Already have an account? Sign in instead.
You stay signed in for 30 days on this browser.
Continue with Google Continue with MicrosoftNo account yet? Create a free one.
We sent a six-digit code.
It expires in ten minutes, works once, and only in this browser. Five wrong tries void it. Send another code.
Your account is live and the Cloudflare checks are off for this browser.
6 Kansas opinions name it 2 courts 1965–1997 0 in the last five years
The cases below were cited by Kansas courts in a sentence that names this issue. Sides come from how each citing opinion treated the case (Syfertize flag on that citation), so a case can appear on both: that is where the law is contested. A red or yellow chip is the case's own overall treatment.
| Case | Followed | Cited |
|---|---|---|
| No positive-treatment citations attached to this issue in Kansas. | ||
| Case | Negative | Cited |
|---|---|---|
| No negative-treatment citations attached to this issue in Kansas. Read the followed side critically anyway. | ||
| Case | Cited | Years |
|---|---|---|
Tri-State Hotel Co. v. Londerholm
green
2 sentences1997In Tri-State Hotel Co. v. Londerholm, 195 Kan. 748, 760 , 408 P.2d 877 (1965), the court stated: “This court is by the Constitution not made the critic of the legislature, but rather, the guardian of the Constitution; and every legislative act comes before this court surrounded with the presumption of constitutionality. 1994The longstanding, well-established, and often-cited rules that govern an appellate court’s review of the constitutionality of a statute are set forth in Tri-State Hotel Co. v. Londerholm, 195 Kan. 748, 760 , 408 P.2d 877 (1965): “This court is by the Constitution not made the critic of the legislature, but rather, the guardian of the Constitution; and every legislative act comes before this court surrounded with the presumption of constitutionality. | 5 | 1974–1997 |
Pinkerton v. Schwiethale
green
2 sentences1974(City of Colby v. Hurtt, 212 Kan. 113 , 509 P. 2d 1142 ; City of Lyons v. Suttle, 209 Kan. 735 , 498 P. 2d 9 ; Pinkerton v. Schwiethale, 208 Kan. 596 , 493 P. 2d 200 .) The rules governing the supreme court in applying this test were considered in Tri-State Hotel Co. v. Londerholm, 195 Kan. 748 , 408 P. 2d 877 , wherein we stated: “ ‘This court is by the Constitution not made the critic of the legislature, but rather, the guardian of the Constitution; and every legislative act comes before this court surrounded with the presumption of constitutionality. 1974(City of Colby v. Hurtt, 212 Kan. 113 , 509 P. 2d 1142 ; City of Lyons v. Suttle, 209 Kan. 735 , 498 P. 2d 9 ; Pinkerton v. Schwiethale, 208 Kan. 596 , 493 P. 2d 200 .) The rules governing the supreme court in applying this test were considered in Tri-State Hotel Co. v. Londerholm, 195 Kan. 748 , 408 P. 2d 877 , wherein we stated: “ ‘This court is by the Constitution not made the critic of the legislature, but rather, the guardian of the Constitution; and every legislative act comes before this court surrounded with the presumption of constitutionality. | 1 | 1974–1974 |
City of Colby v. Hurtt
green
2 sentences1974(City of Colby v. Hurtt, 212 Kan. 113 , 509 P. 2d 1142 ; City of Lyons v. Suttle, 209 Kan. 735 , 498 P. 2d 9 ; Pinkerton v. Schwiethale, 208 Kan. 596 , 493 P. 2d 200 .) The rules governing the supreme court in applying this test were considered in Tri-State Hotel Co. v. Londerholm, 195 Kan. 748 , 408 P. 2d 877 , wherein we stated: “ ‘This court is by the Constitution not made the critic of the legislature, but rather, the guardian of the Constitution; and every legislative act comes before this court surrounded with the presumption of constitutionality. 1974(City of Colby v. Hurtt, 212 Kan. 113 , 509 P. 2d 1142 ; City of Lyons v. Suttle, 209 Kan. 735 , 498 P. 2d 9 ; Pinkerton v. Schwiethale, 208 Kan. 596 , 493 P. 2d 200 .) The rules governing the supreme court in applying this test were considered in Tri-State Hotel Co. v. Londerholm, 195 Kan. 748 , 408 P. 2d 877 , wherein we stated: “ ‘This court is by the Constitution not made the critic of the legislature, but rather, the guardian of the Constitution; and every legislative act comes before this court surrounded with the presumption of constitutionality. | 1 | 1974–1974 |
