6 Louisiana opinions name it 2 courts 1978–2008 0 in the last five years
The cases below were cited by Louisiana courts in a sentence that names this issue. Sides come from how each citing opinion treated the case (Syfertize flag on that citation), so a case can appear on both: that is where the law is contested. A red or yellow chip is the case's own overall treatment.
| Case | Followed | Cited |
|---|---|---|
Jaubert v. Crowley Post-Signal, Inc.green2 sentences1996Jaubert v. Crowley Post-Signal, Inc., 375 So.2d 1386 (La.1979). 1987Jaubert v. Crowley Post-Signal, Inc., 375 So.2d 1386, 1388 (La.1979). | 1 | 2 |
Puma v. Sullivangreen1 sentence2008See Puma v. Sullivan, 746 A.2d 871, 875 (D.C.2000) (statement not offered to prove the truth of the matter asserted is not hearsay)." Thus, in light of the above jurisprudence, there was competent evidence that issues of material fact precluded granting summary judgment. | 1 | 1 |
Little v. Stategreen2 sentences2000L.Rev. 295 (1990) (labeling the three types of privacy rights as "search and seizure," "disclosural," and "autonomy" rights, and proposing that the invasion of privacy clause was meant to expand protection in the latter two categories.) [15] See Ingersoll v. Palmer, 43 Cal.3d 1321 , 241 Cal.Rptr. 42 , 743 P.2d 1299 (1987); Nelson v. Lane County, 304 Or. 97 , 743 P.2d 692 (1987); State v. Garcia, 500 N.E.2d 158 (Ind.), cert. denied, 481 U.S. 1014 , 107 S.Ct. 1889 , 95 L.Ed.2d 496 (1987); Little v. State, 300 Md. 485 , 479 A.2d 903 (1984); State v. Deskins, 234 Kan. 529 , 673 P.2d 1174 (1983); s 2000L.Rev. 295 (1990) (labeling the three types of privacy rights as "search and seizure," "disclosural," and "autonomy" rights, and proposing that the invasion of privacy clause was meant to expand protection in the latter two categories.) [15] See Ingersoll v. Palmer, 43 Cal.3d 1321 , 241 Cal.Rptr. 42 , 743 P.2d 1299 (1987); Nelson v. Lane County, 304 Or. 97 , 743 P.2d 692 (1987); State v. Garcia, 500 N.E.2d 158 (Ind.), cert. denied, 481 U.S. 1014 , 107 S.Ct. 1889 , 95 L.Ed.2d 496 (1987); Little v. State, 300 Md. 485 , 479 A.2d 903 (1984); State v. Deskins, 234 Kan. 529 , 673 P.2d 1174 (1983); s | 1 | 1 |
State v. Deskinsgreen2 sentences2000L.Rev. 295 (1990) (labeling the three types of privacy rights as "search and seizure," "disclosural," and "autonomy" rights, and proposing that the invasion of privacy clause was meant to expand protection in the latter two categories.) [15] See Ingersoll v. Palmer, 43 Cal.3d 1321 , 241 Cal.Rptr. 42 , 743 P.2d 1299 (1987); Nelson v. Lane County, 304 Or. 97 , 743 P.2d 692 (1987); State v. Garcia, 500 N.E.2d 158 (Ind.), cert. denied, 481 U.S. 1014 , 107 S.Ct. 1889 , 95 L.Ed.2d 496 (1987); Little v. State, 300 Md. 485 , 479 A.2d 903 (1984); State v. Deskins, 234 Kan. 529 , 673 P.2d 1174 (1983); s 2000L.Rev. 295 (1990) (labeling the three types of privacy rights as "search and seizure," "disclosural," and "autonomy" rights, and proposing that the invasion of privacy clause was meant to expand protection in the latter two categories.) [15] See Ingersoll v. Palmer, 43 Cal.3d 1321 , 241 Cal.Rptr. 42 , 743 P.2d 1299 (1987); Nelson v. Lane County, 304 Or. 97 , 743 P.2d 692 (1987); State v. Garcia, 500 N.E.2d 158 (Ind.), cert. denied, 481 U.S. 1014 , 107 S.Ct. 1889 , 95 L.Ed.2d 496 (1987); Little v. State, 300 Md. 485 , 479 A.2d 903 (1984); State v. Deskins, 234 Kan. 529 , 673 P.2d 1174 (1983); s | 1 | 1 |
