Already have an account? Sign in instead.
You stay signed in for 30 days on this browser.
Continue with Google Continue with MicrosoftNo account yet? Create a free one.
We sent a six-digit code.
It expires in ten minutes, works once, and only in this browser. Five wrong tries void it. Send another code.
Your account is live and the Cloudflare checks are off for this browser.
12 Florida opinions name it 2 courts 1975–2021 1 in the last five years
The cases below were cited by Florida courts in a sentence that names this issue. Sides come from how each citing opinion treated the case (Syfertize flag on that citation), so a case can appear on both: that is where the law is contested. A red or yellow chip is the case's own overall treatment.
| Case | Followed | Cited |
|---|---|---|
Cantrell v. Forest City Publishing Co.green2 sentences1976See Cantrell v. Forest City Publishing Company, 419 U.S. 245 , 95 S.Ct. 465 , 42 L.Ed.2d 419 (1974). 1976See Cantrell v. Forest City Publishing Company, 419 U.S. 245 , 95 S.Ct. 465 , 42 L.Ed.2d 419 (1974). | 2 | 2 |
Cason v. Baskingreen2 sentences2012In Cason , the supreme court reversed a judgment entered in favor of the defendants on an invasion of privacy claim. 1 Id. at 244, 254 . 2012The court ruled that a “vivid and intimate character sketch” published without the consent of the plaintiff was sufficient for a prima facie claim of invasion of privacy and “would authorize the recovery of at least nominal damages.” Id. at 247 . | 1 | 2 |
Astillero Regnicoli, S.A.I.C.A. v. Northgreen1 sentence2021As to the invasion of privacy claim, we therefore reverse and remand for the trial court to determine whether the jurisdictional facts support specific jurisdiction under Florida’s long-arm statute, and, if so, “whether there are ‘minimum contacts’ which satisfy due process.” See Astillero Regnicoli, S.A.I.C.A. v. North, 677 So. 2d 26, 27 (Fla. 4th DCA 1996). ii. | 1 | 1 |
Wendt v. Horowitzgreen2 sentences2021See Wendt, 822 So. 2d at 1260 ; Stonepeak, 231 So. 3d at 555 (“Because there was no allegation or evidence that [the tortfeasor’s] alleged disclosure of information occurred in Florida or was directed at a person in Florida, the alleged disclosure of information . . . [did] not support [a] finding that [the appellant] committed a tortious act in Florida.” (emphasis added)); Deloitte & Touche v. Gencor Indus., Inc., 929 So. 2d 678, 683 (Fla. 5th DCA 2006) (finding personal jurisdiction where non-resident accounting firm allegedly sent false reports to Florida that it knew would be relied upon i 2021See Wendt, 822 So. 2d at 1260 ; Stonepeak, 231 So. 3d at 555; cf. Metnick, 123 So. 3d at 645–46 (concluding that alleged acts giving rise to claim of tortious interference arose in New York, where lawyer allegedly convinced a New York resident to breach a contract, although the contract was breached in Florida and loss of income was to a Florida firm). | 1 | 1 |
Deloitte & Touche v. GENCOR INDUSTRIESgreen1 sentence2021See Wendt, 822 So. 2d at 1260 ; Stonepeak, 231 So. 3d at 555 (“Because there was no allegation or evidence that [the tortfeasor’s] alleged disclosure of information occurred in Florida or was directed at a person in Florida, the alleged disclosure of information . . . [did] not support [a] finding that [the appellant] committed a tortious act in Florida.” (emphasis added)); Deloitte & Touche v. Gencor Indus., Inc., 929 So. 2d 678, 683 (Fla. 5th DCA 2006) (finding personal jurisdiction where non-resident accounting firm allegedly sent false reports to Florida that it knew would be relied upon i | 1 | 1 |
Ace Rent-A-Car, Inc. v. Empire Fire & Marine Insurancegreen2 sentences2010Co., 580 F.Supp.2d 678, 688 (N.D.Ill.2008) (relying on American States and Indiana law to find that “TCPA violations implicate a different privacy interest than that covered by the advertising injury provisions of the policy”); Auto-Owners Ins. 2010Co., 580 F.Supp.2d 678, 688 (N.D.Ill.2008) (relying on American States and Indiana law to find that "TCPA violations implicate a different privacy interest than that covered by the advertising injury provisions of the policy"); Auto-Owners Ins. | 1 | 1 |
Snyder v. Werneckegreen1 sentence2005"As a general rule, a statute of limitations begins to run when there has been notice of an invasion of legal rights or a person has been put on notice of his right to a cause of action," Snyder v. Wernecke, 813 So.2d 213, 216 (Fla. 4th DCA 2002). | 1 | 1 |
