illustrative list factors (Louisiana) · Go Syfert
← Louisiana issues

illustrative list factors in Louisiana

5 Louisiana opinions name it 2 courts 1978–2017 0 in the last five years

The cases below were cited by Louisiana courts in a sentence that names this issue. Sides come from how each citing opinion treated the case (Syfertize flag on that citation), so a case can appear on both: that is where the law is contested. A red or yellow chip is the case's own overall treatment.

Followed or applied (0)

CaseFollowedCited
No positive-treatment citations attached to this issue in Louisiana.

Distinguished, questioned or overruled (0)

CaseNegativeCited
No negative-treatment citations attached to this issue in Louisiana. Read the followed side critically anyway.

Also cited on this issue (5)

CaseCitedYears
State v. Hearold green
la · 1992
2 sentences

2017Id. (quoting Hearold, 603 So.2d at 735 ).

2017Id. (quoting Hearold, 603 So.2d at 735 ).

12017–2017
Weaver v. Weaver green
lactapp · 2002
1 sentence

2005One of the factors a court must consider, if it is relevant, is "[t]he reasonable preference of the child, if the court deems the child to be of sufficient age to express a preference." Id.

12005–2005
Vickers v. Wellbrink neutral
lactapp · 1992
1 sentence

1998Vickers, supra at 696 .

11998–1998
State v. Deskins green
kan · 1983
1 sentence

1988An illustrative list of factors to be considered in making this determination were set forth in State v. Deskins, 673 P.2d 1174 (Kan.1983).

11988–1988
Louis West v. United States green
ca5 · 1968
1 sentence

1978This Court has not expressly stated under what circumstances a juvenile may be deemed to have knowingly and intelligently waived his privilege against self-incrimination and his right to retained or appointed counsel. [11] One Louisiana court of appeal [12] has taken the position that the age of a person under interrogation does not necessarily require additional protections and has employed a "totality of circumstances" test similar to that articulated in West v. United States. [13] That test consists of an illustrative list of factors to be considered in determining *591 whether a juvenile h

11978–1978

Where else courts name it

LA 5 (1978–2017) PA 2 (1980–1986) UT 2 (1999–1999)

Opinions by the citing court's state. A doctrine retained in one state and abandoned in another shows up here as a year span that stalls.

← Caselaw search · G Cite Topics · Brief Check