Already have an account? Sign in instead.
You stay signed in for 30 days on this browser.
Continue with Google Continue with MicrosoftNo account yet? Create a free one.
We sent a six-digit code.
It expires in ten minutes, works once, and only in this browser. Five wrong tries void it. Send another code.
Your account is live and the Cloudflare checks are off for this browser.
6 Indiana opinions name it 2 courts 1987–2018 0 in the last five years
The cases below were cited by Indiana courts in a sentence that names this issue. Sides come from how each citing opinion treated the case (Syfertize flag on that citation), so a case can appear on both: that is where the law is contested. A red or yellow chip is the case's own overall treatment.
| Case | Followed | Cited |
|---|---|---|
Scott v. Stategreen2 sentences1995See Sevion v. State (1993), Ind.App., 620 N.E.2d 736, 736 (when a juvenile who is not in custody gives a statement to police, neither the safeguards of the Miranda warnings nor the protections of I.C. 31-6-7-3 apply to him); See also Scolt v. State (1987), Ind., 510 N.E.2d 170 , cert. denied Scott v. Indiana (1987), 484 U.S. 978 , 108 S.Ct. 492 , 98 L.Ed.2d 490 . 1995See Sevion v. State (1993), IndApp., 620 N.E.2d 736, 738 (when a juvenile who is not in custody gives a statement to police, neither the safeguards of the Miranda warnings nor the protections of I.C. 31-6-7-3 apply to him); See also Scott v. State (1987), Ind., 510 N.E.2d 170 , cert, denied Scott v. Indiana (1987), 484 U.S. 978 , 108 S.Ct. 492 , 98 L.Ed.2d 490 . | 2 | 3 |
Crespo v. Armontroutgreen2 sentences1995See Sevion v. State (1993), Ind.App., 620 N.E.2d 736, 736 (when a juvenile who is not in custody gives a statement to police, neither the safeguards of the Miranda warnings nor the protections of I.C. 31-6-7-3 apply to him); See also Scolt v. State (1987), Ind., 510 N.E.2d 170 , cert. denied Scott v. Indiana (1987), 484 U.S. 978 , 108 S.Ct. 492 , 98 L.Ed.2d 490 . 1995See Sevion v. State (1993), IndApp., 620 N.E.2d 736, 738 (when a juvenile who is not in custody gives a statement to police, neither the safeguards of the Miranda warnings nor the protections of I.C. 31-6-7-3 apply to him); See also Scott v. State (1987), Ind., 510 N.E.2d 170 , cert, denied Scott v. Indiana (1987), 484 U.S. 978 , 108 S.Ct. 492 , 98 L.Ed.2d 490 . | 2 | 3 |
Frederick v. Duggergreen2 sentences1995See Sevion v. State (1993), Ind.App., 620 N.E.2d 736, 736 (when a juvenile who is not in custody gives a statement to police, neither the safeguards of the Miranda warnings nor the protections of I.C. 31-6-7-3 apply to him); See also Scolt v. State (1987), Ind., 510 N.E.2d 170 , cert. denied Scott v. Indiana (1987), 484 U.S. 978 , 108 S.Ct. 492 , 98 L.Ed.2d 490 . 1995See Sevion v. State (1993), IndApp., 620 N.E.2d 736, 738 (when a juvenile who is not in custody gives a statement to police, neither the safeguards of the Miranda warnings nor the protections of I.C. 31-6-7-3 apply to him); See also Scott v. State (1987), Ind., 510 N.E.2d 170 , cert, denied Scott v. Indiana (1987), 484 U.S. 978 , 108 S.Ct. 492 , 98 L.Ed.2d 490 . | 2 | 3 |
Scott v. Indianagreen2 sentences1995See Sevion v. State (1993), Ind.App., 620 N.E.2d 736, 736 (when a juvenile who is not in custody gives a statement to police, neither the safeguards of the Miranda warnings nor the protections of I.C. 31-6-7-3 apply to him); See also Scolt v. State (1987), Ind., 510 N.E.2d 170 , cert. denied Scott v. Indiana (1987), 484 U.S. 978 , 108 S.Ct. 492 , 98 L.Ed.2d 490 . 1995See Sevion v. State (1993), IndApp., 620 N.E.2d 736, 738 (when a juvenile who is not in custody gives a statement to police, neither the safeguards of the Miranda warnings nor the protections of I.C. 31-6-7-3 apply to him); See also Scott v. State (1987), Ind., 510 N.E.2d 170 , cert, denied Scott v. Indiana (1987), 484 U.S. 978 , 108 S.Ct. 492 , 98 L.Ed.2d 490 . | 2 | 3 |
Sevion v. Stategreen2 sentences1995See Sevion v. State (1993), Ind.App., 620 N.E.2d 736, 736 (when a juvenile who is not in custody gives a statement to police, neither the safeguards of the Miranda warnings nor the protections of I.C. 31-6-7-3 apply to him); See also Scolt v. State (1987), Ind., 510 N.E.2d 170 , cert. denied Scott v. Indiana (1987), 484 U.S. 978 , 108 S.Ct. 492 , 98 L.Ed.2d 490 . 1995See Sevion v. State (1993), IndApp., 620 N.E.2d 736, 738 (when a juvenile who is not in custody gives a statement to police, neither the safeguards of the Miranda warnings nor the protections of I.C. 31-6-7-3 apply to him); See also Scott v. State (1987), Ind., 510 N.E.2d 170 , cert, denied Scott v. Indiana (1987), 484 U.S. 978 , 108 S.Ct. 492 , 98 L.Ed.2d 490 . | 2 | 2 |
Flowers v. Stategreen1 sentence1987See Flowers v. State (1985), Ind., 481 N.E.2d 100 . | 1 | 1 |
| Case | Negative | Cited |
|---|---|---|
| No negative-treatment citations attached to this issue in Indiana. Read the followed side critically anyway. | ||
| Case | Cited | Years |
|---|---|---|
New Jersey v. T. L. O.
green
2 sentences1995CONCLUSION Based on the foregoing, the searches of S.A.'s locker and school book bag were proper pursuant to .C. 20-8.1-5-17 and the "reasonable suspicion" standard in T.L.O., 469 U.S. 325 , 105 S.Ct. 788 , 83 LEd.2d 720. 1995CONCLUSION Based on the foregoing, the searches of S A's locker and school book bag were proper pursuant to I.C. 20-8.1-5-17 and the "reasonable suspicion" standard in T.L.O., 469 U.S. 325 , 105 S.Ct. 733 , 83 L.Ed.2d 720 . | 2 | 1995–1995 |
SG v. State
green
1 sentence2018S.G. v. State , 956 N.E.2d 668 (Ind. Ct. App. 2011), trans. denied . [17] Here, Johnson was in custody and made statements to his probation officer, whom he now claims was "working in cooperation with the police." Appellant's Br. p. 36. | 1 | 2018–2018 |
Carter v. State
green
1 sentence2000Id. | 1 | 2000–2000 |
Pryor v. Commissioner
green
1 sentence1995CONCLUSION Based on the foregoing, the searches of S.A.'s locker and school book bag were proper pursuant to .C. 20-8.1-5-17 and the "reasonable suspicion" standard in T.L.O., 469 U.S. 325 , 105 S.Ct. 788 , 83 LEd.2d 720. | 1 | 1995–1995 |