invasion of privacy clause (Louisiana) · Go Syfert
← Louisiana issues

invasion of privacy clause in Louisiana

6 Louisiana opinions name it 2 courts 1978–2008 0 in the last five years

The cases below were cited by Louisiana courts in a sentence that names this issue. Sides come from how each citing opinion treated the case (Syfertize flag on that citation), so a case can appear on both: that is where the law is contested. A red or yellow chip is the case's own overall treatment.

Followed or applied (5)

CaseFollowedCited
Jaubert v. Crowley Post-Signal, Inc.green
la · 1979 · cited in 2 Louisiana opinions naming this issue, 1987–1996
2 sentences

1996Jaubert v. Crowley Post-Signal, Inc., 375 So.2d 1386 (La.1979).

1987Jaubert v. Crowley Post-Signal, Inc., 375 So.2d 1386, 1388 (La.1979).

12
Puma v. Sullivangreen
dc · 2000 · cited in 1 Louisiana opinions naming this issue, 2008–2008
1 sentence

2008See Puma v. Sullivan, 746 A.2d 871, 875 (D.C.2000) (statement not offered to prove the truth of the matter asserted is not hearsay)." Thus, in light of the above jurisprudence, there was competent evidence that issues of material fact precluded granting summary judgment.

11
Little v. Stategreen
md · 1984 · cited in 1 Louisiana opinions naming this issue, 2000–2000
2 sentences

2000L.Rev. 295 (1990) (labeling the three types of privacy rights as "search and seizure," "disclosural," and "autonomy" rights, and proposing that the invasion of privacy clause was meant to expand protection in the latter two categories.) [15] See Ingersoll v. Palmer, 43 Cal.3d 1321 , 241 Cal.Rptr. 42 , 743 P.2d 1299 (1987); Nelson v. Lane County, 304 Or. 97 , 743 P.2d 692 (1987); State v. Garcia, 500 N.E.2d 158 (Ind.), cert. denied, 481 U.S. 1014 , 107 S.Ct. 1889 , 95 L.Ed.2d 496 (1987); Little v. State, 300 Md. 485 , 479 A.2d 903 (1984); State v. Deskins, 234 Kan. 529 , 673 P.2d 1174 (1983); s

2000L.Rev. 295 (1990) (labeling the three types of privacy rights as "search and seizure," "disclosural," and "autonomy" rights, and proposing that the invasion of privacy clause was meant to expand protection in the latter two categories.) [15] See Ingersoll v. Palmer, 43 Cal.3d 1321 , 241 Cal.Rptr. 42 , 743 P.2d 1299 (1987); Nelson v. Lane County, 304 Or. 97 , 743 P.2d 692 (1987); State v. Garcia, 500 N.E.2d 158 (Ind.), cert. denied, 481 U.S. 1014 , 107 S.Ct. 1889 , 95 L.Ed.2d 496 (1987); Little v. State, 300 Md. 485 , 479 A.2d 903 (1984); State v. Deskins, 234 Kan. 529 , 673 P.2d 1174 (1983); s

11
State v. Deskinsgreen
kan · 1983 · cited in 1 Louisiana opinions naming this issue, 2000–2000
2 sentences

2000L.Rev. 295 (1990) (labeling the three types of privacy rights as "search and seizure," "disclosural," and "autonomy" rights, and proposing that the invasion of privacy clause was meant to expand protection in the latter two categories.) [15] See Ingersoll v. Palmer, 43 Cal.3d 1321 , 241 Cal.Rptr. 42 , 743 P.2d 1299 (1987); Nelson v. Lane County, 304 Or. 97 , 743 P.2d 692 (1987); State v. Garcia, 500 N.E.2d 158 (Ind.), cert. denied, 481 U.S. 1014 , 107 S.Ct. 1889 , 95 L.Ed.2d 496 (1987); Little v. State, 300 Md. 485 , 479 A.2d 903 (1984); State v. Deskins, 234 Kan. 529 , 673 P.2d 1174 (1983); s

