Already have an account? Sign in instead.
You stay signed in for 30 days on this browser.
Continue with Google Continue with MicrosoftNo account yet? Create a free one.
We sent a six-digit code.
It expires in ten minutes, works once, and only in this browser. Five wrong tries void it. Send another code.
Your account is live and the Cloudflare checks are off for this browser.
6 Michigan opinions name it 2 courts 1986–2022 1 in the last five years
The cases below were cited by Michigan courts in a sentence that names this issue. Sides come from how each citing opinion treated the case (Syfertize flag on that citation), so a case can appear on both: that is where the law is contested. A red or yellow chip is the case's own overall treatment.
| Case | Followed | Cited |
|---|---|---|
Negri v. Slotkingreen2 sentences1987See Negri v Slotkin, 397 Mich 105 ; 244 NW2d 98 (1976). [15] SJI2d 53.03. [16] MCL 600.6306; MSA 27A.6306, added by 1986 PA 178 . [17] 1986 PA 178 , § 3(3). [18] Kovacs, supra, pp 649-650 . [19] Id., p 649. [20] Id., p 650. [21] MCL 600.6303, 600.6306; MSA 27A.6303, 27A.6306, added by 1986 PA 178 . [22] Kovacs, supra, p 650 . [23] (f) "Governmental function" is an activity which is expressly or impliedly mandated or authorized by constitution, statute, local charter or ordinance, or other law. [MCL 691.1401(f); MSA 3.996(101)(f).] (4) This act does not grant immunity to a governmental agency w 1987See Negri v Slotkin, 397 Mich 105 ; 244 NW2d 98 (1976). [15] SJI2d 53.03. [16] MCL 600.6306; MSA 27A.6306, added by 1986 PA 178 . [17] 1986 PA 178 , § 3(3). [18] Kovacs, supra, pp 649-650 . [19] Id., p 649. [20] Id., p 650. [21] MCL 600.6303, 600.6306; MSA 27A.6303, 27A.6306, added by 1986 PA 178 . [22] Kovacs, supra, p 650 . [23] (f) "Governmental function" is an activity which is expressly or impliedly mandated or authorized by constitution, statute, local charter or ordinance, or other law. [MCL 691.1401(f); MSA 3.996(101)(f).] (4) This act does not grant immunity to a governmental agency w | 1 | 1 |
Scudder v. Annapolis Hospitalgreen2 sentences1986See n 4. [18] But see Scudder v Annapolis Hospital, 129 Mich App 280 ; 341 NW2d 504 (1983). [1] MCL 691.1407(4); MSA 3.996(107)(4) provides: This act does not grant immunity to a governmental agency with respect to the ownership or operation of a hospital or county medical care facility or to the agents or employees of such hospital or county medical care facility. 1986See n 4. [18] But see Scudder v Annapolis Hospital, 129 Mich App 280 ; 341 NW2d 504 (1983). [1] MCL 691.1407(4); MSA 3.996(107)(4) provides: This act does not grant immunity to a governmental agency with respect to the ownership or operation of a hospital or county medical care facility or to the agents or employees of such hospital or county medical care facility. | 1 | 1 |
| Case | Negative | Cited |
|---|---|---|
| No negative-treatment citations attached to this issue in Michigan. Read the followed side critically anyway. | ||
| Case | Cited | Years |
|---|---|---|
MacK v. City of Detroit
red
2 sentences2022Plaintiff seeks to avoid governmental immunity by using the governmental-hospital exception, which provides, in relevant part, “This act does not grant immunity to a governmental agency or an employee or agent of a governmental agency with respect to providing medical care or treatment -4- to a patient . . . .” MCL 691.1407(4). “[I]t is the responsibility of the party seeking to impose liability on a governmental agency to demonstrate that its case falls within one of the exceptions.” Mack v Detroit, 467 Mich 186, 201 ; 649 NW2d 47 (2002). 2022Plaintiff seeks to avoid governmental immunity by using the governmental-hospital exception, which provides, in relevant part, “This act does not grant immunity to a governmental agency or an employee or agent of a governmental agency with respect to providing medical care or treatment -4- to a patient . . . .” MCL 691.1407(4). “[I]t is the responsibility of the party seeking to impose liability on a governmental agency to demonstrate that its case falls within one of the exceptions.” Mack v Detroit, 467 Mich 186, 201 ; 649 NW2d 47 (2002). | 1 | 2022–2022 |
Briggs v. Oakland County
green
2 sentences2010The “medical care or treatment” exception to governmental immunity provides: This act does not grant immunity to a governmental agency or an employee or agent of a governmental agency with respect to providing medical care or treatment to a patient, except medical care or treatment provided to a patient in a hospital owned or operated by the department of community health or a hospital owned or operated by the department of corrections and except care or treatment provided by an uncompensated search and rescue operation medical assistant or tactical operation medical assistant. [MCL 691.1407(4 2010The “medical care or treatment” exception to governmental immunity provides: This act does not grant immunity to a governmental agency or an employee or agent of a governmental agency with respect to providing medical care or treatment to a patient, except medical care or treatment provided to a patient in a hospital owned or operated by the department of community health or a hospital owned or operated by the department of corrections and except care or treatment provided by an uncompensated search and rescue operation medical assistant or tactical operation medical assistant. [MCL 691.1407(4 | 1 | 2010–2010 |
Ross v. Consumers Power Co.
