Already have an account? Sign in instead.
You stay signed in for 30 days on this browser.
Continue with Google Continue with MicrosoftNo account yet? Create a free one.
We sent a six-digit code.
It expires in ten minutes, works once, and only in this browser. Five wrong tries void it. Send another code.
Your account is live and the Cloudflare checks are off for this browser.
6 Maryland opinions name it 2 courts 1995–2017 0 in the last five years
The cases below were cited by Maryland courts in a sentence that names this issue. Sides come from how each citing opinion treated the case (Syfertize flag on that citation), so a case can appear on both: that is where the law is contested. A red or yellow chip is the case's own overall treatment.
| Case | Followed | Cited |
|---|---|---|
Calder v. Bullgreen2 sentences2017The Doe dissent would have applied a different test, derived from Collins v. Youngblood, 497 U.S. 37, 49-50 , 110 S.Ct. 2715 , 111 L.Ed.2d 30 (1990) (overruling Kring), and Calder v. Bull, 3 U.S. (3 Dall.) 386 , 390, 1 L.Ed. 648 (1798): The Ex Post Facto Clause prohibits “[e]very law that changes the punishment, and inflicts a greater punishment, than the law annexed to the crime, when committed.” Doe, 430 Md. at 582 , 62 A.3d 123 (Barbera, J., dissenting) (emphasis added) (quoting Calder, 3 U.S. (3 Dall.) at 390 ). 19 Under that alternative test, Grandison’s claim would still fail, as it is c 2017The Doe dissent would have applied a different test, derived from Collins v. Youngblood, 497 U.S. 37, 49-50 , 110 S.Ct. 2715 , 111 L.Ed.2d 30 (1990) (overruling Kring), and Calder v. Bull, 3 U.S. (3 Dall.) 386 , 390, 1 L.Ed. 648 (1798): The Ex Post Facto Clause prohibits “[e]very law that changes the punishment, and inflicts a greater punishment, than the law annexed to the crime, when committed.” Doe, 430 Md. at 582 , 62 A.3d 123 (Barbera, J., dissenting) (emphasis added) (quoting Calder, 3 U.S. (3 Dall.) at 390 ). 19 Under that alternative test, Grandison’s claim would still fail, as it is c | 1 | 2 |
Doe v. Department of Public Safety & Correctional Servicesgreen2 sentences2017The Doe dissent would have applied a different test, derived from Collins v. Youngblood, 497 U.S. 37, 49-50 , 110 S.Ct. 2715 , 111 L.Ed.2d 30 (1990) (overruling Kring), and Calder v. Bull, 3 U.S. (3 Dall.) 386 , 390, 1 L.Ed. 648 (1798): The Ex Post Facto Clause prohibits “[e]very law that changes the punishment, and inflicts a greater punishment, than the law annexed to the crime, when committed.” Doe, 430 Md. at 582 , 62 A.3d 123 (Barbera, J., dissenting) (emphasis added) (quoting Calder, 3 U.S. (3 Dall.) at 390 ). 19 Under that alternative test, Grandison’s claim would still fail, as it is c 2017The Doe dissent would have applied a different test, derived from Collins v. Youngblood, 497 U.S. 37, 49-50 , 110 S.Ct. 2715 , 111 L.Ed.2d 30 (1990) (overruling Kring), and Calder v. Bull, 3 U.S. (3 Dall.) 386 , 390, 1 L.Ed. 648 (1798): The Ex Post Facto Clause prohibits “[e]very law that changes the punishment, and inflicts a greater punishment, than the law annexed to the crime, when committed.” Doe, 430 Md. at 582 , 62 A.3d 123 (Barbera, J., dissenting) (emphasis added) (quoting Calder, 3 U.S. (3 Dall.) at 390 ). 19 Under that alternative test, Grandison’s claim would still fail, as it is c | 1 | 2 |
Collins v. Youngbloodgreen2 sentences2017The Doe dissent would have applied a different test, derived from Collins v. Youngblood, 497 U.S. 37, 49-50 , 110 S.Ct. 2715 , 111 L.Ed.2d 30 (1990) (overruling Kring), and Calder v. Bull, 3 U.S. (3 Dall.) 386 , 390, 1 L.Ed. 648 (1798): The Ex Post Facto Clause prohibits “[e]very law that changes the punishment, and inflicts a greater punishment, than the law annexed to the crime, when committed.” Doe, 430 Md. at 582 , 62 A.3d 123 (Barbera, J., dissenting) (emphasis added) (quoting Calder, 3 U.S. (3 Dall.) at 390 ). 19 Under that alternative test, Grandison’s claim would still fail, as it is c 2017The Doe dissent would have applied a different test, derived from Collins v. Youngblood, 497 U.S. 37, 49-50 , 110 S.Ct. 2715 , 111 L.Ed.2d 30 (1990) (overruling Kring), and Calder v. Bull, 3 U.S. (3 Dall.) 386 , 390, 1 L.Ed. 648 (1798): The Ex Post Facto Clause prohibits “[e]very law that changes the punishment, and inflicts a greater punishment, than the law annexed to the crime, when committed.” Doe, 430 Md. at 582 , 62 A.3d 123 (Barbera, J., dissenting) (emphasis added) (quoting Calder, 3 U.S. (3 Dall.) at 390 ). 19 Under that alternative test, Grandison’s claim would still fail, as it is c | 1 | 2 |
Grandison v. Stategreen2 sentences2012See Grandison II, 305 Md. at 767 , 506 A.2d at 621 (“We have thoroughly reviewed the record and are satisfied that there was sufficient evidence to have allowed the jury to find an agreement between Grandison and Evans to have Scott and Cheryl Piechowicz killed so they would not be available as witnesses against Grandison in his federal drug trial.”); Grandison V, 390 Md. at 436 , 889 A.2d at 380 (“The evidence presented by the prosecution at Grandison’s 1983 trial, including that of Evans’s guilt and Grandison’s role as mastermind is overwhelming and supports our confidence in the result of G 1995Grandison II, 305 Md. at 759 , 506 A.2d at 617 . | 1 | 2 |