City of Lyons v. Suttle
green
2 sentences1974(City of Colby v. Hurtt, 212 Kan. 113 , 509 P. 2d 1142 ; City of Lyons v. Suttle, 209 Kan. 735 , 498 P. 2d 9 ; Pinkerton v. Schwiethale, 208 Kan. 596 , 493 P. 2d 200 .) The rules governing the supreme court in applying this test were considered in Tri-State Hotel Co. v. Londerholm, 195 Kan. 748 , 408 P. 2d 877 , wherein we stated: “ ‘This court is by the Constitution not made the critic of the legislature, but rather, the guardian of the Constitution; and every legislative act comes before this court surrounded with the presumption of constitutionality. 1974(City of Colby v. Hurtt, 212 Kan. 113 , 509 P. 2d 1142 ; City of Lyons v. Suttle, 209 Kan. 735 , 498 P. 2d 9 ; Pinkerton v. Schwiethale, 208 Kan. 596 , 493 P. 2d 200 .) The rules governing the supreme court in applying this test were considered in Tri-State Hotel Co. v. Londerholm, 195 Kan. 748 , 408 P. 2d 877 , wherein we stated: “ ‘This court is by the Constitution not made the critic of the legislature, but rather, the guardian of the Constitution; and every legislative act comes before this court surrounded with the presumption of constitutionality. | 1 | 1974–1974 |
Winters v. Myers
green
2 sentences1965(Winters v. Myers, 92 Kan. 414, 421 , 140 Pac. 1033 ; State v. Wilson, 101 Kan. 789, 796 , *760 168 Pac. 679 ; Chamberlain v. Railway Co., 107 Kan. 341, 344 , 191 Pac. 261 ; Railroad and Light Co. v. Court of Industrial Relations, 113 Kan. 217, 229 , 214 Pac. 797 ; Central Kansas Power Co. v. State Corporation Commission, 181 Kan. 817, 828 , 316 P. 2d 277 .) This court is by the Constitution not made the critic of the legislature, but rather, the guardian of the Constitution; and every legislative act comes before this court surrounded with the presumption of constitutionality. 1965(Winters v. Myers, 92 Kan. 414, 421 , 140 Pac. 1033 ; State v. Wilson, 101 Kan. 789, 796 , *760 168 Pac. 679 ; Chamberlain v. Railway Co., 107 Kan. 341, 344 , 191 Pac. 261 ; Railroad and Light Co. v. Court of Industrial Relations, 113 Kan. 217, 229 , 214 Pac. 797 ; Central Kansas Power Co. v. State Corporation Commission, 181 Kan. 817, 828 , 316 P. 2d 277 .) This court is by the Constitution not made the critic of the legislature, but rather, the guardian of the Constitution; and every legislative act comes before this court surrounded with the presumption of constitutionality. | 1 | 1965–1965 |
Chamberlain v. Missouri Pacific Railway Co.
neutral
2 sentences1965(Winters v. Myers, 92 Kan. 414, 421 , 140 Pac. 1033 ; State v. Wilson, 101 Kan. 789, 796 , *760 168 Pac. 679 ; Chamberlain v. Railway Co., 107 Kan. 341, 344 , 191 Pac. 261 ; Railroad and Light Co. v. Court of Industrial Relations, 113 Kan. 217, 229 , 214 Pac. 797 ; Central Kansas Power Co. v. State Corporation Commission, 181 Kan. 817, 828 , 316 P. 2d 277 .) This court is by the Constitution not made the critic of the legislature, but rather, the guardian of the Constitution; and every legislative act comes before this court surrounded with the presumption of constitutionality. 1965(Winters v. Myers, 92 Kan. 414, 421 , 140 Pac. 1033 ; State v. Wilson, 101 Kan. 789, 796 , *760 168 Pac. 679 ; Chamberlain v. Railway Co., 107 Kan. 341, 344 , 191 Pac. 261 ; Railroad and Light Co. v. Court of Industrial Relations, 113 Kan. 217, 229 , 214 Pac. 797 ; Central Kansas Power Co. v. State Corporation Commission, 181 Kan. 817, 828 , 316 P. 2d 277 .) This court is by the Constitution not made the critic of the legislature, but rather, the guardian of the Constitution; and every legislative act comes before this court surrounded with the presumption of constitutionality. | 1 | 1965–1965 |
State v. Wilson
green
