Already have an account? Sign in instead.
You stay signed in for 30 days on this browser.
Continue with Google Continue with MicrosoftNo account yet? Create a free one.
We sent a six-digit code.
It expires in ten minutes, works once, and only in this browser. Five wrong tries void it. Send another code.
Your account is live and the Cloudflare checks are off for this browser.
21 Michigan opinions name it 2 courts 1982–2026 5 in the last five years
The cases below were cited by Michigan courts in a sentence that names this issue. Sides come from how each citing opinion treated the case (Syfertize flag on that citation), so a case can appear on both: that is where the law is contested. A red or yellow chip is the case's own overall treatment.
| Case | Followed | Cited |
|---|---|---|
Spohn v. Van Dyke Public Schoolsgreen2 sentences2023“More specifically, courts primarily examine a plaintiff’s efforts to correct the bankruptcy schedules and to make the bankruptcy court aware of any initially undisclosed claims.” Id. at 487 (emphasis added). 2023Plaintiff claims that “Slattery corrected the innocent mistake on the record in bankruptcy court.” It is true that, “[w]hen considering whether ‘the evidence indicates an absence of bad faith,’ courts will look, in particular, at the plaintiff’s ‘attempts’ to advise the bankruptcy court of the omitted claim.” Spohn, 296 Mich App at 486-487 (citation omitted). | 4 | 4 |
People v. Sardygreen2 sentences2022Moreover, “[t]he failure of the court to instruct on any point of law shall not be ground for setting aside the verdict of the jury unless such instruction is requested by the accused.” MCL 768.29; see also People v Sardy, 216 Mich App 111, 113 ; 549 NW2d 23 (1996) (“This Court will not reverse a conviction on the basis of alleged instructional error unless the defendant has requested the omitted instruction or objected to the instructions given.”). 4 People v Ginther, 390 Mich 436 ; 212 NW2d 922 (1973). -3- outcome.” People v Randolph, 502 Mich 1, 9 ; 917 NW2d 249 (2018). 2022Moreover, “[t]he failure of the court to instruct on any point of law shall not be ground for setting aside the verdict of the jury unless such instruction is requested by the accused.” MCL 768.29; see also People v Sardy, 216 Mich App 111, 113 ; 549 NW2d 23 (1996) (“This Court will not reverse a conviction on the basis of alleged instructional error unless the defendant has requested the omitted instruction or objected to the instructions given.”). 4 People v Ginther, 390 Mich 436 ; 212 NW2d 922 (1973). -3- outcome.” People v Randolph, 502 Mich 1, 9 ; 917 NW2d 249 (2018). | 1 | 1 |
People v. Uphausgreen2 sentences2022“Effective assistance of counsel is presumed and defendant bears the burden of proving otherwise.” Petri, 279 Mich App at 410 ; see also People v Uphaus, 278 Mich App 174, 185 ; 748 NW2d 899 (2008) (“Defendant must overcome a strong presumption that counsel’s performance constituted sound trial strategy.”). 2022“Effective assistance of counsel is presumed and defendant bears the burden of proving otherwise.” Petri, 279 Mich App at 410 ; see also People v Uphaus, 278 Mich App 174, 185 ; 748 NW2d 899 (2008) (“Defendant must overcome a strong presumption that counsel’s performance constituted sound trial strategy.”). | 1 | 1 |
Dubuc v. Green Oak Townshipgreen2 sentences2009See Dubuc v Green Oak Twp, 117 F Supp 2d 610, 625 (ED Mich, 2000), aff'd 312 F3d 736 (CA 6, 2002) (“When, in the course of a law suit, the plaintiff becomes aware of a new cause of action against the same defendant, the plaintiff should move to include the new claim or risk having the doctrine of claim preclusion [res judicata] apply to the omitted claim.”). 2009See Dubuc v. Green Oak Twp., 117 F. Supp 2d 610, 625 (E.D.Mich., 2000), aff'd 312 F.3d 736 (C.A.6, 2002) ("When, in the course of a law suit, the plaintiff becomes aware of a new cause of action against the same defendant, the plaintiff should move to include the new claim or risk having the doctrine of claim preclusion [res judicata] apply to the omitted claim."). | 1 | 1 |