LaFontaine v. Stategreen2 sentences2000L.Rev. 295 (1990) (labeling the three types of privacy rights as "search and seizure," "disclosural," and "autonomy" rights, and proposing that the invasion of privacy clause was meant to expand protection in the latter two categories.) [15] See Ingersoll v. Palmer, 43 Cal.3d 1321 , 241 Cal.Rptr. 42 , 743 P.2d 1299 (1987); Nelson v. Lane County, 304 Or. 97 , 743 P.2d 692 (1987); State v. Garcia, 500 N.E.2d 158 (Ind.), cert. denied, 481 U.S. 1014 , 107 S.Ct. 1889 , 95 L.Ed.2d 496 (1987); Little v. State, 300 Md. 485 , 479 A.2d 903 (1984); State v. Deskins, 234 Kan. 529 , 673 P.2d 1174 (1983); s 2000L.Rev. 295 (1990) (labeling the three types of privacy rights as "search and seizure," "disclosural," and "autonomy" rights, and proposing that the invasion of privacy clause was meant to expand protection in the latter two categories.) [15] See Ingersoll v. Palmer, 43 Cal.3d 1321 , 241 Cal.Rptr. 42 , 743 P.2d 1299 (1987); Nelson v. Lane County, 304 Or. 97 , 743 P.2d 692 (1987); State v. Garcia, 500 N.E.2d 158 (Ind.), cert. denied, 481 U.S. 1014 , 107 S.Ct. 1889 , 95 L.Ed.2d 496 (1987); Little v. State, 300 Md. 485 , 479 A.2d 903 (1984); State v. Deskins, 234 Kan. 529 , 673 P.2d 1174 (1983); s | 1 | 1 |
| Case | Negative | Cited |
|---|---|---|
| No negative-treatment citations attached to this issue in Louisiana. Read the followed side critically anyway. | ||
| Case | Cited | Years |
|---|---|---|
Nelson v. Lane County
green
2 sentences2000L.Rev. 295 (1990) (labeling the three types of privacy rights as "search and seizure," "disclosural," and "autonomy" rights, and proposing that the invasion of privacy clause was meant to expand protection in the latter two categories.) [15] See Ingersoll v. Palmer, 43 Cal.3d 1321 , 241 Cal.Rptr. 42 , 743 P.2d 1299 (1987); Nelson v. Lane County, 304 Or. 97 , 743 P.2d 692 (1987); State v. Garcia, 500 N.E.2d 158 (Ind.), cert. denied, 481 U.S. 1014 , 107 S.Ct. 1889 , 95 L.Ed.2d 496 (1987); Little v. State, 300 Md. 485 , 479 A.2d 903 (1984); State v. Deskins, 234 Kan. 529 , 673 P.2d 1174 (1983); s 2000L.Rev. 295 (1990) (labeling the three types of privacy rights as "search and seizure," "disclosural," and "autonomy" rights, and proposing that the invasion of privacy clause was meant to expand protection in the latter two categories.) [15] See Ingersoll v. Palmer, 43 Cal.3d 1321 , 241 Cal.Rptr. 42 , 743 P.2d 1299 (1987); Nelson v. Lane County, 304 Or. 97 , 743 P.2d 692 (1987); State v. Garcia, 500 N.E.2d 158 (Ind.), cert. denied, 481 U.S. 1014 , 107 S.Ct. 1889 , 95 L.Ed.2d 496 (1987); Little v. State, 300 Md. 485 , 479 A.2d 903 (1984); State v. Deskins, 234 Kan. 529 , 673 P.2d 1174 (1983); s | 1 | 2000–2000 |
Ingersoll v. Palmer
green
2 sentences2000L.Rev. 295 (1990) (labeling the three types of privacy rights as "search and seizure," "disclosural," and "autonomy" rights, and proposing that the invasion of privacy clause was meant to expand protection in the latter two categories.) [15] See Ingersoll v. Palmer, 43 Cal.3d 1321 , 241 Cal.Rptr. 42 , 743 P.2d 1299 (1987); Nelson v. Lane County, 304 Or. 97 , 743 P.2d 692 (1987); State v. Garcia, 500 N.E.2d 158 (Ind.), cert. denied, 481 U.S. 1014 , 107 S.Ct. 1889 , 95 L.Ed.2d 496 (1987); Little v. State, 300 Md. 485 , 479 A.2d 903 (1984); State v. Deskins, 234 Kan. 529 , 673 P.2d 1174 (1983); s 2000L.Rev. 295 (1990) (labeling the three types of privacy rights as "search and seizure," "disclosural," and "autonomy" rights, and proposing that the invasion of privacy clause was meant to expand protection in the latter two categories.) [15] See Ingersoll v. Palmer, 43 Cal.3d 1321 , 241 Cal.Rptr. 42 , 743 P.2d 1299 (1987); Nelson v. Lane County, 304 Or. 97 , 743 P.2d 692 (1987); State v. Garcia, 500 N.E.2d 158 (Ind.), cert. denied, 481 U.S. 1014 , 107 S.Ct. 1889 , 95 L.Ed.2d 496 (1987); Little v. State, 300 Md. 485 , 479 A.2d 903 (1984); State v. Deskins, 234 Kan. 529 , 673 P.2d 1174 (1983); s | 1 | 2000–2000 |
