Already have an account? Sign in instead.
You stay signed in for 30 days on this browser.
Continue with Google Continue with MicrosoftNo account yet? Create a free one.
We sent a six-digit code.
It expires in ten minutes, works once, and only in this browser. Five wrong tries void it. Send another code.
Your account is live and the Cloudflare checks are off for this browser.
6 Maryland opinions name it 1 courts 1926–1985 0 in the last five years
The cases below were cited by Maryland courts in a sentence that names this issue. Sides come from how each citing opinion treated the case (Syfertize flag on that citation), so a case can appear on both: that is where the law is contested. A red or yellow chip is the case's own overall treatment.
| Case | Followed | Cited |
|---|---|---|
| No positive-treatment citations attached to this issue in Maryland. | ||
| Case | Negative | Cited |
|---|---|---|
| No negative-treatment citations attached to this issue in Maryland. Read the followed side critically anyway. | ||
| Case | Cited | Years |
|---|---|---|
Taxicab Co. v. Ottenritter
green
2 sentences1961On p. 6 it was said: “The limited effect thus given to the right of way rule has not escaped criticism. * * * Nevertheless, although a more stringent rule, comparable to the ‘stop, look and listen’ rule, has been applied in cases where traffic is controlled by lights (Sun Cab v. Paulkner, 163 Md. 477 , 163 A. 194 ; Gudelsky v. Boone, 180 Md. 265 , 23 A. 2d 694 ) or by stop signs (Carlin v. Worthington, 172 Md. 505 , 192 A. 356 ; Shedlock v. Marshall, 186 Md. 218 , 46 A. 2d 349 ; Belle Isle Cab Co. v. Pruitt, 187 Md. 174 , 49 A. 2d 537 ), the rule announced in the Ottenritter case [ 151 Md. 525 1949The language is the same as that contained in section 209 of art. 56 of the Code of 1924, construed by this court in Taxicab Co. v. Ottenritter, 151 Md. 525, 531 , 135 A. 587, 589 . | 2 | 1949–1961 |
Wlodkowski v. Yerkaitis
green
2 sentences1951It was said by this Court in the case of Wlodkowski v. Yerkaitis, 190 Md. 128 , 57 A. 2d 792 , 794: “* * * the statutory right of way rule is regarded as a cautionary guide, rather than a peremptory command. 1951It was said by this Court in the case of Wlodkowski v. Yerkaitis, 190 Md. 128 , 57 A. 2d 792 , 794: “* * * the statutory right of way rule is regarded as a cautionary guide, rather than a peremptory command. | 2 | 1949–1951 |
Askin v. Long
green
1 sentence1985Askin v. Long, 176 Md. 545 , would appear, on first consideration, to be but another of the Ottenritter type. | 1 | 1985–1985 |
Carlin v. Worthington
green
2 sentences1961On p. 6 it was said: “The limited effect thus given to the right of way rule has not escaped criticism. * * * Nevertheless, although a more stringent rule, comparable to the ‘stop, look and listen’ rule, has been applied in cases where traffic is controlled by lights (Sun Cab v. Paulkner, 163 Md. 477 , 163 A. 194 ; Gudelsky v. Boone, 180 Md. 265 , 23 A. 2d 694 ) or by stop signs (Carlin v. Worthington, 172 Md. 505 , 192 A. 356 ; Shedlock v. Marshall, 186 Md. 218 , 46 A. 2d 349 ; Belle Isle Cab Co. v. Pruitt, 187 Md. 174 , 49 A. 2d 537 ), the rule announced in the Ottenritter case [ 151 Md. 525 1961On p. 6 it was said: “The limited effect thus given to the right of way rule has not escaped criticism. * * * Nevertheless, although a more stringent rule, comparable to the ‘stop, look and listen’ rule, has been applied in cases where traffic is controlled by lights (Sun Cab v. Paulkner, 163 Md. 477 , 163 A. 194 ; Gudelsky v. Boone, 180 Md. 265 , 23 A. 2d 694 ) or by stop signs (Carlin v. Worthington, 172 Md. 505 , 192 A. 356 ; Shedlock v. Marshall, 186 Md. 218 , 46 A. 2d 349 ; Belle Isle Cab Co. v. Pruitt, 187 Md. 174 , 49 A. 2d 537 ), the rule announced in the Ottenritter case [ 151 Md. 525 | 1 | 1961–1961 |
Belle Isle Cab Co. v. Pruitt
green
2 sentences1961On p. 6 it was said: “The limited effect thus given to the right of way rule has not escaped criticism. * * * Nevertheless, although a more stringent rule, comparable to the ‘stop, look and listen’ rule, has been applied in cases where traffic is controlled by lights (Sun Cab v. Paulkner, 163 Md. 477 , 163 A. 194 ; Gudelsky v. Boone, 180 Md. 265 , 23 A. 2d 694 ) or by stop signs (Carlin v. Worthington, 172 Md. 505 , 192 A. 356 ; Shedlock v. Marshall, 186 Md. 218 , 46 A. 2d 349 ; Belle Isle Cab Co. v. Pruitt, 187 Md. 174 , 49 A. 2d 537 ), the rule announced in the Ottenritter case [ 151 Md. 525 1961On p. 6 it was said: “The limited effect thus given to the right of way rule has not escaped criticism. * * * Nevertheless, although a more stringent rule, comparable to the ‘stop, look and listen’ rule, has been applied in cases where traffic is controlled by lights (Sun Cab v. Paulkner, 163 Md. 477 , 163 A. 194 ; Gudelsky v. Boone, 180 Md. 265 , 23 A. 2d 694 ) or by stop signs (Carlin v. Worthington, 172 Md. 505 , 192 A. 356 ; Shedlock v. Marshall, 186 Md. 218 , 46 A. 2d 349 ; Belle Isle Cab Co. v. Pruitt, 187 Md. 174 , 49 A. 2d 537 ), the rule announced in the Ottenritter case [ 151 Md. 525 | 1 | 1961–1961 |