Dubuc v. Green Oak Townshipgreen1 sentence2009See Dubuc v Green Oak Twp, 117 F Supp 2d 610, 625 (ED Mich, 2000), aff'd 312 F3d 736 (CA 6, 2002) (“When, in the course of a law suit, the plaintiff becomes aware of a new cause of action against the same defendant, the plaintiff should move to include the new claim or risk having the doctrine of claim preclusion [res judicata] apply to the omitted claim.”). | 1 | 1 |
People v. Mitchellgreen2 sentences2001See People v Lawrence, 413 Mich 866 ; 317 NW2d 856 (1982), 9 People v Mitchell, 125 Mich App 475 ; 336 NW2d 31 (1983), and People v Heintzelman, 142 Mich App 94 ; 368 NW2d 903 (1985). 10 To the extent that these cases held that the omission of the presumption of innocence from guilty plea proceedings requires an automatic reversal of the guilty plea, we disapprove of them. 11 In Guilty Plea Cases, we did recognize that the presumption of innocence is “at the core of our criminal process and fundamental to defendant’s understanding of a trial.” Id. at 125 . 2001See People v Lawrence, 413 Mich 866 ; 317 NW2d 856 (1982), 9 People v Mitchell, 125 Mich App 475 ; 336 NW2d 31 (1983), and People v Heintzelman, 142 Mich App 94 ; 368 NW2d 903 (1985). 10 To the extent that these cases held that the omission of the presumption of innocence from guilty plea proceedings requires an automatic reversal of the guilty plea, we disapprove of them. 11 In Guilty Plea Cases, we did recognize that the presumption of innocence is “at the core of our criminal process and fundamental to defendant’s understanding of a trial.” Id. at 125 . | 1 | 1 |
People v. Heintzelmangreen2 sentences2001See People v Lawrence, 413 Mich 866 ; 317 NW2d 856 (1982), 9 People v Mitchell, 125 Mich App 475 ; 336 NW2d 31 (1983), and People v Heintzelman, 142 Mich App 94 ; 368 NW2d 903 (1985). 10 To the extent that these cases held that the omission of the presumption of innocence from guilty plea proceedings requires an automatic reversal of the guilty plea, we disapprove of them. 11 In Guilty Plea Cases, we did recognize that the presumption of innocence is “at the core of our criminal process and fundamental to defendant’s understanding of a trial.” Id. at 125 . 2001See People v Lawrence, 413 Mich 866 ; 317 NW2d 856 (1982), 9 People v Mitchell, 125 Mich App 475 ; 336 NW2d 31 (1983), and People v Heintzelman, 142 Mich App 94 ; 368 NW2d 903 (1985). 10 To the extent that these cases held that the omission of the presumption of innocence from guilty plea proceedings requires an automatic reversal of the guilty plea, we disapprove of them. 11 In Guilty Plea Cases, we did recognize that the presumption of innocence is “at the core of our criminal process and fundamental to defendant’s understanding of a trial.” Id. at 125 . | 1 | 1 |
In Re Guilty Plea Casesgreen1 sentence2001See People v. Lawrence, 413 Mich. 866 , 317 N.W.2d 856 (1982), [9] People v. Mitchell, 125 Mich.App. 475 , 336 N.W.2d 31 (1983), and People v. Heintzelman, 142 Mich.App. 94 , 368 N.W.2d 903 (1985). [10] *325 To the extent that these cases held that the omission of the presumption of innocence from a guilty plea proceedings requires an automatic reversal of the guilty plea, we disapprove of them. [11] In Guilty Plea Cases , we did recognize that the presumption of innocence is "at the core of our criminal process and fundamental to defendant's understanding of a trial." Id. at 125 , 235 N.W.2d | 1 | 1 |
People v. Fredericksgreen2 sentences1989See also People v Fredericks, 125 Mich App 114, 120-122 ; 335 NW2d 919 (1983). 1989See also People v Fredericks, 125 Mich App 114, 120-122 ; 335 NW2d 919 (1983). | 1 | 1 |
| Case | Negative | Cited |
|---|---|---|
| No negative-treatment citations attached to this issue in Michigan. Read the followed side critically anyway. | ||
| Case | Cited | Years |
|---|---|---|
People v. McCoy
red