City of Las Cruces v. Betancourt
green
2 sentences2000L.Rev. 295 (1990) (labeling the three types of privacy rights as "search and seizure," "disclosural," and "autonomy" rights, and proposing that the invasion of privacy clause was meant to expand protection in the latter two categories.) [15] See Ingersoll v. Palmer, 43 Cal.3d 1321 , 241 Cal.Rptr. 42 , 743 P.2d 1299 (1987); Nelson v. Lane County, 304 Or. 97 , 743 P.2d 692 (1987); State v. Garcia, 500 N.E.2d 158 (Ind.), cert. denied, 481 U.S. 1014 , 107 S.Ct. 1889 , 95 L.Ed.2d 496 (1987); Little v. State, 300 Md. 485 , 479 A.2d 903 (1984); State v. Deskins, 234 Kan. 529 , 673 P.2d 1174 (1983); s 2000L.Rev. 295 (1990) (labeling the three types of privacy rights as "search and seizure," "disclosural," and "autonomy" rights, and proposing that the invasion of privacy clause was meant to expand protection in the latter two categories.) [15] See Ingersoll v. Palmer, 43 Cal.3d 1321 , 241 Cal.Rptr. 42 , 743 P.2d 1299 (1987); Nelson v. Lane County, 304 Or. 97 , 743 P.2d 692 (1987); State v. Garcia, 500 N.E.2d 158 (Ind.), cert. denied, 481 U.S. 1014 , 107 S.Ct. 1889 , 95 L.Ed.2d 496 (1987); Little v. State, 300 Md. 485 , 479 A.2d 903 (1984); State v. Deskins, 234 Kan. 529 , 673 P.2d 1174 (1983); s | 1 | 2000–2000 |
State v. Garcia
green
1 sentence2000L.Rev. 295 (1990) (labeling the three types of privacy rights as "search and seizure," "disclosural," and "autonomy" rights, and proposing that the invasion of privacy clause was meant to expand protection in the latter two categories.) [15] See Ingersoll v. Palmer, 43 Cal.3d 1321 , 241 Cal.Rptr. 42 , 743 P.2d 1299 (1987); Nelson v. Lane County, 304 Or. 97 , 743 P.2d 692 (1987); State v. Garcia, 500 N.E.2d 158 (Ind.), cert. denied, 481 U.S. 1014 , 107 S.Ct. 1889 , 95 L.Ed.2d 496 (1987); Little v. State, 300 Md. 485 , 479 A.2d 903 (1984); State v. Deskins, 234 Kan. 529 , 673 P.2d 1174 (1983); s | 1 | 2000–2000 |
Canisius College v. United States
green
1 sentence2000L.Rev. 295 (1990) (labeling the three types of privacy rights as "search and seizure," "disclosural," and "autonomy" rights, and proposing that the invasion of privacy clause was meant to expand protection in the latter two categories.) [15] See Ingersoll v. Palmer, 43 Cal.3d 1321 , 241 Cal.Rptr. 42 , 743 P.2d 1299 (1987); Nelson v. Lane County, 304 Or. 97 , 743 P.2d 692 (1987); State v. Garcia, 500 N.E.2d 158 (Ind.), cert. denied, 481 U.S. 1014 , 107 S.Ct. 1889 , 95 L.Ed.2d 496 (1987); Little v. State, 300 Md. 485 , 479 A.2d 903 (1984); State v. Deskins, 234 Kan. 529 , 673 P.2d 1174 (1983); s | 1 | 2000–2000 |
Roth Steel Tube Co. v. Commissioner
green
1 sentence2000L.Rev. 295 (1990) (labeling the three types of privacy rights as "search and seizure," "disclosural," and "autonomy" rights, and proposing that the invasion of privacy clause was meant to expand protection in the latter two categories.) [15] See Ingersoll v. Palmer, 43 Cal.3d 1321 , 241 Cal.Rptr. 42 , 743 P.2d 1299 (1987); Nelson v. Lane County, 304 Or. 97 , 743 P.2d 692 (1987); State v. Garcia, 500 N.E.2d 158 (Ind.), cert. denied, 481 U.S. 1014 , 107 S.Ct. 1889 , 95 L.Ed.2d 496 (1987); Little v. State, 300 Md. 485 , 479 A.2d 903 (1984); State v. Deskins, 234 Kan. 529 , 673 P.2d 1174 (1983); s | 1 | 2000–2000 |
