Already have an account? Sign in instead.
You stay signed in for 30 days on this browser.
Continue with Google Continue with MicrosoftNo account yet? Create a free one.
We sent a six-digit code.
It expires in ten minutes, works once, and only in this browser. Five wrong tries void it. Send another code.
Your account is live and the Cloudflare checks are off for this browser.
6 Indiana opinions name it 2 courts 1991–2019 0 in the last five years
The cases below were cited by Indiana courts in a sentence that names this issue. Sides come from how each citing opinion treated the case (Syfertize flag on that citation), so a case can appear on both: that is where the law is contested. A red or yellow chip is the case's own overall treatment.
| Case | Followed | Cited |
|---|---|---|
Adams v. Chavezgreen1 sentence2018See Adams, 874 N.E.2d at 1042-43 . | 1 | 1 |
Schumm v. Stategreen1 sentence2010It re-affirmed its judgment for the State on Providers' claim. 866 N.E.2d at 781. | 1 | 1 |
| Case | Negative | Cited |
|---|---|---|
| No negative-treatment citations attached to this issue in Indiana. Read the followed side critically anyway. | ||
| Case | Cited | Years |
|---|---|---|
McIntosh v. Cummins
green
1 sentence2019On December 13, 2017, the court issued an order which granted Providers' motion, directed a verdict in favor of Providers, and stated in part: [The parties' cited] cases stand for the proposition that an expert must know what the standard of care is, and at least in McIntosh [ v. Cummins , 759 N.E.2d 1180 (Ind. Ct. App. 2001), trans. denied ,] that she/he is familiar with that standard. [Dr. Shuman] was critical of the OB/GYN care, the Pediatrician's care and the nurse[s'] care. | 1 | 2019–2019 |
Sanchez v. Johnson
green
1 sentence2006"Their interests, however, though similar, are not congruent. [The Recipients'] claim requires us to decide whether § 30(A) creates a private right of action for recipients of Medicaid funding; the Providers' claim requires us to decide the same question with respect to providers of Medicaid services." Sanchez v. Johnson, 416 F.3d 1051 , 1055-56 (9th Cir.2005). | 1 | 2006–2006 |
Haggard v. PSI Energy, Inc.
green
2 sentences1996The Providers claim that an entity is subject to governmental control only to the extent that all of the operations are in the shadow of state regulation, citing Haggard v. PSI Energy, Inc., 575 N.E.2d 687 (Ind.Ct.App.1991) trans. dismissed. 1996The Providers claim that an entity is subject to governmental control only to the extent that all of the operations are in the shadow of state regulation, citing Haggard v. PSI Energy, Inc., 575 N.E.2d 687 (Ind.Ct.App.1991) trans. dismissed. | 1 | 1996–1996 |
Serban v. Halsey
green
1 sentence1991Serban v. Halsey (1989), Ind. App., 533 N.E.2d 162, 163 . | 1 | 1991–1991 |
Opinions by the citing court's state. A doctrine retained in one state and abandoned in another shows up here as a year span that stalls.