Perry claim (Indiana) · Go Syfert
← Indiana issues

Perry claim in Indiana

6 Indiana opinions name it 1 courts 1992–2024 1 in the last five years

The cases below were cited by Indiana courts in a sentence that names this issue. Sides come from how each citing opinion treated the case (Syfertize flag on that citation), so a case can appear on both: that is where the law is contested. A red or yellow chip is the case's own overall treatment.

Followed or applied (3)

CaseFollowedCited
Mullane v. Central Hanover Bank & Trust Co.green
scotus · 1950 · cited in 1 Indiana opinions naming this issue, 2024–2024
1 sentence

2024Hanover Bank & Trust Co., 339 U.S. 306, 314 (1950)). [32] The trial court’s order denying Perry’s motion to set aside the judgment against her indicated: “A Motion for Order for Return of Estate Funds was filed, and Imogene Perry was notified by certified mail of the motion and hearing, as set forth in the Court’s Order on Hearing of December 28, 2021[.]” (Appellant’s App. Vol. 2 at 13.) That order on the December 28, 2021, hearing included a finding that: “Perry received notice of the hearing via certified mail.

11
Ben-Yisrayl v. Stategreen
ind · 2000 · cited in 1 Indiana opinions naming this issue, 2015–2015
1 sentence

2015The doctrine of res judicata prevents the repetitious litigation of that which is essentially the same dispute. [Ben-Yisrayl v. State, 738 N.E.2d 253, 258 (Ind. 2000)].

11
Perry v. Stategreen
ind · 1989 · cited in 1 Indiana opinions naming this issue, 2008–2008
2 sentences

2008In Perry v. State, 541 N.E.2d 913, 919 (Ind. 1989), our supreme court rejected Perry's claim that his $62,000 bond was excessive.

2008In Perry v. State, 541 N.E.2d 913, 919 (Ind.1989), our supreme court rejected Perry’s claim that his $62,000 bond was excessive.

11

Distinguished, questioned or overruled (0)

CaseNegativeCited
No negative-treatment citations attached to this issue in Indiana. Read the followed side critically anyway.

Also cited on this issue (5)

CaseCitedYears
Robinson v. State green
ind · 2004
1 sentence

2015Id.

12015–2015
Perry v. Stitzer Buick GMC, Inc. green
ind · 1994
1 sentence

2001Id.

12001–2001
Cambridge v. State green
ind · 1984
1 sentence

1993Washington v. State (1991), Ind., 570 N.E.2d 21 ; Cambridge v. State (1984), Ind., 468 N.E.2d 1047 .

11993–1993
Washington v. State green
ind · 1991
1 sentence

1993Washington v. State (1991), Ind., 570 N.E.2d 21 ; Cambridge v. State (1984), Ind., 468 N.E.2d 1047 .

11993–1993
George J. Luddington v. Indiana Bell Telephone Company green
ca7 · 1992
1 sentence

1992Although not mentioned in Perry's brief, we note Perry's counsel recently lost this exact argument in Luddington v. Indiana Bell Telephone Company (7th Cir.1992), 966 F.2d 225 .

11992–1992

Where else courts name it

ID 43 (2010–2025) TX 29 (1986–2026) AL 16 (1995–2005) OH 13 (2004–2023) CA 10 (1982–2021) PA 6 (1980–2014) FL 6 (2001–2018) IN 6 (1992–2024) MT 6 (1995–2025) NY 4 (2013–2024) GA 4 (1996–2023) MN 3 (2005–2008) VA 3 (2004–2025) NV 3 (1995–2016) WI 3 (1997–2019) NJ 3 (1993–2020) IL 3 (2018–2024) OR 3 (1995–2002) MI 3 (2023–2023) WA 2 (1984–2021) KY 2 (2023–2026) WV 2 (1999–2024) CT 2 (2002–2017) NE 2 (1989–2016) VT 2 (1999–2025) MA 2 (1983–2024) UT 2 (2002–2020) AR 2 (1973–1996) IA 2 (2024–2025)

Opinions by the citing court's state. A doctrine retained in one state and abandoned in another shows up here as a year span that stalls.

← Caselaw search · G Cite Topics · Brief Check