2000L.Rev. 295 (1990) (labeling the three types of privacy rights as "search and seizure," "disclosural," and "autonomy" rights, and proposing that the invasion of privacy clause was meant to expand protection in the latter two categories.) [15] See Ingersoll v. Palmer, 43 Cal.3d 1321 , 241 Cal.Rptr. 42 , 743 P.2d 1299 (1987); Nelson v. Lane County, 304 Or. 97 , 743 P.2d 692 (1987); State v. Garcia, 500 N.E.2d 158 (Ind.), cert. denied, 481 U.S. 1014 , 107 S.Ct. 1889 , 95 L.Ed.2d 496 (1987); Little v. State, 300 Md. 485 , 479 A.2d 903 (1984); State v. Deskins, 234 Kan. 529 , 673 P.2d 1174 (1983); s

11
LaFontaine v. Stategreen
ga · 1998 · cited in 1 Louisiana opinions naming this issue, 2000–2000
2 sentences

2000L.Rev. 295 (1990) (labeling the three types of privacy rights as "search and seizure," "disclosural," and "autonomy" rights, and proposing that the invasion of privacy clause was meant to expand protection in the latter two categories.) [15] See Ingersoll v. Palmer, 43 Cal.3d 1321 , 241 Cal.Rptr. 42 , 743 P.2d 1299 (1987); Nelson v. Lane County, 304 Or. 97 , 743 P.2d 692 (1987); State v. Garcia, 500 N.E.2d 158 (Ind.), cert. denied, 481 U.S. 1014 , 107 S.Ct. 1889 , 95 L.Ed.2d 496 (1987); Little v. State, 300 Md. 485 , 479 A.2d 903 (1984); State v. Deskins, 234 Kan. 529 , 673 P.2d 1174 (1983); s

2000L.Rev. 295 (1990) (labeling the three types of privacy rights as "search and seizure," "disclosural," and "autonomy" rights, and proposing that the invasion of privacy clause was meant to expand protection in the latter two categories.) [15] See Ingersoll v. Palmer, 43 Cal.3d 1321 , 241 Cal.Rptr. 42 , 743 P.2d 1299 (1987); Nelson v. Lane County, 304 Or. 97 , 743 P.2d 692 (1987); State v. Garcia, 500 N.E.2d 158 (Ind.), cert. denied, 481 U.S. 1014 , 107 S.Ct. 1889 , 95 L.Ed.2d 496 (1987); Little v. State, 300 Md. 485 , 479 A.2d 903 (1984); State v. Deskins, 234 Kan. 529 , 673 P.2d 1174 (1983); s

11

Distinguished, questioned or overruled (0)

CaseNegativeCited
No negative-treatment citations attached to this issue in Louisiana. Read the followed side critically anyway.

Also cited on this issue (14)

CaseCitedYears
Nelson v. Lane County green
or · 1987
2 sentences

2000L.Rev. 295 (1990) (labeling the three types of privacy rights as "search and seizure," "disclosural," and "autonomy" rights, and proposing that the invasion of privacy clause was meant to expand protection in the latter two categories.) [15] See Ingersoll v. Palmer, 43 Cal.3d 1321 , 241 Cal.Rptr. 42 , 743 P.2d 1299 (1987); Nelson v. Lane County, 304 Or. 97 , 743 P.2d 692 (1987); State v. Garcia, 500 N.E.2d 158 (Ind.), cert. denied, 481 U.S. 1014 , 107 S.Ct. 1889 , 95 L.Ed.2d 496 (1987); Little v. State, 300 Md. 485 , 479 A.2d 903 (1984); State v. Deskins, 234 Kan. 529 , 673 P.2d 1174 (1983); s