2 sentences1965(Winters v. Myers, 92 Kan. 414, 421 , 140 Pac. 1033 ; State v. Wilson, 101 Kan. 789, 796 , *760 168 Pac. 679 ; Chamberlain v. Railway Co., 107 Kan. 341, 344 , 191 Pac. 261 ; Railroad and Light Co. v. Court of Industrial Relations, 113 Kan. 217, 229 , 214 Pac. 797 ; Central Kansas Power Co. v. State Corporation Commission, 181 Kan. 817, 828 , 316 P. 2d 277 .) This court is by the Constitution not made the critic of the legislature, but rather, the guardian of the Constitution; and every legislative act comes before this court surrounded with the presumption of constitutionality. 1965(Winters v. Myers, 92 Kan. 414, 421 , 140 Pac. 1033 ; State v. Wilson, 101 Kan. 789, 796 , *760 168 Pac. 679 ; Chamberlain v. Railway Co., 107 Kan. 341, 344 , 191 Pac. 261 ; Railroad and Light Co. v. Court of Industrial Relations, 113 Kan. 217, 229 , 214 Pac. 797 ; Central Kansas Power Co. v. State Corporation Commission, 181 Kan. 817, 828 , 316 P. 2d 277 .) This court is by the Constitution not made the critic of the legislature, but rather, the guardian of the Constitution; and every legislative act comes before this court surrounded with the presumption of constitutionality. | 1 | 1965–1965 |
Wichita Railroad & Light Co. v. Court of Industrial Relations
neutral
2 sentences1965(Winters v. Myers, 92 Kan. 414, 421 , 140 Pac. 1033 ; State v. Wilson, 101 Kan. 789, 796 , *760 168 Pac. 679 ; Chamberlain v. Railway Co., 107 Kan. 341, 344 , 191 Pac. 261 ; Railroad and Light Co. v. Court of Industrial Relations, 113 Kan. 217, 229 , 214 Pac. 797 ; Central Kansas Power Co. v. State Corporation Commission, 181 Kan. 817, 828 , 316 P. 2d 277 .) This court is by the Constitution not made the critic of the legislature, but rather, the guardian of the Constitution; and every legislative act comes before this court surrounded with the presumption of constitutionality. 1965(Winters v. Myers, 92 Kan. 414, 421 , 140 Pac. 1033 ; State v. Wilson, 101 Kan. 789, 796 , *760 168 Pac. 679 ; Chamberlain v. Railway Co., 107 Kan. 341, 344 , 191 Pac. 261 ; Railroad and Light Co. v. Court of Industrial Relations, 113 Kan. 217, 229 , 214 Pac. 797 ; Central Kansas Power Co. v. State Corporation Commission, 181 Kan. 817, 828 , 316 P. 2d 277 .) This court is by the Constitution not made the critic of the legislature, but rather, the guardian of the Constitution; and every legislative act comes before this court surrounded with the presumption of constitutionality. | 1 | 1965–1965 |
Central Kansas Power Co. v. State Corporation Comm.
green
2 sentences1965(Winters v. Myers, 92 Kan. 414, 421 , 140 Pac. 1033 ; State v. Wilson, 101 Kan. 789, 796 , *760 168 Pac. 679 ; Chamberlain v. Railway Co., 107 Kan. 341, 344 , 191 Pac. 261 ; Railroad and Light Co. v. Court of Industrial Relations, 113 Kan. 217, 229 , 214 Pac. 797 ; Central Kansas Power Co. v. State Corporation Commission, 181 Kan. 817, 828 , 316 P. 2d 277 .) This court is by the Constitution not made the critic of the legislature, but rather, the guardian of the Constitution; and every legislative act comes before this court surrounded with the presumption of constitutionality. 1965(Winters v. Myers, 92 Kan. 414, 421 , 140 Pac. 1033 ; State v. Wilson, 101 Kan. 789, 796 , *760 168 Pac. 679 ; Chamberlain v. Railway Co., 107 Kan. 341, 344 , 191 Pac. 261 ; Railroad and Light Co. v. Court of Industrial Relations, 113 Kan. 217, 229 , 214 Pac. 797 ; Central Kansas Power Co. v. State Corporation Commission, 181 Kan. 817, 828 , 316 P. 2d 277 .) This court is by the Constitution not made the critic of the legislature, but rather, the guardian of the Constitution; and every legislative act comes before this court surrounded with the presumption of constitutionality. | 1 | 1965–1965 |
Counted by distinct opinions that both name this issue and are annotated to the section; sections every opinion cites regardless of issue are not filtered here, so read the counts against the total above.
Opinions by the citing court's state. A doctrine retained in one state and abandoned in another shows up here as a year span that stalls.