Already have an account? Sign in instead.
You stay signed in for 30 days on this browser.
Continue with Google Continue with MicrosoftNo account yet? Create a free one.
We sent a six-digit code.
It expires in ten minutes, works once, and only in this browser. Five wrong tries void it. Send another code.
Your account is live and the Cloudflare checks are off for this browser.
6 Louisiana opinions name it 2 courts 1970–2000 0 in the last five years
The cases below were cited by Louisiana courts in a sentence that names this issue. Sides come from how each citing opinion treated the case (Syfertize flag on that citation), so a case can appear on both: that is where the law is contested. A red or yellow chip is the case's own overall treatment.
| Case | Followed | Cited |
|---|---|---|
State v. Babingreen1 sentence1984State v. Babin, 319 So.2d 367, 375 (La.1975), Tate, J., concurring. | 1 | 1 |
| Case | Negative | Cited |
|---|---|---|
| No negative-treatment citations attached to this issue in Louisiana. Read the followed side critically anyway. | ||
| Case | Cited | Years |
|---|---|---|
McDuffie v. Walker
green
2 sentences1979That mortgage is therefore rescinded, insofar as the Kings and their property are concerned, for the following reasons: With respect to the $85,000 mortgage the question is whether the bank should be treated as a third party for purposes of the public records doctrine; that is, should the bank be allowed to rely upon the public records showing Gill to be the owner of the property when the $85,000 mortgage was executed in their favor. *263 The bank relies upon Sections 2721 and 2722 of Title 9 of the Revised Statutes and the public record doctrine espoused by McDuffie v. Walker, 125 La. 152 , 5 1979That mortgage is therefore rescinded, insofar as the Kings and their property are concerned, for the following reasons: With respect to the $85,000 mortgage the question is whether the bank should be treated as a third party for purposes of the public records doctrine; that is, should the bank be allowed to rely upon the public records showing Gill to be the owner of the property when the $85,000 mortgage was executed in their favor. *263 The bank relies upon Sections 2721 and 2722 of Title 9 of the Revised Statutes and the public record doctrine espoused by McDuffie v. Walker, 125 La. 152 , 5 | 3 | 1970–1979 |
State v. Lee
green
1 sentence2000With regards to the admissibility of the arrest registers, in State v. Lee, (La.App. 2 Cir.1991), 577 So.2d 1193, 1196 , the Second Circuit Court of Appeal held that an original fingerprint card was admissible in a defendant's trial under the public record exception to the hearsay rule in La. | 1 | 2000–2000 |
Cormier v. PUBLIC RECORDS REQUEST OF GIULIO
green
1 sentence1993Cormier v. Public Records Request of DiGiulio, 553 So.2d 806 (La.1989). | 1 | 1993–1993 |
Blevins v. Manufacturers Record Publishing Co.
green
2 sentences1970Blevins v. Manufacturers Record *211 Publishing Co., 235 La. 708 , 105 So.2d 392, 414 ; McDuffie v. Walker, 125 La. 152 , 51 So. 100 . 1970Blevins v. Manufacturers Record *211 Publishing Co., 235 La. 708 , 105 So.2d 392, 414 ; McDuffie v. Walker, 125 La. 152 , 51 So. 100 . | 1 | 1970–1970 |
Opinions by the citing court's state. A doctrine retained in one state and abandoned in another shows up here as a year span that stalls.