Already have an account? Sign in instead.
You stay signed in for 30 days on this browser.
Continue with Google Continue with MicrosoftNo account yet? Create a free one.
We sent a six-digit code.
It expires in ten minutes, works once, and only in this browser. Five wrong tries void it. Send another code.
Your account is live and the Cloudflare checks are off for this browser.
8 Texas opinions name it 2 courts 1990–2017 0 in the last five years
The cases below were cited by Texas courts in a sentence that names this issue. Sides come from how each citing opinion treated the case (Syfertize flag on that citation), so a case can appear on both: that is where the law is contested. A red or yellow chip is the case's own overall treatment.
| Case | Followed | Cited |
|---|---|---|
Cole v. Stategreen2 sentences2006See id. at 804-05 ; Tex. R. 1998App. 1994) (record insufficient to determine whether chemists and toxicologists of Bexar County Forensic Science Center are law enforcement personnel and thus excluded from the public record exception to the hearsay rule); Cole v. State , 839 S.W.2d 798 (Tex Crim. | 1 | 2 |
Garcia v. Stategreen1 sentence2017See id. | 1 | 1 |
Beavers v. Northrop Worldwide Aircraft Services, Inc.green1 sentence2014See id. at R. 803(8). | 1 | 1 |
Speier v. Webster Collegegreen1 sentence2012See Speier, 616 S.W.2d at 619 ; Lawrence, 2009 WL 1886177 , at *5; see also Corrales, 155 S.W.3d at 486 . | 1 | 1 |
Corrales v. Department of Family & Protective Servicesgreen1 sentence2012See Speier, 616 S.W.2d at 619 ; Lawrence, 2009 WL 1886177 , at *5; see also Corrales, 155 S.W.3d at 486 . | 1 | 1 |
Woods v. Stategreen1 sentence2001The administrative law judge overruled these objections. 3 State, 956 S.W.2d 33, 38 (Tex. Crim. | 1 | 1 |
Texas Department of Public Safety v. Mendozagreen1 sentence1998See Mendoza, 956 S.W.2d at 811 . | 1 | 1 |
| Case | Negative | Cited |
|---|---|---|
| No negative-treatment citations attached to this issue in Texas. Read the followed side critically anyway. | ||
| Case | Cited | Years |
|---|---|---|
Porter v. State
green
1 sentence1990In Porter v. State, 578 S.W.2d 742 (Tex.Cr.App.1979) we held: Clearly, the recordation pursuant to law of official acts, events, or matters relating to the operations of a federal parole office or to particular parolees, about which there can be no reasonable dispute, is done in the performance of the functions of a government officer’s official duties. | 1 | 1990–1990 |
Opinions by the citing court's state. A doctrine retained in one state and abandoned in another shows up here as a year span that stalls.