Already have an account? Sign in instead.
You stay signed in for 30 days on this browser.
Continue with Google Continue with MicrosoftNo account yet? Create a free one.
We sent a six-digit code.
It expires in ten minutes, works once, and only in this browser. Five wrong tries void it. Send another code.
Your account is live and the Cloudflare checks are off for this browser.
6 Massachusetts opinions name it 2 courts 2004–2023 1 in the last five years
The cases below were cited by Massachusetts courts in a sentence that names this issue. Sides come from how each citing opinion treated the case (Syfertize flag on that citation), so a case can appear on both: that is where the law is contested. A red or yellow chip is the case's own overall treatment.
| Case | Followed | Cited |
|---|---|---|
Lyons v. Duncangreen2 sentences2023“The rule prohibits the long- barred practice of claim-splitting.” Lyons v. Duncan, 81 Mass. App. Ct. 766, 771 (2012), quoting M.J. 2018The rule prohibits the long-barred practice of claim-splitting." Lyons v. Duncan , 81 Mass. App. Ct. 766 , 770-771 (2012), quoting from M.J. | 2 | 4 |
Keen v. Western New England Collegegreen1 sentence2004Keen v. Western New England College, 23 Mass. App. Ct. 84, 87 (1986). | 1 | 1 |
| Case | Negative | Cited |
|---|---|---|
| No negative-treatment citations attached to this issue in Massachusetts. Read the followed side critically anyway. | ||
| Case | Cited | Years |
|---|---|---|
M.J. Flaherty Co. v. United States Fidelity & Guaranty Co.
green
1 sentence2013This rule attempts to enforce “the long-barred practice of claim splitting.” Id. | 1 | 2013–2013 |