County of Mariposa v. United States
green
1 sentence2000L.Rev. 295 (1990) (labeling the three types of privacy rights as "search and seizure," "disclosural," and "autonomy" rights, and proposing that the invasion of privacy clause was meant to expand protection in the latter two categories.) [15] See Ingersoll v. Palmer, 43 Cal.3d 1321 , 241 Cal.Rptr. 42 , 743 P.2d 1299 (1987); Nelson v. Lane County, 304 Or. 97 , 743 P.2d 692 (1987); State v. Garcia, 500 N.E.2d 158 (Ind.), cert. denied, 481 U.S. 1014 , 107 S.Ct. 1889 , 95 L.Ed.2d 496 (1987); Little v. State, 300 Md. 485 , 479 A.2d 903 (1984); State v. Deskins, 234 Kan. 529 , 673 P.2d 1174 (1983); s | 1 | 2000–2000 |
Romero v. Thomson Newspapers
green
1 sentence1998See Romero v. Thomson Newspapers, 94-1105 (La.1/17/95); 648 So.2d 866 , cert. denied, 515 U.S. 1131 , 115 S.Ct. 2556 , 132 L.Ed.2d 810 (La.1995). | 1 | 1998–1998 |
Bussey v. Owens
green
1 sentence1998See Romero v. Thomson Newspapers, 94-1105 (La.1/17/95); 648 So.2d 866 , cert. denied, 515 U.S. 1131 , 115 S.Ct. 2556 , 132 L.Ed.2d 810 (La.1995). | 1 | 1998–1998 |
Southern Crown, Inc. v. Board of Adjustment
green
1 sentence1998See Romero v. Thomson Newspapers, 94-1105 (La.1/17/95); 648 So.2d 866 , cert. denied, 515 U.S. 1131 , 115 S.Ct. 2556 , 132 L.Ed.2d 810 (La.1995). | 1 | 1998–1998 |
Zerman v. Greene
green
1 sentence1998See Romero v. Thomson Newspapers, 94-1105 (La.1/17/95); 648 So.2d 866 , cert. denied, 515 U.S. 1131 , 115 S.Ct. 2556 , 132 L.Ed.2d 810 (La.1995). | 1 | 1998–1998 |
Lucas v. Ludwig
green
1 sentence1978If the defendant's conduct is unreasonable and seriously interferes with plaintiff's privacy the invasion is actionable." This tort has usually been associated with conduct falling into one or more of the following classifications: (1) Intrusion ( Lucas v. Ludwig, 313 So.2d 12 (La.App. 4 Cir. 1975), certiorari denied, 318 So.2d 42 [La.]); (2) Public disclosure of private facts ( Lambert v. Dow Chemical Co., 215 So.2d 673 (La.App. 1 Cir. 1968); Hamilton v. Lumbermen's Mutual Cas. | 1 | 1978–1978 |
Lucas v. Ludwig
green
1 sentence1978If the defendant's conduct is unreasonable and seriously interferes with plaintiff's privacy the invasion is actionable." This tort has usually been associated with conduct falling into one or more of the following classifications: (1) Intrusion ( Lucas v. Ludwig, 313 So.2d 12 (La.App. 4 Cir. 1975), certiorari denied, 318 So.2d 42 [La.]); (2) Public disclosure of private facts ( Lambert v. Dow Chemical Co., 215 So.2d 673 (La.App. 1 Cir. 1968); Hamilton v. Lumbermen's Mutual Cas. | 1 | 1978–1978 |
Lambert v. Dow Chemical Company
green
1 sentence1978If the defendant's conduct is unreasonable and seriously interferes with plaintiff's privacy the invasion is actionable." This tort has usually been associated with conduct falling into one or more of the following classifications: (1) Intrusion ( Lucas v. Ludwig, 313 So.2d 12 (La.App. 4 Cir. 1975), certiorari denied, 318 So.2d 42 [La.]); (2) Public disclosure of private facts ( Lambert v. Dow Chemical Co., 215 So.2d 673 (La.App. 1 Cir. 1968); Hamilton v. Lumbermen's Mutual Cas. | 1 | 1978–1978 |
Opinions by the citing court's state. A doctrine retained in one state and abandoned in another shows up here as a year span that stalls.