2 sentences2003McCoy, supra at 238-239 ; People v Tucker, 181 Mich App 246, 256 ; 448 NW2d 811 (1989). 6 The latter half of this holding, commonly called the “closely drawn” rule, states that it may be an error requiring reversal for a court to fail to give sua sponte a cautionary instruction when the issue of defendant’s involvement is “closely drawn.” This rule arguably conflicts with MCL 768.29, which provides that a verdict may not be set aside because of an omitted instruction if the defendant failed to request the instruction. 1996As this Court iterated in People v Tucker, 181 Mich App 246, 256 ; 448 NW2d 811 (1989), “]w]hen the omitted instruction pertains to the need to examine an accomplice’s testimony with caution, the failure to give the instruction sua sponte requires reversal if the issue of the defendant’s guilt is ‘closely drawn.’ ” See People v McCoy, 392 Mich 231, 240 ; 220 NW2d 456 (1974). | 3 | 1989–2003 |
People v. Tucker
green
2 sentences2003McCoy, supra at 238-239 ; People v Tucker, 181 Mich App 246, 256 ; 448 NW2d 811 (1989). 6 The latter half of this holding, commonly called the “closely drawn” rule, states that it may be an error requiring reversal for a court to fail to give sua sponte a cautionary instruction when the issue of defendant’s involvement is “closely drawn.” This rule arguably conflicts with MCL 768.29, which provides that a verdict may not be set aside because of an omitted instruction if the defendant failed to request the instruction. 2003McCoy, supra at 238-239 ; People v Tucker, 181 Mich App 246, 256 ; 448 NW2d 811 (1989). 6 The latter half of this holding, commonly called the “closely drawn” rule, states that it may be an error requiring reversal for a court to fail to give sua sponte a cautionary instruction when the issue of defendant’s involvement is “closely drawn.” This rule arguably conflicts with MCL 768.29, which provides that a verdict may not be set aside because of an omitted instruction if the defendant failed to request the instruction. | 3 | 1991–2003 |
People v. Gonzalez
green
2 sentences2026People v Gonzalez, 468 Mich 636, 643 ; 664 NW2d 159 (2003). 2024Therefore, defendant is precluded from arguing that the omitted instruction was error.” Id. | 2 | 2024–2026 |
People v. Ginther
green
2 sentences2022Moreover, “[t]he failure of the court to instruct on any point of law shall not be ground for setting aside the verdict of the jury unless such instruction is requested by the accused.” MCL 768.29; see also People v Sardy, 216 Mich App 111, 113 ; 549 NW2d 23 (1996) (“This Court will not reverse a conviction on the basis of alleged instructional error unless the defendant has requested the omitted instruction or objected to the instructions given.”). 4 People v Ginther, 390 Mich 436 ; 212 NW2d 922 (1973). -3- outcome.” People v Randolph, 502 Mich 1, 9 ; 917 NW2d 249 (2018). 2022Moreover, “[t]he failure of the court to instruct on any point of law shall not be ground for setting aside the verdict of the jury unless such instruction is requested by the accused.” MCL 768.29; see also People v Sardy, 216 Mich App 111, 113 ; 549 NW2d 23 (1996) (“This Court will not reverse a conviction on the basis of alleged instructional error unless the defendant has requested the omitted instruction or objected to the instructions given.”). 4 People v Ginther, 390 Mich 436 ; 212 NW2d 922 (1973). -3- outcome.” People v Randolph, 502 Mich 1, 9 ; 917 NW2d 249 (2018). | 2 | 1996–2022 |
People v. Randolph
green
2 sentences2022Moreover, “[t]he failure of the court to instruct on any point of law shall not be ground for setting aside the verdict of the jury unless such instruction is requested by the accused.” MCL 768.29; see also People v Sardy, 216 Mich App 111, 113 ; 549 NW2d 23 (1996) (“This Court will not reverse a conviction on the basis of alleged instructional error unless the defendant has requested the omitted instruction or objected to the instructions given.”). 4 People v Ginther, 390 Mich 436 ; 212 NW2d 922 (1973). -3- outcome.” People v Randolph, 502 Mich 1, 9 ; 917 NW2d 249 (2018). 2022Moreover, “[t]he failure of the court to instruct on any point of law shall not be ground for setting aside the verdict of the jury unless such instruction is requested by the accused.” MCL 768.29; see also People v Sardy, 216 Mich App 111, 113 ; 549 NW2d 23 (1996) (“This Court will not reverse a conviction on the basis of alleged instructional error unless the defendant has requested the omitted instruction or objected to the instructions given.”). 4 People v Ginther, 390 Mich 436 ; 212 NW2d 922 (1973). -3- outcome.” People v Randolph, 502 Mich 1, 9 ; 917 NW2d 249 (2018). | 1 | 2022–2022 |
