Already have an account? Sign in instead.
You stay signed in for 30 days on this browser.
Continue with Google Continue with MicrosoftNo account yet? Create a free one.
We sent a six-digit code.
It expires in ten minutes, works once, and only in this browser. Five wrong tries void it. Send another code.
Your account is live and the Cloudflare checks are off for this browser.
6 Maryland opinions name it 2 courts 1990–2015 0 in the last five years
The cases below were cited by Maryland courts in a sentence that names this issue. Sides come from how each citing opinion treated the case (Syfertize flag on that citation), so a case can appear on both: that is where the law is contested. A red or yellow chip is the case's own overall treatment.
| Case | Followed | Cited |
|---|---|---|
Meyer v. Vancegreen1 sentence1990See, e.g., Graham v. Sisco, 248 Ark. 6 , 449 S.W.2d 949, 950 (1970); Meyer v. Vance, 406 P.2d 996, 999 (Okla.1965); Buck v. Mueller, 221 Or. 271 , 351 P.2d 61, 64 (1960); Strunk v. Bennett, 258 S.W.2d 517, 518-19 (Ky.1953); Leslie v. Brown Bros. | 1 | 1 |
Buck v. Muellergreen2 sentences1990See, e.g., Graham v. Sisco, 248 Ark. 6 , 449 S.W.2d 949, 950 (1970); Meyer v. Vance, 406 P.2d 996, 999 (Okla.1965); Buck v. Mueller, 221 Or. 271 , 351 P.2d 61, 64 (1960); Strunk v. Bennett, 258 S.W.2d 517, 518-19 (Ky.1953); Leslie v. Brown Bros. 1990See, e.g., Graham v. Sisco, 248 Ark. 6 , 449 S.W.2d 949, 950 (1970); Meyer v. Vance, 406 P.2d 996, 999 (Okla.1965); Buck v. Mueller, 221 Or. 271 , 351 P.2d 61, 64 (1960); Strunk v. Bennett, 258 S.W.2d 517, 518-19 (Ky.1953); Leslie v. Brown Bros. | 1 | 1 |
Graham v. Siscogreen2 sentences1990See, e.g., Graham v. Sisco, 248 Ark. 6 , 449 S.W.2d 949, 950 (1970); Meyer v. Vance, 406 P.2d 996, 999 (Okla.1965); Buck v. Mueller, 221 Or. 271 , 351 P.2d 61, 64 (1960); Strunk v. Bennett, 258 S.W.2d 517, 518-19 (Ky.1953); Leslie v. Brown Bros. 1990See, e.g., Graham v. Sisco, 248 Ark. 6 , 449 S.W.2d 949, 950 (1970); Meyer v. Vance, 406 P.2d 996, 999 (Okla.1965); Buck v. Mueller, 221 Or. 271 , 351 P.2d 61, 64 (1960); Strunk v. Bennett, 258 S.W.2d 517, 518-19 (Ky.1953); Leslie v. Brown Bros. | 1 | 1 |
Strunk v. Bennettgreen1 sentence1990See, e.g., Graham v. Sisco, 248 Ark. 6 , 449 S.W.2d 949, 950 (1970); Meyer v. Vance, 406 P.2d 996, 999 (Okla.1965); Buck v. Mueller, 221 Or. 271 , 351 P.2d 61, 64 (1960); Strunk v. Bennett, 258 S.W.2d 517, 518-19 (Ky.1953); Leslie v. Brown Bros. | 1 | 1 |
| Case | Negative | Cited |
|---|---|---|
| No negative-treatment citations attached to this issue in Maryland. Read the followed side critically anyway. | ||
| Case | Cited | Years |
|---|---|---|
Rowland v. Harrison
green
2 sentences2012Respondents retort that a defendant may not bring a separate and subsequent action based on a prior counterclaim that could have been raised if “[t]he relationship between the counterclaim and the plaintiffs claim is such that successful prosecution of the second action would nullify the initial judgment or would impair rights established in the initial action.” Rowland, 320 Md. at 232 , 577 A.2d at 55 (quoting Restatement (Second) of Judgments § 22(2)(b) (1982)). 2012Respondents retort that a defendant may not bring a separate and subsequent action based on a prior counterclaim that could have been raised if “[t]he relationship between the counterclaim and the plaintiffs claim is such that successful prosecution of the second action would nullify the initial judgment or would impair rights established in the initial action.” Rowland, 320 Md. at 232 , 577 A.2d at 55 (quoting Restatement (Second) of Judgments § 22(2)(b) (1982)). | 5 | 2002–2015 |
Opinions by the citing court's state. A doctrine retained in one state and abandoned in another shows up here as a year span that stalls.