Grandison v. Stategreen1 sentence2012See Grandison II, 305 Md. at 767 , 506 A.2d at 621 (“We have thoroughly reviewed the record and are satisfied that there was sufficient evidence to have allowed the jury to find an agreement between Grandison and Evans to have Scott and Cheryl Piechowicz killed so they would not be available as witnesses against Grandison in his federal drug trial.”); Grandison V, 390 Md. at 436 , 889 A.2d at 380 (“The evidence presented by the prosecution at Grandison’s 1983 trial, including that of Evans’s guilt and Grandison’s role as mastermind is overwhelming and supports our confidence in the result of G | 1 | 1 |
Grandison v. Stategreen2 sentences2012See Grandison IV, 351 Md. at 732, 720 A.2d at 322 (1998). 2012See Grandison IV, 351 Md. at 732, 720 A.2d at 322 (1998). | 1 | 1 |
Thomas v. Stategreen2 sentences1995Grandison’s objection to the composition of the jury was waived because he declared the jury ultimately impanelled acceptable without qualification. 22 See Thomas v. State, 301 Md. 294, 310 , 483 A.2d 6, 14 (1985) and cases cited therein. 1995Grandison’s objection to the composition of the jury was waived because he declared the jury ultimately impanelled acceptable without qualification. 22 See Thomas v. State, 301 Md. 294, 310 , 483 A.2d 6, 14 (1985) and cases cited therein. | 1 | 1 |
| Case | Negative | Cited |
|---|---|---|
| No negative-treatment citations attached to this issue in Maryland. Read the followed side critically anyway. | ||
| Case | Cited | Years |
|---|---|---|
Evans v. State
green
2 sentences2012Question Seven: Legal Status of the Death Penalty in Maryland In his Motion to Correct an Illegal Sentence, under Maryland Rule 4-345, Grandison argued that this Court’s ruling in Evans v. State, 396 Md. 256 , 914 A.2d 25 (2006), “establishes that the implementation of a death sentence as a penalty for first degree murder is not [a] possibility!.]” As stated in his brief before this Court, Grandison also avers that “it would violate constitutional prohibitions against ‘ex post facto laws’ for any warrant of execution to be issued, in the future!.]” The Circuit Court denied Grandison’s motion o 2012Question Seven: Legal Status of the Death Penalty in Maryland In his Motion to Correct an Illegal Sentence, under Maryland Rule 4-345, Grandison argued that this Court’s ruling in Evans v. State, 396 Md. 256 , 914 A.2d 25 (2006), “establishes that the implementation of a death sentence as a penalty for first degree murder is not [a] possibility!.]” As stated in his brief before this Court, Grandison also avers that “it would violate constitutional prohibitions against ‘ex post facto laws’ for any warrant of execution to be issued, in the future!.]” The Circuit Court denied Grandison’s motion o | 1 | 2012–2012 |
United States v. Anthony Grandison, United States of America v. Vernon Evans, Jr., United States of America v. Rodney Kelly
green
2 sentences2006United States v. Grandison, 885 F.2d 143 (4th Cir.1989). 2006United States v. Grandison, 885 F.2d 143 (4th Cir.1989). | 1 | 2006–2006 |
Schriro v. Summerlin
green
2 sentences2005Despite the Supreme Court’s holding in Schriro v. Summerlin, 542 U.S. 348 , 124 S.Ct. 2519 , 159 L.Ed.2d 442 (2004), that Ring is not to be applied retroactively, we need not address that issue, because even if Ring were applicable, Grandison would not be entitled to relief. 7 . 2005Despite the Supreme Court’s holding in Schriro v. Summerlin, 542 U.S. 348 , 124 S.Ct. 2519 , 159 L.Ed.2d 442 (2004), that Ring is not to be applied retroactively, we need not address that issue, because even if Ring were applicable, Grandison would not be entitled to relief. 7 . | 1 | 2005–2005 |
Myers v. State
green
2 sentences1995In the only case of this nature where the State sought the death penalty, Myers v. State 58 Md.App. 211 , 472 A.2d 1027 , cert. denied, 300 Md. 484 , 479 A.2d 373 (1984), Myers was given a life sentence. 1995In the only case of this nature where the State sought the death penalty, Myers v. State 58 Md.App. 211 , 472 A.2d 1027 , cert. denied, 300 Md. 484 , 479 A.2d 373 (1984), Myers was given a life sentence. | 1 | 1995–1995 |
Mills v. Maryland
green
2 sentences1995XXIX Grandison argues that, as his prior death sentences were vacated on post conviction pursuant to Mills v. Maryland, 486 U.S. 367 , 108 S.Ct. 1860 , 100 L.Ed.2d 384 (1988), it violated double jeopardy principles to resentence him using the revised sentence determination form. 1995XXIX Grandison argues that, as his prior death sentences were vacated on post conviction pursuant to Mills v. Maryland, 486 U.S. 367 , 108 S.Ct. 1860 , 100 L.Ed.2d 384 (1988), it violated double jeopardy principles to resentence him using the revised sentence determination form. | 1 | 1995–1995 |
Counted by distinct opinions that both name this issue and are annotated to the section; sections every opinion cites regardless of issue are not filtered here, so read the counts against the total above.