Already have an account? Sign in instead.
You stay signed in for 30 days on this browser.
Continue with Google Continue with MicrosoftNo account yet? Create a free one.
We sent a six-digit code.
It expires in ten minutes, works once, and only in this browser. Five wrong tries void it. Send another code.
Your account is live and the Cloudflare checks are off for this browser.
6 Louisiana opinions name it 2 courts 1943–1989 0 in the last five years
The cases below were cited by Louisiana courts in a sentence that names this issue. Sides come from how each citing opinion treated the case (Syfertize flag on that citation), so a case can appear on both: that is where the law is contested. A red or yellow chip is the case's own overall treatment.
| Case | Followed | Cited |
|---|---|---|
State v. Mylesgreen1 sentence1980See State v. Williams, 384 So.2d 779 (La.1980). [6] For a thorough discussion of the factors employed to evaluate the competence of counsel, see Justice Dennis' thoughtful and scholarly decision in State v. Myles, 389 So.2d 12 (La. 1980). [7] In State v. Jones, 381 So.2d 416 (La.1980) we held that compliance with the guidelines statute was not required in cases in which the sentence imposed was not "apparently severe". [8] Clearly, the sentence agreed upon by the parties is not binding upon the judge, who must consider the overall interests of society and the individual defendant in deciding w | 1 | 1 |
State v. Jonesgreen1 sentence1980See State v. Williams, 384 So.2d 779 (La.1980). [6] For a thorough discussion of the factors employed to evaluate the competence of counsel, see Justice Dennis' thoughtful and scholarly decision in State v. Myles, 389 So.2d 12 (La. 1980). [7] In State v. Jones, 381 So.2d 416 (La.1980) we held that compliance with the guidelines statute was not required in cases in which the sentence imposed was not "apparently severe". [8] Clearly, the sentence agreed upon by the parties is not binding upon the judge, who must consider the overall interests of society and the individual defendant in deciding w | 1 | 1 |
State v. Williamsgreen1 sentence1980See State v. Williams, 384 So.2d 779 (La.1980). [6] For a thorough discussion of the factors employed to evaluate the competence of counsel, see Justice Dennis' thoughtful and scholarly decision in State v. Myles, 389 So.2d 12 (La. 1980). [7] In State v. Jones, 381 So.2d 416 (La.1980) we held that compliance with the guidelines statute was not required in cases in which the sentence imposed was not "apparently severe". [8] Clearly, the sentence agreed upon by the parties is not binding upon the judge, who must consider the overall interests of society and the individual defendant in deciding w | 1 | 1 |
| Case | Negative | Cited |
|---|---|---|
| No negative-treatment citations attached to this issue in Louisiana. Read the followed side critically anyway. | ||
| Case | Cited | Years |
|---|---|---|
Corsey v. State, Through Dept. of Corrections
green
2 sentences1989For a thorough discussion of the doctrine of contra non valentem, see Corsey v. State, Department of Corrections, 375 So.2d 1319 (La.1979). 1988William A. Culpepper, Judge, Retired, participated in this decision by appointment of the Louisiana Supreme Court as Judge Pro Tempore. [1] For a thorough discussion of the doctrine of contra non valentem, see Corsey v. State, Department of Corrections, 375 So.2d 1319 (La. 1978). | 2 | 1988–1989 |
Olivier v. National Union Fire Ins. Co. of Pittsburgh
green
2 sentences1989For a discussion of the doctrine specifically applied to an action for legal malpractice, see Olivier v. National Union Fire Insurance Company Of Pittsburgh, PA, 499 So.2d 1330 (La.App. 3rd Cir.1986) and Blanchard v. Reeves, 469 So.2d 1165 (La.App. 5th Cir.1985), writ denied, 476 So.2d 347 (La.1985). 1988For a discussion of the doctrine specifically applied to legal malpractice, see Olivier, 499 So.2d at 1136 ; Blanchard v. Reeves, 469 So.2d 1165 (La.App.5th Cir), writ denied, 476 So.2d 347 (La.1985) | 2 | 1988–1989 |
Blanchard v. Reeves
neutral
2 sentences1989For a discussion of the doctrine specifically applied to an action for legal malpractice, see Olivier v. National Union Fire Insurance Company Of Pittsburgh, PA, 499 So.2d 1330 (La.App. 3rd Cir.1986) and Blanchard v. Reeves, 469 So.2d 1165 (La.App. 5th Cir.1985), writ denied, 476 So.2d 347 (La.1985). 1988For a discussion of the doctrine specifically applied to legal malpractice, see Olivier, 499 So.2d at 1136 ; Blanchard v. Reeves, 469 So.2d 1165 (La.App.5th Cir), writ denied, 476 So.2d 347 (La.1985) | 2 | 1988–1989 |
Blanchard v. Reeves
green
2 sentences1989For a discussion of the doctrine specifically applied to an action for legal malpractice, see Olivier v. National Union Fire Insurance Company Of Pittsburgh, PA, 499 So.2d 1330 (La.App. 3rd Cir.1986) and Blanchard v. Reeves, 469 So.2d 1165 (La.App. 5th Cir.1985), writ denied, 476 So.2d 347 (La.1985). 1988For a discussion of the doctrine specifically applied to legal malpractice, see Olivier, 499 So.2d at 1136 ; Blanchard v. Reeves, 469 So.2d 1165 (La.App.5th Cir), writ denied, 476 So.2d 347 (La.1985) | 2 | 1988–1989 |
State v. Broadnax
green
2 sentences1952For a thorough discussion of the rule regarding the phraseology and the spelling of words in verdicts rendered by a jury in a criminal case, see State v. Broadnax, 216 La. 1003 , 45 So.2d 604 . 1952For a thorough discussion of the rule regarding the phraseology and the spelling of words in verdicts rendered by a jury in a criminal case, see State v. Broadnax, 216 La. 1003 , 45 So.2d 604 . | 2 | 1952–1952 |
Fontenot v. Freudenstein
green
1 sentence1943Co., La.App., 192 So. 774 , and the doctrine is also discussed by our brethren of the First Circuit in the case of Young v. Thompson, La.App., 189 So. 487 , and of the Orleans Court in Fontenot v. Freudenstein et al., La.App., 199 So. 677 . | 1 | 1943–1943 |
Young v. Thompson
neutral
1 sentence1943Co., La.App., 192 So. 774 , and the doctrine is also discussed by our brethren of the First Circuit in the case of Young v. Thompson, La.App., 189 So. 487 , and of the Orleans Court in Fontenot v. Freudenstein et al., La.App., 199 So. 677 . | 1 | 1943–1943 |
Eggleston v. Louisiana & A. Ry. Co.
green
1 sentence1943Co., La.App., 192 So. 774 , and the doctrine is also discussed by our brethren of the First Circuit in the case of Young v. Thompson, La.App., 189 So. 487 , and of the Orleans Court in Fontenot v. Freudenstein et al., La.App., 199 So. 677 . | 1 | 1943–1943 |
Opinions by the citing court's state. A doctrine retained in one state and abandoned in another shows up here as a year span that stalls.