Rogers v. Loews L'Enfant Plaza Hotelgreen1 sentence2003See, e.g., Rogers v. Loews L'Enfant Plaza Hotel, 526 F.Supp. 523, 528 (D.D.C. 1981) (finding that the plaintiff stated a claim for invasion of privacy by alleging that her supervisor had repeatedly called her at home and at work in order to make lewd comments about her sex life). | 1 | 1 |
Vernon v. Medical Management Associates of Margate, Inc.green1 sentence2003On the other hand, in Vernon v. Medical Management Associates of Margate, Inc., 912 F.Supp. 1549, 1561 (S.D.Fla.1996), the district court held that the plaintiff's invasion of privacy claim, alleging "a pattern of persistent touching, squeezing, fondling, hugging, blowing and tickling, along with the repetition of lewd and vulgar sexual remarks" should have survived a motion to dismiss. | 1 | 1 |
Hennagan v. DEPT. OF HIGHWAY SAFETYgreen1 sentence2003Safety & Motor Vehicles, 467 So.2d 748, 750-51 (Fla. 1st Dist.Ct.App.1985) (reversing the trial court's dismissal of an invasion of privacy claim based on an "unlawful touching" by a police officer who sexually assaulted a minor after stopping her on the pretext that she was under suspicion for theft). | 1 | 1 |
Kelley v. Worleygreen1 sentence2003See also Kelley v. Worley, 29 F.Supp.2d 1304, 1311 (M.D.Ala.1998) (holding that the plaintiff's invasion of privacy claim, alleging that defendant committed sexually harassing acts of physical contact at work, should have survived the defendant's summary judgment motion). | 1 | 1 |
Lineberry v. State Farm Fire & Casualty Co.green1 sentence1997Co., 885 F.Supp. 1095, 1099 (M.D.Tenn.1995) (finding a personal umbrella liability policy similar to Purrelli's to be ambiguous and finding coverage for an invasion of privacy claim). | 1 | 1 |
| Case | Negative | Cited |
|---|---|---|
| No negative-treatment citations attached to this issue in Florida. Read the followed side critically anyway. | ||
| Case | Cited | Years |
|---|---|---|
MESSENGER BY MESSENGER v. Gruner+ Jahr USA Pub.
green
2 sentences2018Corp. , 831 So.2d 204 , 208 (Fla. 4th DCA 2002) ("The rule is designed to prevent plaintiffs from circumventing a valid defense to defamation by recasting essentially the same facts into several causes of action all meant to compensate for the same harm." (quoting Messenger v. Gruner + Jahr USA Publ'g , 994 F.Supp. 525 , 531 (S.D.N.Y. 1998), vacated on other grounds , 208 F.3d 122 (2000) ) ); Byrd v. Hustler Magazine, Inc. , 433 So.2d 593 , 595 (Fla. 4th DCA 1983) (rejecting an invasion of privacy claim because it was based on "the same factual allegations and legal argument" *49 as the defama 2018Corp. , 831 So.2d 204 , 208 (Fla. 4th DCA 2002) ("The rule is designed to prevent plaintiffs from circumventing a valid defense to defamation by recasting essentially the same facts into several causes of action all meant to compensate for the same harm." (quoting Messenger v. Gruner + Jahr USA Publ'g , 994 F.Supp. 525 , 531 (S.D.N.Y. 1998), vacated on other grounds , 208 F.3d 122 (2000) ) ); Byrd v. Hustler Magazine, Inc. , 433 So.2d 593 , 595 (Fla. 4th DCA 1983) (rejecting an invasion of privacy claim because it was based on "the same factual allegations and legal argument" *49 as the defama | 2 | 2018–2018 |
Callaway Land & Cattle Co., Inc. v. Banyon Lakes C. Corp.
green
2 sentences2018Corp. , 831 So.2d 204 , 208 (Fla. 4th DCA 2002) ("The rule is designed to prevent plaintiffs from circumventing a valid defense to defamation by recasting essentially the same facts into several causes of action all meant to compensate for the same harm." (quoting Messenger v. Gruner + Jahr USA Publ'g , 994 F.Supp. 525 , 531 (S.D.N.Y. 1998), vacated on other grounds , 208 F.3d 122 (2000) ) ); Byrd v. Hustler Magazine, Inc. , 433 So.2d 593 , 595 (Fla. 4th DCA 1983) (rejecting an invasion of privacy claim because it was based on "the same factual allegations and legal argument" *49 as the defama 2018Corp. , 831 So.2d 204 , 208 (Fla. 4th DCA 2002) ("The rule is designed to prevent plaintiffs from circumventing a valid defense to defamation by recasting essentially the same facts into several causes of action all meant to compensate for the same harm." (quoting Messenger v. Gruner + Jahr USA Publ'g , 994 F.Supp. 525 , 531 (S.D.N.Y. 1998), vacated on other grounds , 208 F.3d 122 (2000) ) ); Byrd v. Hustler Magazine, Inc. , 433 So.2d 593 , 595 (Fla. 4th DCA 1983) (rejecting an invasion of privacy claim because it was based on "the same factual allegations and legal argument" *49 as the defama | 2 | 2018–2018 |
Byrd v. Hustler Magazine, Inc.