People v. Petri
green
1 sentence2022“Effective assistance of counsel is presumed and defendant bears the burden of proving otherwise.” Petri, 279 Mich App at 410 ; see also People v Uphaus, 278 Mich App 174, 185 ; 748 NW2d 899 (2008) (“Defendant must overcome a strong presumption that counsel’s performance constituted sound trial strategy.”). | 1 | 2022–2022 |
People v. Gillis
green
2 sentences2016People v Gillis, 474 Mich 105, 113 ; 712 NW2d 419 (2006). 2016People v Gillis, 474 Mich 105, 113 ; 712 NW2d 419 (2006). | 1 | 2016–2016 |
People v. Martin
green
1 sentence2015Id. | 1 | 2015–2015 |
People v. Van Dorsten
green
2 sentences1996People v Van Dorsten, 441 Mich 540, 544-545 ; 494 NW2d 737 (1993); People v Pouncey, 437 Mich 382, 386 ; 471 NW2d 346 (1991). 1996People v Van Dorsten, 441 Mich 540, 544-545 ; 494 NW2d 737 (1993); People v Pouncey, 437 Mich 382, 386 ; 471 NW2d 346 (1991). | 1 | 1996–1996 |
People v. Pouncey
green
2 sentences1996People v Van Dorsten, 441 Mich 540, 544-545 ; 494 NW2d 737 (1993); People v Pouncey, 437 Mich 382, 386 ; 471 NW2d 346 (1991). 1996People v Van Dorsten, 441 Mich 540, 544-545 ; 494 NW2d 737 (1993); People v Pouncey, 437 Mich 382, 386 ; 471 NW2d 346 (1991). | 1 | 1996–1996 |
People v. Hughes
neutral
1 sentence1988However, where defendant has not objected below, "this Court will not reverse the verdict absent manifest injustice, e.g., where the omitted instruction pertains to a basic and controlling issue.” Id. | 1 | 1988–1988 |
People v. Trammell
green
2 sentences1987People v Trammell, 70 Mich App 351, 354 ; 247 NW2d 311 (1976). 1987People v Trammell, 70 Mich App 351, 354 ; 247 NW2d 311 (1976). | 1 | 1987–1987 |
People v. Seabrooks
neutral
2 sentences1986Id., at 454 . 1986Id., at 454 . | 1 | 1986–1986 |
Socha v. Passino
green
2 sentences1984Socha v Passino, 405 Mich 458 ; 275 NW2d 243 (1979); Snow v Freeman, 119 Mich App 677 ; 326 NW2d 602 (1982); Jackovich v General Adjustment Bureau, Inc, 119 Mich App 221 ; 326 NW2d 458 (1982), lv den 417 Mich 1071 (1983); Prentis v Yale Manufacturing Co, 116 Mich App 466 ; 323 NW2d 444 (1982), lv gtd 417 Mich 1039 (1983). *811 First, SJI 65.02 applied. 1984Socha v Passino, 405 Mich 458 ; 275 NW2d 243 (1979); Snow v Freeman, 119 Mich App 677 ; 326 NW2d 602 (1982); Jackovich v General Adjustment Bureau, Inc, 119 Mich App 221 ; 326 NW2d 458 (1982), lv den 417 Mich 1071 (1983); Prentis v Yale Manufacturing Co, 116 Mich App 466 ; 323 NW2d 444 (1982), lv gtd 417 Mich 1039 (1983). *811 First, SJI 65.02 applied. | 1 | 1984–1984 |
Jackovich v. General Adjustment Bureau, Inc
green
2 sentences1984Socha v Passino, 405 Mich 458 ; 275 NW2d 243 (1979); Snow v Freeman, 119 Mich App 677 ; 326 NW2d 602 (1982); Jackovich v General Adjustment Bureau, Inc, 119 Mich App 221 ; 326 NW2d 458 (1982), lv den 417 Mich 1071 (1983); Prentis v Yale Manufacturing Co, 116 Mich App 466 ; 323 NW2d 444 (1982), lv gtd 417 Mich 1039 (1983). *811 First, SJI 65.02 applied. 1984Socha v Passino, 405 Mich 458 ; 275 NW2d 243 (1979); Snow v Freeman, 119 Mich App 677 ; 326 NW2d 602 (1982); Jackovich v General Adjustment Bureau, Inc, 119 Mich App 221 ; 326 NW2d 458 (1982), lv den 417 Mich 1071 (1983); Prentis v Yale Manufacturing Co, 116 Mich App 466 ; 323 NW2d 444 (1982), lv gtd 417 Mich 1039 (1983). *811 First, SJI 65.02 applied. | 1 | 1984–1984 |
Snow v. Freeman
green
2 sentences1984Socha v Passino, 405 Mich 458 ; 275 NW2d 243 (1979); Snow v Freeman, 119 Mich App 677 ; 326 NW2d 602 (1982); Jackovich v General Adjustment Bureau, Inc, 119 Mich App 221 ; 326 NW2d 458 (1982), lv den 417 Mich 1071 (1983); Prentis v Yale Manufacturing Co, 116 Mich App 466 ; 323 NW2d 444 (1982), lv gtd 417 Mich 1039 (1983). *811 First, SJI 65.02 applied. 1984Socha v Passino, 405 Mich 458 ; 275 NW2d 243 (1979); Snow v Freeman, 119 Mich App 677 ; 326 NW2d 602 (1982); Jackovich v General Adjustment Bureau, Inc, 119 Mich App 221 ; 326 NW2d 458 (1982), lv den 417 Mich 1071 (1983); Prentis v Yale Manufacturing Co, 116 Mich App 466 ; 323 NW2d 444 (1982), lv gtd 417 Mich 1039 (1983). *811 First, SJI 65.02 applied. | 1 | 1984–1984 |
Prentis v. Yale Manufacturing Co.
