Already have an account? Sign in instead.
You stay signed in for 30 days on this browser.
Continue with Google Continue with MicrosoftNo account yet? Create a free one.
We sent a six-digit code.
It expires in ten minutes, works once, and only in this browser. Five wrong tries void it. Send another code.
Your account is live and the Cloudflare checks are off for this browser.
6 Maine opinions name it 2 courts 2009–2022 1 in the last five years
The cases below were cited by Maine courts in a sentence that names this issue. Sides come from how each citing opinion treated the case (Syfertize flag on that citation), so a case can appear on both: that is where the law is contested. A red or yellow chip is the case's own overall treatment.
| Case | Followed | Cited |
|---|---|---|
Wood v. Superintendent of Insurancegreen2 sentences2011The court "will not 'second-guess the agency on matters falling within its realm of expertise."' Mulready, 2009 ME 135 , <JI 13, 984 A.2d 1285 (quoting Wood v. Superintendent of Ins., 638 A.2d 67, 71 (Me. 1994)). 2009We will not “second-guess the agency on matters falling within its realm of expertise.” Wood v. Superintendent of Ins., 638 A.2d 67, 71 (Me.1994). | 2 | 2 |
Beauchene v. Department of Health & Human Servicesgreen2 sentences2013The Court must also give "considerable deference to the agency's interpretation of its own rules, regulations, c.nd procedures, and will not set aside the agency's findings unless the rule or 3 regulation pla:nly compels a c<Jntrary result." Bea:1chene, 2009 ?vfE 24, ~ 11, 965 A.2d 866 (internal citation orr:itted). 2011"Considerable deference is given 'to the agency's interpretation of its own rules, regulations, and procedures, and [we] will not set aside the agency's findings unless the rule or regulation plainly compels a contrary result."' Mulready v. Bd. of Real Estate Appraisers, 2009 ME 135 , <JI 13, 984 A.2d 1285 (quoting Beauchene v. Dep't of Health & Human Servs., 2009 ME 24 , <JI 11, 965 A.2d 866 (quotation marks omitted)). | 1 | 5 |
Seider v. Board of Examiners of Psychologistsgreen2 sentences2009Considerable deference is given “to the agency’s interpretation of its own rules, regulations, and procedures, and [we] will not set aside the agency’s findings unless the rule or regulation plainly compels a contrary result.” Beauchene, 2009 ME 24, ¶ 11 , 965 A.2d at 870 (quotation marks omitted); see also Seider, 2000 ME 206, ¶ 32 , 762 A.2d at 561 . 2009Considerable deference is given “to the agency’s interpretation of its own rules, regulations, and procedures, and [we] will not set aside the agency’s findings unless the rule or regulation plainly compels a contrary result.” Beauchene, 2009 ME 24, ¶ 11 , 965 A.2d at 870 (quotation marks omitted); see also Seider, 2000 ME 206, ¶ 32 , 762 A.2d at 561 . | 1 | 1 |
| Case | Negative | Cited |
|---|---|---|
| No negative-treatment citations attached to this issue in Maine. Read the followed side critically anyway. | ||
| Case | Cited | Years |
|---|---|---|
Mulready v. BOARD OF REAL ESTATE APPRAISERS
green
2 sentences2014(Stipulations 'l['l[ 2-3; R. at Tab 12.) 2 court] will not set aside the agency's findings unless the rule or regulation plainly compels a contrary result." Mulready v. Bd. of Real Estate Appraisers, 2009 ME 135 , ~ 13, 984 A.2d 1285 (quotation marks omitted). 2. 2014(Stipulations 'l['l[ 2-3; R. at Tab 12.) 2 court] will not set aside the agency's findings unless the rule or regulation plainly compels a contrary result." Mulready v. Bd. of Real Estate Appraisers, 2009 ME 135 , ~ 13, 984 A.2d 1285 (quotation marks omitted). 2. | 2 | 2011–2014 |
Suzman v. Commissioner, Department of Health & Human Services
green
1 sentence2013The Cour1 2.lso ack.nowiedges that when it acts in an appellate capaci·cy, as it does here, it may not "rm.ke facrua~ findings independePt of those made by the agency. " Suzman v. Comm 'r, Dep 'r of Health & Human Sen.'s., 2005 ::ME 80, fi 24, 876 A.2d 29 . | 1 | 2013–2013 |