Already have an account? Sign in instead.
You stay signed in for 30 days on this browser.
Continue with Google Continue with MicrosoftNo account yet? Create a free one.
We sent a six-digit code.
It expires in ten minutes, works once, and only in this browser. Five wrong tries void it. Send another code.
Your account is live and the Cloudflare checks are off for this browser.
6 Louisiana opinions name it 2 courts 1950–2006 0 in the last five years
The cases below were cited by Louisiana courts in a sentence that names this issue. Sides come from how each citing opinion treated the case (Syfertize flag on that citation), so a case can appear on both: that is where the law is contested. A red or yellow chip is the case's own overall treatment.
| Case | Followed | Cited |
|---|---|---|
Roy v. United Gas Corporationgreen1 sentence1995See the well-reasoned discussion of this rule in Roy v. United Gas Corporation, 163 So.2d 587, 592-93 (La.App. 3d Cir.1964), writ denied. | 1 | 1 |
Dept. of Highways v. Caponegreen1 sentence1975See, Department of Highways v. Capone, 248 So.2d 62 (La.App. 1st Cir. 1971). | 1 | 1 |
| Case | Negative | Cited |
|---|---|---|
| No negative-treatment citations attached to this issue in Louisiana. Read the followed side critically anyway. | ||
| Case | Cited | Years |
|---|---|---|
Belle Pass Terminal, Inc. v. Jolin, Inc.
green
1 sentence2006Id. *1162 In the instant case, the trial court handed down well-considered reasons for judgment in holding that the right-of-way privilege enjoyed by Entergy across LL & E's property (for almost twenty years at the time of plaintiff's alleged injury) was not solely limited to the plat attached to the Agreement. | 1 | 2006–2006 |
State Farm Mut. Auto. Ins. Co. v. Niagara Fire Ins. Co.
green
1 sentence1978The right of way rule declared in Subsection A is modified at through highways and otherwise as hereinafter stated in this part." [2] Combel v. Webster, 315 So.2d 338 (La.App. 4th Cir. 1975); Zito v. Kuhn, 309 So.2d 806 (La.App. 4th Cir. 1975); Becken v. Stonewell Insurance Co., 275 So.2d 470 (La.App. 2nd Cir. 1973); State Farm Mutual Automobile Insurance Company v. Niagara Fire Insurance Co., 183 So.2d 145 (La.App. 1st Cir. 1966, writs refused); Lambright v. Aetna Casualty & Surety Company, 258 So.2d 100 (La.App. 2nd Cir. 1972, writs denied). | 1 | 1978–1978 |
Becken v. Stonewall Insurance Company
neutral
1 sentence1978The right of way rule declared in Subsection A is modified at through highways and otherwise as hereinafter stated in this part." [2] Combel v. Webster, 315 So.2d 338 (La.App. 4th Cir. 1975); Zito v. Kuhn, 309 So.2d 806 (La.App. 4th Cir. 1975); Becken v. Stonewell Insurance Co., 275 So.2d 470 (La.App. 2nd Cir. 1973); State Farm Mutual Automobile Insurance Company v. Niagara Fire Insurance Co., 183 So.2d 145 (La.App. 1st Cir. 1966, writs refused); Lambright v. Aetna Casualty & Surety Company, 258 So.2d 100 (La.App. 2nd Cir. 1972, writs denied). | 1 | 1978–1978 |
Zito v. Kuhn
neutral
1 sentence1978The right of way rule declared in Subsection A is modified at through highways and otherwise as hereinafter stated in this part." [2] Combel v. Webster, 315 So.2d 338 (La.App. 4th Cir. 1975); Zito v. Kuhn, 309 So.2d 806 (La.App. 4th Cir. 1975); Becken v. Stonewell Insurance Co., 275 So.2d 470 (La.App. 2nd Cir. 1973); State Farm Mutual Automobile Insurance Company v. Niagara Fire Insurance Co., 183 So.2d 145 (La.App. 1st Cir. 1966, writs refused); Lambright v. Aetna Casualty & Surety Company, 258 So.2d 100 (La.App. 2nd Cir. 1972, writs denied). | 1 | 1978–1978 |
Lambright v. Aetna Casualty & Surety Co.
neutral
1 sentence1978The right of way rule declared in Subsection A is modified at through highways and otherwise as hereinafter stated in this part." [2] Combel v. Webster, 315 So.2d 338 (La.App. 4th Cir. 1975); Zito v. Kuhn, 309 So.2d 806 (La.App. 4th Cir. 1975); Becken v. Stonewell Insurance Co., 275 So.2d 470 (La.App. 2nd Cir. 1973); State Farm Mutual Automobile Insurance Company v. Niagara Fire Insurance Co., 183 So.2d 145 (La.App. 1st Cir. 1966, writs refused); Lambright v. Aetna Casualty & Surety Company, 258 So.2d 100 (La.App. 2nd Cir. 1972, writs denied). | 1 | 1978–1978 |
Combel v. Webster
neutral
1 sentence1978The right of way rule declared in Subsection A is modified at through highways and otherwise as hereinafter stated in this part." [2] Combel v. Webster, 315 So.2d 338 (La.App. 4th Cir. 1975); Zito v. Kuhn, 309 So.2d 806 (La.App. 4th Cir. 1975); Becken v. Stonewell Insurance Co., 275 So.2d 470 (La.App. 2nd Cir. 1973); State Farm Mutual Automobile Insurance Company v. Niagara Fire Insurance Co., 183 So.2d 145 (La.App. 1st Cir. 1966, writs refused); Lambright v. Aetna Casualty & Surety Company, 258 So.2d 100 (La.App. 2nd Cir. 1972, writs denied). | 1 | 1978–1978 |
Neal v. Davenport
neutral
1 sentence1976Neal v. Davenport, 270 So.2d 617 (La.App. 2d Cir. 1972). | 1 | 1976–1976 |
Lindsay v. Shreveport Laundries, Inc.
neutral
1 sentence1950Blashfield’s Cyclopedia of Automobile Law and Practice, Section 686; Lindsay v. Shreveport Laundries, La.App., 43 So.2d 921 ; Greenwood v. Romby, La.App., — So.2d -- 1 Careful study of plaintiff’s petition in the instant case discloses that the words negligence, proximate cause, contributing cause, contributory negligence are nowhere used and in order to 'hold the petition sufficient it is necessary to read certain implications and certain conclusions into the document. | 1 | 1950–1950 |
Opinions by the citing court's state. A doctrine retained in one state and abandoned in another shows up here as a year span that stalls.