neutral
2 sentences1984Socha v Passino, 405 Mich 458 ; 275 NW2d 243 (1979); Snow v Freeman, 119 Mich App 677 ; 326 NW2d 602 (1982); Jackovich v General Adjustment Bureau, Inc, 119 Mich App 221 ; 326 NW2d 458 (1982), lv den 417 Mich 1071 (1983); Prentis v Yale Manufacturing Co, 116 Mich App 466 ; 323 NW2d 444 (1982), lv gtd 417 Mich 1039 (1983). *811 First, SJI 65.02 applied. 1984Socha v Passino, 405 Mich 458 ; 275 NW2d 243 (1979); Snow v Freeman, 119 Mich App 677 ; 326 NW2d 602 (1982); Jackovich v General Adjustment Bureau, Inc, 119 Mich App 221 ; 326 NW2d 458 (1982), lv den 417 Mich 1071 (1983); Prentis v Yale Manufacturing Co, 116 Mich App 466 ; 323 NW2d 444 (1982), lv gtd 417 Mich 1039 (1983). *811 First, SJI 65.02 applied. | 1 | 1984–1984 |
Javis v. Board of Education of the School District
green
2 sentences1984In Javis v Bd of Ed of School Dist of Ypsilanti, 393 Mich 689, 702 ; 227 NW2d 543 (1975), the Supreme Court ruled that consistent and uniform application of the civil jury instructions requires the following rule: "Where there is an omission of, or a deviation from an applicable and accurate SJI, prejudicial error will be presumed; provided that the erroneously omitted SJI was properly requested at trial; and, provided that in those cases where error is charged as a result of a deviation from a SJI, said deviation was brought to the attention of the trial court prior to the commencement of jur 1984In Javis v Bd of Ed of School Dist of Ypsilanti, 393 Mich 689, 702 ; 227 NW2d 543 (1975), the Supreme Court ruled that consistent and uniform application of the civil jury instructions requires the following rule: "Where there is an omission of, or a deviation from an applicable and accurate SJI, prejudicial error will be presumed; provided that the erroneously omitted SJI was properly requested at trial; and, provided that in those cases where error is charged as a result of a deviation from a SJI, said deviation was brought to the attention of the trial court prior to the commencement of jur | 1 | 1984–1984 |
Chandler v. Heisler
neutral
2 sentences1982In Chandler v Heisler, 153 Mich 1 ; 116 NW 626 (1908), the Court concluded that "although all the proceedings of the establishment of the drain may be regular and not open to complaint on certiorari” where there had been a failure to comply with an additional requirement not stated in the general drain law "there would seem to be no way to protect the rights of the complainant except by the present remedy” — an injunction to restrain construction until the omitted requirement had been complied with. 1982In Chandler v Heisler, 153 Mich 1 ; 116 NW 626 (1908), the Court concluded that "although all the proceedings of the establishment of the drain may be regular and not open to complaint on certiorari” where there had been a failure to comply with an additional requirement not stated in the general drain law "there would seem to be no way to protect the rights of the complainant except by the present remedy” — an injunction to restrain construction until the omitted requirement had been complied with. | 1 | 1982–1982 |
Counted by distinct opinions that both name this issue and are annotated to the section; sections every opinion cites regardless of issue are not filtered here, so read the counts against the total above.
Opinions by the citing court's state. A doctrine retained in one state and abandoned in another shows up here as a year span that stalls.