Shedlock v. Marshall
green
2 sentences1961On p. 6 it was said: “The limited effect thus given to the right of way rule has not escaped criticism. * * * Nevertheless, although a more stringent rule, comparable to the ‘stop, look and listen’ rule, has been applied in cases where traffic is controlled by lights (Sun Cab v. Paulkner, 163 Md. 477 , 163 A. 194 ; Gudelsky v. Boone, 180 Md. 265 , 23 A. 2d 694 ) or by stop signs (Carlin v. Worthington, 172 Md. 505 , 192 A. 356 ; Shedlock v. Marshall, 186 Md. 218 , 46 A. 2d 349 ; Belle Isle Cab Co. v. Pruitt, 187 Md. 174 , 49 A. 2d 537 ), the rule announced in the Ottenritter case [ 151 Md. 525 1961On p. 6 it was said: “The limited effect thus given to the right of way rule has not escaped criticism. * * * Nevertheless, although a more stringent rule, comparable to the ‘stop, look and listen’ rule, has been applied in cases where traffic is controlled by lights (Sun Cab v. Paulkner, 163 Md. 477 , 163 A. 194 ; Gudelsky v. Boone, 180 Md. 265 , 23 A. 2d 694 ) or by stop signs (Carlin v. Worthington, 172 Md. 505 , 192 A. 356 ; Shedlock v. Marshall, 186 Md. 218 , 46 A. 2d 349 ; Belle Isle Cab Co. v. Pruitt, 187 Md. 174 , 49 A. 2d 537 ), the rule announced in the Ottenritter case [ 151 Md. 525 | 1 | 1961–1961 |
Sun Cab Co. v. Faulkner
green
2 sentences1961On p. 6 it was said: “The limited effect thus given to the right of way rule has not escaped criticism. * * * Nevertheless, although a more stringent rule, comparable to the ‘stop, look and listen’ rule, has been applied in cases where traffic is controlled by lights (Sun Cab v. Paulkner, 163 Md. 477 , 163 A. 194 ; Gudelsky v. Boone, 180 Md. 265 , 23 A. 2d 694 ) or by stop signs (Carlin v. Worthington, 172 Md. 505 , 192 A. 356 ; Shedlock v. Marshall, 186 Md. 218 , 46 A. 2d 349 ; Belle Isle Cab Co. v. Pruitt, 187 Md. 174 , 49 A. 2d 537 ), the rule announced in the Ottenritter case [ 151 Md. 525 1961On p. 6 it was said: “The limited effect thus given to the right of way rule has not escaped criticism. * * * Nevertheless, although a more stringent rule, comparable to the ‘stop, look and listen’ rule, has been applied in cases where traffic is controlled by lights (Sun Cab v. Paulkner, 163 Md. 477 , 163 A. 194 ; Gudelsky v. Boone, 180 Md. 265 , 23 A. 2d 694 ) or by stop signs (Carlin v. Worthington, 172 Md. 505 , 192 A. 356 ; Shedlock v. Marshall, 186 Md. 218 , 46 A. 2d 349 ; Belle Isle Cab Co. v. Pruitt, 187 Md. 174 , 49 A. 2d 537 ), the rule announced in the Ottenritter case [ 151 Md. 525 | 1 | 1961–1961 |
Gudelsky v. Boone
green
2 sentences1961On p. 6 it was said: “The limited effect thus given to the right of way rule has not escaped criticism. * * * Nevertheless, although a more stringent rule, comparable to the ‘stop, look and listen’ rule, has been applied in cases where traffic is controlled by lights (Sun Cab v. Paulkner, 163 Md. 477 , 163 A. 194 ; Gudelsky v. Boone, 180 Md. 265 , 23 A. 2d 694 ) or by stop signs (Carlin v. Worthington, 172 Md. 505 , 192 A. 356 ; Shedlock v. Marshall, 186 Md. 218 , 46 A. 2d 349 ; Belle Isle Cab Co. v. Pruitt, 187 Md. 174 , 49 A. 2d 537 ), the rule announced in the Ottenritter case [ 151 Md. 525 1961On p. 6 it was said: “The limited effect thus given to the right of way rule has not escaped criticism. * * * Nevertheless, although a more stringent rule, comparable to the ‘stop, look and listen’ rule, has been applied in cases where traffic is controlled by lights (Sun Cab v. Paulkner, 163 Md. 477 , 163 A. 194 ; Gudelsky v. Boone, 180 Md. 265 , 23 A. 2d 694 ) or by stop signs (Carlin v. Worthington, 172 Md. 505 , 192 A. 356 ; Shedlock v. Marshall, 186 Md. 218 , 46 A. 2d 349 ; Belle Isle Cab Co. v. Pruitt, 187 Md. 174 , 49 A. 2d 537 ), the rule announced in the Ottenritter case [ 151 Md. 525 | 1 | 1961–1961 |
Buckey v. White
neutral
2 sentences1931Buckey v. White, 137 Md. 124 , 111 A. 777 . 1931Buckey v. White, 137 Md. 124 , 111 A. 777 . | 1 | 1931–1931 |
Consolidated Gas Electric Light & Power Co. v. Rudiger
green
1 sentence1926As in the case of Consolidated Gas Co. v. Rudiger, 151 Md. 226 , the conditions in reference to which the statutory right of way rule may be properly declared in an instruction to the jury have not been shown to exist. | 1 | 1926–1926 |
Opinions by the citing court's state. A doctrine retained in one state and abandoned in another shows up here as a year span that stalls.