2000L.Rev. 295 (1990) (labeling the three types of privacy rights as "search and seizure," "disclosural," and "autonomy" rights, and proposing that the invasion of privacy clause was meant to expand protection in the latter two categories.) [15] See Ingersoll v. Palmer, 43 Cal.3d 1321 , 241 Cal.Rptr. 42 , 743 P.2d 1299 (1987); Nelson v. Lane County, 304 Or. 97 , 743 P.2d 692 (1987); State v. Garcia, 500 N.E.2d 158 (Ind.), cert. denied, 481 U.S. 1014 , 107 S.Ct. 1889 , 95 L.Ed.2d 496 (1987); Little v. State, 300 Md. 485 , 479 A.2d 903 (1984); State v. Deskins, 234 Kan. 529 , 673 P.2d 1174 (1983); s

12000–2000
Ingersoll v. Palmer green
cal · 1987
2 sentences

2000L.Rev. 295 (1990) (labeling the three types of privacy rights as "search and seizure," "disclosural," and "autonomy" rights, and proposing that the invasion of privacy clause was meant to expand protection in the latter two categories.) [15] See Ingersoll v. Palmer, 43 Cal.3d 1321 , 241 Cal.Rptr. 42 , 743 P.2d 1299 (1987); Nelson v. Lane County, 304 Or. 97 , 743 P.2d 692 (1987); State v. Garcia, 500 N.E.2d 158 (Ind.), cert. denied, 481 U.S. 1014 , 107 S.Ct. 1889 , 95 L.Ed.2d 496 (1987); Little v. State, 300 Md. 485 , 479 A.2d 903 (1984); State v. Deskins, 234 Kan. 529 , 673 P.2d 1174 (1983); s

2000L.Rev. 295 (1990) (labeling the three types of privacy rights as "search and seizure," "disclosural," and "autonomy" rights, and proposing that the invasion of privacy clause was meant to expand protection in the latter two categories.) [15] See Ingersoll v. Palmer, 43 Cal.3d 1321 , 241 Cal.Rptr. 42 , 743 P.2d 1299 (1987); Nelson v. Lane County, 304 Or. 97 , 743 P.2d 692 (1987); State v. Garcia, 500 N.E.2d 158 (Ind.), cert. denied, 481 U.S. 1014 , 107 S.Ct. 1889 , 95 L.Ed.2d 496 (1987); Little v. State, 300 Md. 485 , 479 A.2d 903 (1984); State v. Deskins, 234 Kan. 529 , 673 P.2d 1174 (1983); s

12000–2000
City of Las Cruces v. Betancourt green
nmctapp · 1987
2 sentences

2000L.Rev. 295 (1990) (labeling the three types of privacy rights as "search and seizure," "disclosural," and "autonomy" rights, and proposing that the invasion of privacy clause was meant to expand protection in the latter two categories.) [15] See Ingersoll v. Palmer, 43 Cal.3d 1321 , 241 Cal.Rptr. 42 , 743 P.2d 1299 (1987); Nelson v. Lane County, 304 Or. 97 , 743 P.2d 692 (1987); State v. Garcia, 500 N.E.2d 158 (Ind.), cert. denied, 481 U.S. 1014 , 107 S.Ct. 1889 , 95 L.Ed.2d 496 (1987); Little v. State, 300 Md. 485 , 479 A.2d 903 (1984); State v. Deskins, 234 Kan. 529 , 673 P.2d 1174 (1983); s

2000L.Rev. 295 (1990) (labeling the three types of privacy rights as "search and seizure," "disclosural," and "autonomy" rights, and proposing that the invasion of privacy clause was meant to expand protection in the latter two categories.) [15] See Ingersoll v. Palmer, 43 Cal.3d 1321 , 241 Cal.Rptr. 42 , 743 P.2d 1299 (1987); Nelson v. Lane County, 304 Or. 97 , 743 P.2d 692 (1987); State v. Garcia, 500 N.E.2d 158 (Ind.), cert. denied, 481 U.S. 1014 , 107 S.Ct. 1889 , 95 L.Ed.2d 496 (1987); Little v. State, 300 Md. 485 , 479 A.2d 903 (1984); State v. Deskins, 234 Kan. 529 , 673 P.2d 1174 (1983); s