green
2 sentences2018Corp. , 831 So.2d 204 , 208 (Fla. 4th DCA 2002) ("The rule is designed to prevent plaintiffs from circumventing a valid defense to defamation by recasting essentially the same facts into several causes of action all meant to compensate for the same harm." (quoting Messenger v. Gruner + Jahr USA Publ'g , 994 F.Supp. 525 , 531 (S.D.N.Y. 1998), vacated on other grounds , 208 F.3d 122 (2000) ) ); Byrd v. Hustler Magazine, Inc. , 433 So.2d 593 , 595 (Fla. 4th DCA 1983) (rejecting an invasion of privacy claim because it was based on "the same factual allegations and legal argument" *49 as the defama 2018Corp. , 831 So.2d 204 , 208 (Fla. 4th DCA 2002) ("The rule is designed to prevent plaintiffs from circumventing a valid defense to defamation by recasting essentially the same facts into several causes of action all meant to compensate for the same harm." (quoting Messenger v. Gruner + Jahr USA Publ'g , 994 F.Supp. 525 , 531 (S.D.N.Y. 1998), vacated on other grounds , 208 F.3d 122 (2000) ) ); Byrd v. Hustler Magazine, Inc. , 433 So.2d 593 , 595 (Fla. 4th DCA 1983) (rejecting an invasion of privacy claim because it was based on "the same factual allegations and legal argument" *49 as the defama | 2 | 2018–2018 |
Messenger v. Gruner + Jahr Printing & Publishing
green
2 sentences2018Corp. , 831 So.2d 204 , 208 (Fla. 4th DCA 2002) ("The rule is designed to prevent plaintiffs from circumventing a valid defense to defamation by recasting essentially the same facts into several causes of action all meant to compensate for the same harm." (quoting Messenger v. Gruner + Jahr USA Publ'g , 994 F.Supp. 525 , 531 (S.D.N.Y. 1998), vacated on other grounds , 208 F.3d 122 (2000) ) ); Byrd v. Hustler Magazine, Inc. , 433 So.2d 593 , 595 (Fla. 4th DCA 1983) (rejecting an invasion of privacy claim because it was based on "the same factual allegations and legal argument" *49 as the defama 2018Corp. , 831 So.2d 204 , 208 (Fla. 4th DCA 2002) ("The rule is designed to prevent plaintiffs from circumventing a valid defense to defamation by recasting essentially the same facts into several causes of action all meant to compensate for the same harm." (quoting Messenger v. Gruner + Jahr USA Publ'g , 994 F.Supp. 525 , 531 (S.D.N.Y. 1998), vacated on other grounds , 208 F.3d 122 (2000) ) ); Byrd v. Hustler Magazine, Inc. , 433 So.2d 593 , 595 (Fla. 4th DCA 1983) (rejecting an invasion of privacy claim because it was based on "the same factual allegations and legal argument" *49 as the defama | 2 | 2018–2018 |
Metnick & Levy, P.A. v. Seuling
green
1 sentence2021See Wendt, 822 So. 2d at 1260 ; Stonepeak, 231 So. 3d at 555; cf. Metnick, 123 So. 3d at 645–46 (concluding that alleged acts giving rise to claim of tortious interference arose in New York, where lawyer allegedly convinced a New York resident to breach a contract, although the contract was breached in Florida and loss of income was to a Florida firm). | 1 | 2021–2021 |
Stockett v. Tolin
green
1 sentence2003In Vernon , the district court explained that an increasing number of courts have recognized that allegations of offensive and undesired touchings of a sexual nature state a cause of action for invasion of privacy: In Stockett , for example, this Court held that "the repeated and offensive touching of the most private parts of Plaintiff's body ... constitutes an intrusion into [the plaintiff's] physical solicitude" amounting to invasion of privacy under Florida law. 791 F.Supp. at 1556 . | 1 | 2003–2003 |
Freeman v. Kulicke & Soffa Industries, Inc.
green
1 sentence1983In Freeman , the court required the moving party to point to deposition testimony to corroborate its claims where the motion for disqualification was made after discovery and near the trial. 449 F. Supp. at 978 . | 1 | 1983–1983 |
Opinions by the citing court's state. A doctrine retained in one state and abandoned in another shows up here as a year span that stalls.