Already have an account? Sign in instead.
You stay signed in for 30 days on this browser.
Continue with Google Continue with MicrosoftNo account yet? Create a free one.
We sent a six-digit code.
It expires in ten minutes, works once, and only in this browser. Five wrong tries void it. Send another code.
Your account is live and the Cloudflare checks are off for this browser.
6 Kansas opinions name it 2 courts 1999–2021 1 in the last five years
The cases below were cited by Kansas courts in a sentence that names this issue. Sides come from how each citing opinion treated the case (Syfertize flag on that citation), so a case can appear on both: that is where the law is contested. A red or yellow chip is the case's own overall treatment.
| Case | Followed | Cited |
|---|---|---|
State v. Williamsgreen2 sentences2021And as previously explained, under the first part of the overbreadth doctrine test, Trotter had to "do more than imagine a conceivable activity that would be constitutionally protected but would run afoul of the aggravated trafficking statute because '[a]lmost every law is potentially applicable to constitutionally protected acts' and would be unconstitutional if any hypothetical, unconstitutional application was all that had to be established." 299 Kan. at 920 . 2021See Williams, 299 Kan. at 921 (holding that "'courts will not give strained meanings to legislative language through a process of imaginative hypothesizing; a common-sense interpretation of the statute is the guiding principle'"). | 1 | 1 |
State v. Neighborsgreen1 sentence1999See also State v. Neighbors, 21 Kan. | 1 | 1 |
| Case | Negative | Cited |
|---|---|---|
| No negative-treatment citations attached to this issue in Kansas. Read the followed side critically anyway. | ||
| Case | Cited | Years |
|---|---|---|
State v. Wilson
green
2 sentences2014The Wilson court rejected the defendants’ arguments by declaring that “courts will not give strained meanings to legislative language through a process of imaginative hypothesizing; a common-sense interpretation of the statute is the guiding principle.” 267 Kan. at 557 . 2013The Wilson court rejected the defendant’s facially seductive argument by declaring that “courts will not give strained meanings to legislative language through a process of imaginative hypothesizing; a common-sense interpretation of the statute is the guiding principle.” 267 Kan. at 557 . | 4 | 2011–2014 |
State v. Fisher
green
2 sentences2014Further, the court noted that statutes like the child endangerment statute, which are designed to protect children; “are necessarily drawn with broad language because they are designed to cover a broad range of conduct and circumstances.” 267 Kan. at 557 (citing State v. Fisher, 230 Kan. 192, 198 , 631 P.2d 239 [1981]). 2014Further, the court noted that statutes like the child endangerment statute, which are designed to protect children; “are necessarily drawn with broad language because they are designed to cover a broad range of conduct and circumstances.” 267 Kan. at 557 (citing State v. Fisher, 230 Kan. 192, 198 , 631 P.2d 239 [1981]). | 1 | 2014–2014 |
People v. Beaugez
green
2 sentences1999As to the argument about permitting football to be played, our court in Fisher, 230 Kan. at 197 , looked to the People v. Beaugez, 232 Cal. App. 2d 650, 658 , 43 Cal. Rptr. 28 (1965), response that courts will not give strained meanings to legislative language through a process of imaginative hypothesizing; a common-sense interpretation of the statute is the guiding principle. 1999As to the argument about permitting football to be played, our court in Fisher, 230 Kan. at 197 , looked to the People v. Beaugez, 232 Cal. App. 2d 650, 658 , 43 Cal. Rptr. 28 (1965), response that courts will not give strained meanings to legislative language through a process of imaginative hypothesizing; a common-sense interpretation of the statute is the guiding principle. | 1 | 1999–1999 |
Counted by distinct opinions that both name this issue and are annotated to the section; sections every opinion cites regardless of issue are not filtered here, so read the counts against the total above.