12000–2000
State v. Garcia green
ind · 1986
1 sentence

2000L.Rev. 295 (1990) (labeling the three types of privacy rights as "search and seizure," "disclosural," and "autonomy" rights, and proposing that the invasion of privacy clause was meant to expand protection in the latter two categories.) [15] See Ingersoll v. Palmer, 43 Cal.3d 1321 , 241 Cal.Rptr. 42 , 743 P.2d 1299 (1987); Nelson v. Lane County, 304 Or. 97 , 743 P.2d 692 (1987); State v. Garcia, 500 N.E.2d 158 (Ind.), cert. denied, 481 U.S. 1014 , 107 S.Ct. 1889 , 95 L.Ed.2d 496 (1987); Little v. State, 300 Md. 485 , 479 A.2d 903 (1984); State v. Deskins, 234 Kan. 529 , 673 P.2d 1174 (1983); s

12000–2000
Canisius College v. United States green
scotus · 1987
1 sentence

2000L.Rev. 295 (1990) (labeling the three types of privacy rights as "search and seizure," "disclosural," and "autonomy" rights, and proposing that the invasion of privacy clause was meant to expand protection in the latter two categories.) [15] See Ingersoll v. Palmer, 43 Cal.3d 1321 , 241 Cal.Rptr. 42 , 743 P.2d 1299 (1987); Nelson v. Lane County, 304 Or. 97 , 743 P.2d 692 (1987); State v. Garcia, 500 N.E.2d 158 (Ind.), cert. denied, 481 U.S. 1014 , 107 S.Ct. 1889 , 95 L.Ed.2d 496 (1987); Little v. State, 300 Md. 485 , 479 A.2d 903 (1984); State v. Deskins, 234 Kan. 529 , 673 P.2d 1174 (1983); s

12000–2000
Roth Steel Tube Co. v. Commissioner green
scotus · 1987
1 sentence

2000L.Rev. 295 (1990) (labeling the three types of privacy rights as "search and seizure," "disclosural," and "autonomy" rights, and proposing that the invasion of privacy clause was meant to expand protection in the latter two categories.) [15] See Ingersoll v. Palmer, 43 Cal.3d 1321 , 241 Cal.Rptr. 42 , 743 P.2d 1299 (1987); Nelson v. Lane County, 304 Or. 97 , 743 P.2d 692 (1987); State v. Garcia, 500 N.E.2d 158 (Ind.), cert. denied, 481 U.S. 1014 , 107 S.Ct. 1889 , 95 L.Ed.2d 496 (1987); Little v. State, 300 Md. 485 , 479 A.2d 903 (1984); State v. Deskins, 234 Kan. 529 , 673 P.2d 1174 (1983); s

12000–2000
County of Mariposa v. United States green
scotus · 1987
1 sentence

2000L.Rev. 295 (1990) (labeling the three types of privacy rights as "search and seizure," "disclosural," and "autonomy" rights, and proposing that the invasion of privacy clause was meant to expand protection in the latter two categories.) [15] See Ingersoll v. Palmer, 43 Cal.3d 1321 , 241 Cal.Rptr. 42 , 743 P.2d 1299 (1987); Nelson v. Lane County, 304 Or. 97 , 743 P.2d 692 (1987); State v. Garcia, 500 N.E.2d 158 (Ind.), cert. denied, 481 U.S. 1014 , 107 S.Ct. 1889 , 95 L.Ed.2d 496 (1987); Little v. State, 300 Md. 485 , 479 A.2d 903 (1984); State v. Deskins, 234 Kan. 529 , 673 P.2d 1174 (1983); s

12000–2000
Romero v. Thomson Newspapers green
la · 1995
1 sentence

1998See Romero v. Thomson Newspapers, 94-1105 (La.1/17/95); 648 So.2d 866 , cert. denied, 515 U.S. 1131 , 115 S.Ct. 2556 , 132 L.Ed.2d 810 (La.1995).

11998–1998
Bussey v. Owens green
scotus · 1995
1 sentence

1998See Romero v. Thomson Newspapers, 94-1105 (La.1/17/95); 648 So.2d 866 , cert. denied, 515 U.S. 1131 , 115 S.Ct. 2556 , 132 L.Ed.2d 810 (La.1995).

