Already have an account? Sign in instead.
You stay signed in for 30 days on this browser.
Continue with Google Continue with MicrosoftNo account yet? Create a free one.
We sent a six-digit code.
It expires in ten minutes, works once, and only in this browser. Five wrong tries void it. Send another code.
Your account is live and the Cloudflare checks are off for this browser.
6 Louisiana opinions name it 1 courts 2011–2026 2 in the last five years
The cases below were cited by Louisiana courts in a sentence that names this issue. Sides come from how each citing opinion treated the case (Syfertize flag on that citation), so a case can appear on both: that is where the law is contested. A red or yellow chip is the case's own overall treatment.
| Case | Followed | Cited |
|---|---|---|
State v. Lanclosgreen2 sentences2026State v. Santiago, 23-00501, p. 5 (La. 5/10/24), 384 So. 3d 879 , 882; State v. Lanclos, 07-0082, p. 6 (La. 4/8/08), 980 So. 2d 643, 648 . 2023See State v. Lanclos, 07–0082, p. 6 (La. 4/8/08), 980 So.2d 643, 648 . 6 State v. Armstead, 2014-0036, p. 18, (La. | 2 | 4 |
State v. Marlowegreen1 sentence2020App. 4 Cir. 12/22/11), 81 So.3d 944, 966 (noting that the contemporaneous objection rule serves two purposes: “(1) to put the trial court on notice of the alleged irregularity or error, so that the court can cure the error; and (2) to prevent a party from gambling for a favorable outcome and then appealing on errors that could have been addressed by an objection if the outcome is not as hoped”). 2 While we find the trial court erred in its ultimate determination, as stated in our prior writ disposition, the trial court’s oral reasons reflect its adoption of the State’s singular basis for denyi | 1 | 1 |
| Case | Negative | Cited |
|---|---|---|
| No negative-treatment citations attached to this issue in Louisiana. Read the followed side critically anyway. | ||
| Case | Cited | Years |
|---|---|---|
State v. Knott
green
2 sentences2014State v. Knott, 05-2252, p. 2 (La.5/5/06), 928 So.2d 534, 535 . 2011State v. Landos, 2007^0082,36 p. 6 (La.4/8/08), 980 So.2d 643, 648 , citing State v. Knott, 2005-2252 (La.5/5/06), 928 So.2d 534 , and State v. Thomas, 427 So.2d 428 (La.1982). | 2 | 2011–2014 |
State of Louisiana v. Marvin Santiago
neutral
1 sentence2026State v. Santiago, 23-00501, p. 5 (La. 5/10/24), 384 So. 3d 879 , 882; State v. Lanclos, 07-0082, p. 6 (La. 4/8/08), 980 So. 2d 643, 648 . | 1 | 2026–2026 |
State v. Vernon
green
1 sentence2020Id., 16-0692, p. 7, 207 So.3d at 529 . | 1 | 2020–2020 |
State v. Thomas
green
1 sentence2011State v. Landos, 2007^0082,36 p. 6 (La.4/8/08), 980 So.2d 643, 648 , citing State v. Knott, 2005-2252 (La.5/5/06), 928 So.2d 534 , and State v. Thomas, 427 So.2d 428 (La.1982). | 1 | 2011–2011 |
Counted by distinct opinions that both name this issue and are annotated to the section; sections every opinion cites regardless of issue are not filtered here, so read the counts against the total above.
Opinions by the citing court's state. A doctrine retained in one state and abandoned in another shows up here as a year span that stalls.