right i 1855Lang v. Scott, 1 Blackf. 405.—Almy v. Harris, 5 J. | 2 | 1855–1930 |
Evansville & Terre Haute Railroad v. Hoffman
neutral
2 sentences1983If the party complaining of the instruction produced evidence supporting his position, but the jury misunderstanding the law because of their reliance on the erroneous instruction rendered a verdict adverse to the complaining party, then it cannot be said the error in the giving of the instruction was rendered harmless because the verdict was "right" or "clearly right." See, Louisville and Southern Indiana Traction Company v. Cotner, (1919) 71 Ind.App. 377 , 125 N.E. 78 ; Diffenderfer v. City of Jeffersonville, (1917) 67 Ind.App. 10 , 118 N.E. 836 ; Evansville and Terre Haute Rail road Company 1983If the party complaining of the instruction produced evidence supporting his position, but the jury misunderstanding the law because of their reliance on the erroneous instruction rendered a verdict adverse to the complaining party, then it cannot be said the error in the giving of the instruction was rendered harmless because the verdict was "right" or "clearly right." See, Louisville and Southern Indiana Traction Company v. Cotner, (1919) 71 Ind.App. 377 , 125 N.E. 78 ; Diffenderfer v. City of Jeffersonville, (1917) 67 Ind.App. 10 , 118 N.E. 836 ; Evansville and Terre Haute Rail road Company | 1 | 1983–1983 |
Diffenderfer v. City of Jeffersonville
green
2 sentences1983If the party complaining of the instruction produced evidence supporting his position, but the jury misunderstanding the law because of their reliance on the erroneous instruction rendered a verdict adverse to the complaining party, then it cannot be said the error in the giving of the instruction was rendered harmless because the verdict was "right" or "clearly right." See, Louisville and Southern Indiana Traction Company v. Cotner, (1919) 71 Ind.App. 377 , 125 N.E. 78 ; Diffenderfer v. City of Jeffersonville, (1917) 67 Ind.App. 10 , 118 N.E. 836 ; Evansville and Terre Haute Rail road Company 1983If the party complaining of the instruction produced evidence supporting his position, but the jury misunderstanding the law because of their reliance on the erroneous instruction rendered a verdict adverse to the complaining party, then it cannot be said the error in the giving of the instruction was rendered harmless because the verdict was "right" or "clearly right." See, Louisville and Southern Indiana Traction Company v. Cotner, (1919) 71 Ind.App. 377 , 125 N.E. 78 ; Diffenderfer v. City of Jeffersonville, (1917) 67 Ind.App. 10 , 118 N.E. 836 ; Evansville and Terre Haute Rail road Company | 1 | 1983–1983 |
Louisville & Southern Indiana Traction Co. v. Cotner
neutral
2 sentences1983If the party complaining of the instruction produced evidence supporting his position, but the jury misunderstanding the law because of their reliance on the erroneous instruction rendered a verdict adverse to the complaining party, then it cannot be said the error in the giving of the instruction was rendered harmless because the verdict was "right" or "clearly right." See, Louisville and Southern Indiana Traction Company v. Cotner, (1919) 71 Ind.App. 377 , 125 N.E. 78 ; Diffenderfer v. City of Jeffersonville, (1917) 67 Ind.App. 10 , 118 N.E. 836 ; Evansville and Terre Haute Rail road Company 1983If the party complaining of the instruction produced evidence supporting his position, but the jury misunderstanding the law because of their reliance on the erroneous instruction rendered a verdict adverse to the complaining party, then it cannot be said the error in the giving of the instruction was rendered harmless because the verdict was "right" or "clearly right." See, Louisville and Southern Indiana Traction Company v. Cotner, (1919) 71 Ind.App. 377 , 125 N.E. 78 ; Diffenderfer v. City of Jeffersonville, (1917) 67 Ind.App. 10 , 118 N.E. 836 ; Evansville and Terre Haute Rail road Company | 1 | 1983–1983 |
Jones, Rec. v. Lathrop-Moyer Co.
neutral
2 sentences1978Jones v. Lathrop-Moyer Company (1934), 99 Ind. App. 127 , 190 N.E. 883 . 1978Jones v. Lathrop-Moyer Company (1934), 99 Ind. App. 127 , 190 N.E. 883 . | 1 | 1978–1978 |
Dull v. State
green
2 sentences1964Dull v. State (1962), 242 Ind. 633, 638 , 180 N. E. 2d 523, 525 . 1964Dull v. State (1962), 242 Ind. 633, 638 , 180 N. E. 2d 523, 525 . | 1 | 1964–1964 |
Butler v. State
neutral
1 sentence1930The provisions in the statute here invqlved, pertain to a new right — that of the construction, etc., of any public work, with an adequate remedy for its violation, and the Lang case expressly holds that: “If a statute is introductory of new rights which did not before exist in the country, and prescribes a penalty for their violation, the persons claiming under the act must depend, for the security of the rights thus claimed, upon the provisions therein specified.” In Butler v. State (1855), 6 Ind. 165, 168 , the court, approving Lang v. Scott, supra, thus states the rule: “When a new right i | 1 | 1930–1930 |
Zellers v. State
neutral
1 sentence1930The provisions in the statute here invqlved, pertain to a new right — that of the construction, etc., of any public work, with an adequate remedy for its violation, and the Lang case expressly holds that: “If a statute is introductory of new rights which did not before exist in the country, and prescribes a penalty for their violation, the persons claiming under the act must depend, for the security of the rights thus claimed, upon the provisions therein specified.” In Butler v. State (1855), 6 Ind. 165, 168 , the court, approving Lang v. Scott, supra, thus states the rule: “When a new right i | 1 | 1930–1930 |
City of Greencastle v. Allen
neutral
1 sentence1930The provisions in the statute here invqlved, pertain to a new right — that of the construction, etc., of any public work, with an adequate remedy for its violation, and the Lang case expressly holds that: “If a statute is introductory of new rights which did not before exist in the country, and prescribes a penalty for their violation, the persons claiming under the act must depend, for the security of the rights thus claimed, upon the provisions therein specified.” In Butler v. State (1855), 6 Ind. 165, 168 , the court, approving Lang v. Scott, supra, thus states the rule: “When a new right i | 1 | 1930–1930 |
Storms v. Stevens
green
1 sentence1930In Storms v. Stevens (1885), 104 Ind. 46 , 37 N. E. 401 , a ditch was constructed by the county commissioners under §§4285 et seq., R. | 1 | 1930–1930 |
Scanlin v. Stewart
neutral
1 sentence1930In Storms v. Stevens (1885), 104 Ind. 46 , 37 N. E. 401 , a ditch was constructed by the county commissioners under §§4285 et seq., R. | 1 | 1930–1930 |
Opinions by the citing court's state. A doctrine retained in one state and abandoned in another shows up here as a year span that stalls.