11998–1998
Southern Crown, Inc. v. Board of Adjustment green
scotus · 1995
1 sentence

1998See Romero v. Thomson Newspapers, 94-1105 (La.1/17/95); 648 So.2d 866 , cert. denied, 515 U.S. 1131 , 115 S.Ct. 2556 , 132 L.Ed.2d 810 (La.1995).

11998–1998
Zerman v. Greene green
scotus · 1995
1 sentence

1998See Romero v. Thomson Newspapers, 94-1105 (La.1/17/95); 648 So.2d 866 , cert. denied, 515 U.S. 1131 , 115 S.Ct. 2556 , 132 L.Ed.2d 810 (La.1995).

11998–1998
Lucas v. Ludwig green
la · 1975
1 sentence

1978If the defendant's conduct is unreasonable and seriously interferes with plaintiff's privacy the invasion is actionable." This tort has usually been associated with conduct falling into one or more of the following classifications: (1) Intrusion ( Lucas v. Ludwig, 313 So.2d 12 (La.App. 4 Cir. 1975), certiorari denied, 318 So.2d 42 [La.]); (2) Public disclosure of private facts ( Lambert v. Dow Chemical Co., 215 So.2d 673 (La.App. 1 Cir. 1968); Hamilton v. Lumbermen's Mutual Cas.

11978–1978
Lucas v. Ludwig green
lactapp · 1975
1 sentence

1978If the defendant's conduct is unreasonable and seriously interferes with plaintiff's privacy the invasion is actionable." This tort has usually been associated with conduct falling into one or more of the following classifications: (1) Intrusion ( Lucas v. Ludwig, 313 So.2d 12 (La.App. 4 Cir. 1975), certiorari denied, 318 So.2d 42 [La.]); (2) Public disclosure of private facts ( Lambert v. Dow Chemical Co., 215 So.2d 673 (La.App. 1 Cir. 1968); Hamilton v. Lumbermen's Mutual Cas.

11978–1978
Lambert v. Dow Chemical Company green
lactapp · 1968
1 sentence

1978If the defendant's conduct is unreasonable and seriously interferes with plaintiff's privacy the invasion is actionable." This tort has usually been associated with conduct falling into one or more of the following classifications: (1) Intrusion ( Lucas v. Ludwig, 313 So.2d 12 (La.App. 4 Cir. 1975), certiorari denied, 318 So.2d 42 [La.]); (2) Public disclosure of private facts ( Lambert v. Dow Chemical Co., 215 So.2d 673 (La.App. 1 Cir. 1968); Hamilton v. Lumbermen's Mutual Cas.

11978–1978

Where else courts name it

CA 49 (1994–2026) TX 24 (1993–2021) OH 14 (1985–2023) AL 13 (1988–2010) FL 12 (1975–2021) MI 12 (1980–2026) GA 10 (1980–2019) PA 8 (1990–2018) WV 8 (1984–2025) CT 7 (1995–2024) LA 6 (1978–2008) WA 6 (1980–2005) MN 6 (1996–2025) WI 6 (1998–2023) IN 6 (1990–2004) CO 5 (1996–2025) IA 5 (2004–2023) NJ 4 (1994–2018) AR 4 (1979–2026) MA 4 (1997–2002) RI 3 (1996–2009) SC 3 (1993–1999) IL 3 (1986–2023) MS 3 (2005–2023) NY 3 (1973–1991) KS 3 (2004–2026) NC 2 (1991–2013) ME 2 (2013–2023) OR 2 (1989–1995) SD 2 (2003–2022) DC 2 (2002–2003) OK 2 (1987–1989) NH 2 (2002–2018) MT 2 (1982–1997) AK 2 (2018–2018)

Opinions by the citing court's state. A doctrine retained in one state and abandoned in another shows up here as a year span that stalls.

← Caselaw search · G Cite Topics · Brief Check