Already have an account? Sign in instead.
You stay signed in for 30 days on this browser.
Continue with Google Continue with MicrosoftNo account yet? Create a free one.
We sent a six-digit code.
It expires in ten minutes, works once, and only in this browser. Five wrong tries void it. Send another code.
Your account is live and the Cloudflare checks are off for this browser.
6 Kentucky opinions name it 3 courts 1928–2026 2 in the last five years
The cases below were cited by Kentucky courts in a sentence that names this issue. Sides come from how each citing opinion treated the case (Syfertize flag on that citation), so a case can appear on both: that is where the law is contested. A red or yellow chip is the case's own overall treatment.
| Case | Followed | Cited |
|---|---|---|
Inland Steel Co. v. Hallgreen2 sentences2024Representative Kulkarni maintains any contrary interpretation would render the 1990 Amendments meaningless in violation of the well- established rule that “[w]here a clause in an old enactment is omitted from the 15 new one, it is to be inferred that the Legislature intended that the omitted clause should no longer be the law.” Inland Steel Co. v. Hall, 245 S.W.2d 437, 438 (Ky. 1952). 2012One of these is ... where a clause in an old enactment is omitted from the new one, it is to be inferred that the Legislature intended that the omitted clause should no longer be the law.” Inland Steel Co. v. Hall, 245 S.W.2d 437 (Ky.1952). | 1 | 2 |
Eversole v. Eversolegreen2 sentences1988We quoted with approval from Eversole v. Eversole, 169 Ky. 793 , 185 S.W. 487, 489 (1916), as follows: Where a statute is amended or re-enacted in different language, it will not be presumed that the difference between the two statutes was due to oversight or inadvertence on the part of the Legislature. 1988We quoted with approval from Eversole v. Eversole, 169 Ky. 793 , 185 S.W. 487, 489 (1916), as follows: Where a statute is amended or re-enacted in different language, it will not be presumed that the difference between the two statutes was due to oversight or inadvertence on the part of the Legislature. | 1 | 2 |
Smith v. Smithgreen1 sentence2026See Smith, 450 S.W.3d at 731-32 . -19- In sum, we discern no palpable error in the family court’s modifying custody and granting sole custody to Mother based on its taking note that Father had been charged with, but not yet convicted of, DUI, among other circumstances. | 1 | 1 |
| Case | Negative | Cited |
|---|---|---|
| No negative-treatment citations attached to this issue in Kentucky. Read the followed side critically anyway. | ||
| Case | Cited | Years |
|---|---|---|
Rose v. Turner
green
2 sentences1952This principle is thus stated in Rose v. Turner, 301 Ky. 272 , 191 S.W.2d 397 , 398: “It is fundamental that in the enactment of a more recent statute, prior enactments on the same subj ect are presumed to have been in the mind of the Legislature.” Another presumption is that where a clause in an old enactment is omitted from the new one, it is to be inferred that the Legislature intended that the omitted clause should no longer be the law. 1952This principle is thus stated in Rose v. Turner, 301 Ky. 272 , 191 S.W.2d 397 , 398: “It is fundamental that in the enactment of a more recent statute, prior enactments on the same subj ect are presumed to have been in the mind of the Legislature.” Another presumption is that where a clause in an old enactment is omitted from the new one, it is to be inferred that the Legislature intended that the omitted clause should no longer be the law. | 1 | 1952–1952 |
Thacker v. Commonwealth
neutral
2 sentences1928Thacker v. Commonwealth, 199 Ky. 521 , 251 S. W. 943 . 1928Thacker v. Commonwealth, 199 Ky. 521 , 251 S. W. 943 . | 1 | 1928–1928 |
Opinions by the citing court's state. A doctrine retained in one state and abandoned in another shows up here as a year span that stalls.