tenant privilege (Indiana) · Go Syfert
← Indiana issues

tenant privilege in Indiana

6 Indiana opinions name it 1 courts 1909–2013 0 in the last five years

The cases below were cited by Indiana courts in a sentence that names this issue. Sides come from how each citing opinion treated the case (Syfertize flag on that citation), so a case can appear on both: that is where the law is contested. A red or yellow chip is the case's own overall treatment.

Followed or applied (3)

CaseFollowedCited
Cooper Industries, LLC v. City of South Bendgreen
ind · 2009 · cited in 1 Indiana opinions naming this issue, 2013–2013
1 sentence

2013A. Statute of Limitation “Statutes of limitation seek to provide security against stale claims, which in turn promotes judicial efficiency and advances the peace and welfare of society.” Cooper Indus., LLC v. City of South Bend, 899 N.E.2d 1274, 1279 (Ind. 2009).

11
Maymon v. Stategreen
ind · 2008 · cited in 1 Indiana opinions naming this issue, 2010–2010
1 sentence

2010Village Commons, LLC v. Marion County Prosecutor's Office, 882 N.E.2d 210, 216 (Ind.Ct.App.2008), trans. denied (quoting Talbott v. English, 156 Ind. 299, 307-08 , 59 N.E. 857, 860 (1901)).

11
Talbott v. Englishgreen
ind · 1901 · cited in 1 Indiana opinions naming this issue, 2010–2010
2 sentences

2010Village Commons, LLC v. Marion County Prosecutor's Office, 882 N.E.2d 210, 216 (Ind.Ct.App.2008), trans. denied (quoting Talbott v. English, 156 Ind. 299, 307-08 , 59 N.E. 857, 860 (1901)).

2010Village Commons, LLC v. Marion County Prosecutor's Office, 882 N.E.2d 210, 216 (Ind.Ct.App.2008), trans. denied (quoting Talbott v. English, 156 Ind. 299, 307-08 , 59 N.E. 857, 860 (1901)).

11

Distinguished, questioned or overruled (0)

CaseNegativeCited
No negative-treatment citations attached to this issue in Indiana. Read the followed side critically anyway.

Also cited on this issue (5)

CaseCitedYears
Kramer v. Cook green
· 1856
2 sentences

1910In this case, if notice is stipulated for, it must be given; but, if not stipulated for, the tenant’s mere continuance in possession and paying rent, though with no express notice of his desire for the further term, entitles and binds him thereto.” Kramer v. Cook (1856), 73 Mass. 550 ; Peehl v. Bumbalek (1898), 99 Wis. 62 , 74 N. W. 545 ; Hardiug v. Seeley (1892), 148 Pa. St. 20, 23 Atl. 1118 ; Mershon v. Williams (1899), 62 N. J.

1909In this case, if notice is stipulated for, it must be given; but, if not stipulated for, the tenant’s mere continuance in possession and paying rent, though with no express notice of his desire for the further term, entitles and binds him thereto.” Kramer v. Cook (1856), 73 Mass. 550 ; Peehl v. Bumbalek (1898), 99 Wis. 62 , 74 N. W. 545 ; Harding v. Seeley (1892), 148 Pa. St. 20, 23 Atl. 1118 ; Mershon v. Williams (1899), 62 N. J.

21909–1910
Harding v. Seeley green
· 1892
2 sentences

1910In this case, if notice is stipulated for, it must be given; but, if not stipulated for, the tenant’s mere continuance in possession and paying rent, though with no express notice of his desire for the further term, entitles and binds him thereto.” Kramer v. Cook (1856), 73 Mass. 550 ; Peehl v. Bumbalek (1898), 99 Wis. 62 , 74 N. W. 545 ; Hardiug v. Seeley (1892), 148 Pa. St. 20, 23 Atl. 1118 ; Mershon v. Williams (1899), 62 N. J.

1909In this case, if notice is stipulated for, it must be given; but, if not stipulated for, the tenant’s mere continuance in possession and paying rent, though with no express notice of his desire for the further term, entitles and binds him thereto.” Kramer v. Cook (1856), 73 Mass. 550 ; Peehl v. Bumbalek (1898), 99 Wis. 62 , 74 N. W. 545 ; Harding v. Seeley (1892), 148 Pa. St. 20, 23 Atl. 1118 ; Mershon v. Williams (1899), 62 N. J.

21909–1910
Peehl v. Bumbalek neutral
· 1898
2 sentences

1910In this case, if notice is stipulated for, it must be given; but, if not stipulated for, the tenant’s mere continuance in possession and paying rent, though with no express notice of his desire for the further term, entitles and binds him thereto.” Kramer v. Cook (1856), 73 Mass. 550 ; Peehl v. Bumbalek (1898), 99 Wis. 62 , 74 N. W. 545 ; Hardiug v. Seeley (1892), 148 Pa. St. 20, 23 Atl. 1118 ; Mershon v. Williams (1899), 62 N. J.

1910In this case, if notice is stipulated for, it must be given; but, if not stipulated for, the tenant’s mere continuance in possession and paying rent, though with no express notice of his desire for the further term, entitles and binds him thereto.” Kramer v. Cook (1856), 73 Mass. 550 ; Peehl v. Bumbalek (1898), 99 Wis. 62 , 74 N. W. 545 ; Hardiug v. Seeley (1892), 148 Pa. St. 20, 23 Atl. 1118 ; Mershon v. Williams (1899), 62 N. J.

21909–1910
Kahf v. Charleston South Apartments green
indctapp · 1984
2 sentences

1995Rather, the tenants in Hodge relied on Kahf v. Charleston South Apartments (1984), Ind.App., 461 N.E.2d 723 , trans. denied, in support of their argument that personal injury claims were recoverable under the implied warranty of habitability.

1995Rather, the tenants in Hodge relied on Kahf v. Charleston South Apartments (1984), Ind. App., 461 N.E.2d 723 , trans. denied, in support of their argument that personal injury claims were recoverable under the implied warranty of habitability.

11995–1995
Terstegge v. First German Mutual Benevolent Society neutral
ind · 1883
1 sentence

1930Terstegge v. German Mutual Society (1883), 92 Ind. 82 , 47 Am.

11930–1930

Where else courts name it

NY 76 (1850–2026) NJ 14 (1952–2021) TX 11 (1902–2024) CA 11 (1880–2025) IL 11 (1919–2023) PA 10 (1901–2023) DC 8 (1943–2024) MA 6 (1892–2012) CT 6 (1881–2017) AZ 6 (1970–2018) IN 6 (1909–2013) MD 5 (1966–2020) FL 5 (1987–2016) IA 5 (1901–2009) OK 5 (1907–2019) GA 5 (1908–2015) WA 4 (1901–2016) MO 4 (1895–2000) OH 4 (1983–2016) VT 4 (2003–2025) NM 3 (1990–2022) UT 3 (2001–2019) PR 2 (1957–1962) OR 2 (1880–2007) SC 2 (1930–2025)

Opinions by the citing court's state. A doctrine retained in one state and abandoned in another shows up here as a year span that stalls.

← Caselaw search · G Cite Topics · Brief Check