yellow
1 sentence1998However, as we observed in Ross, supra at 618-619 , 363 N.W.2d 641 , the Legislature's disparate treatment of public and private tortfeasors is not unjustifiable per se. [16] M.C.L. § 691.1407(4); M.S.A. § 3.996(107)(4) (emphasis added). [17] As long as the agent satisfies the requisite elements set forth in subsection 7(2). [18] We note that subsection 7(4) does not state the following: This act does not grant immunity to a governmental agency with respect to the ownership or operation of a hospital ... or to the agents or employees of such hospital [ only while working at such hospital]. [19 | 1 | 1998–1998 |
Caterpillar, Inc v. Department of Treasury
green
2 sentences1996Caterpillar, Inc v Dep’t of Treasury, 440 Mich 400, 413 ; 488 NW2d 182 (1992); Michigan Soft Drink Ass’n v Dep’t of Treasury, 206 Mich App 392, 401 ; 522 NW2d 643 (1994). 1996Caterpillar, Inc v Dep’t of Treasury, 440 Mich 400, 413 ; 488 NW2d 182 (1992); Michigan Soft Drink Ass’n v Dep’t of Treasury, 206 Mich App 392, 401 ; 522 NW2d 643 (1994). | 1 | 1996–1996 |
Michigan Soft Drink Ass'n v. Department of Treasury
green
2 sentences1996Caterpillar, Inc v Dep’t of Treasury, 440 Mich 400, 413 ; 488 NW2d 182 (1992); Michigan Soft Drink Ass’n v Dep’t of Treasury, 206 Mich App 392, 401 ; 522 NW2d 643 (1994). 1996Caterpillar, Inc v Dep’t of Treasury, 440 Mich 400, 413 ; 488 NW2d 182 (1992); Michigan Soft Drink Ass’n v Dep’t of Treasury, 206 Mich App 392, 401 ; 522 NW2d 643 (1994). | 1 | 1996–1996 |
Kovacs v. Chesapeake & Ohio Railway Co.
green
2 sentences1987Kovacs, supra, p 650 . (f) "Governmental function” is an activity which is expressly or impliedly mandated or authorized by constitution, statute, local charter or ordinance, or other law. [MCL 691.1401(0; MSA 3.996(101)(f).] (4) This act does not grant immunity to a governmental agency with respect to the ownership or operation of a hospital or county medical care facility or to the agents or employees of such hospital or county medical care facility. 1987See Negri v Slotkin, 397 Mich 105 ; 244 NW2d 98 (1976). [15] SJI2d 53.03. [16] MCL 600.6306; MSA 27A.6306, added by 1986 PA 178 . [17] 1986 PA 178 , § 3(3). [18] Kovacs, supra, pp 649-650 . [19] Id., p 649. [20] Id., p 650. [21] MCL 600.6303, 600.6306; MSA 27A.6303, 27A.6306, added by 1986 PA 178 . [22] Kovacs, supra, p 650 . [23] (f) "Governmental function" is an activity which is expressly or impliedly mandated or authorized by constitution, statute, local charter or ordinance, or other law. [MCL 691.1401(f); MSA 3.996(101)(f).] (4) This act does not grant immunity to a governmental agency w | 1 | 1987–1987 |
De Haan v. Winter
red
2 sentences1987See Negri v Slotkin, 397 Mich 105 ; 244 NW2d 98 (1976). [15] SJI2d 53.03. [16] MCL 600.6306; MSA 27A.6306, added by 1986 PA 178 . [17] 1986 PA 178 , § 3(3). [18] Kovacs, supra, pp 649-650 . [19] Id., p 649. [20] Id., p 650. [21] MCL 600.6303, 600.6306; MSA 27A.6303, 27A.6306, added by 1986 PA 178 . [22] Kovacs, supra, p 650 . [23] (f) "Governmental function" is an activity which is expressly or impliedly mandated or authorized by constitution, statute, local charter or ordinance, or other law. [MCL 691.1401(f); MSA 3.996(101)(f).] (4) This act does not grant immunity to a governmental agency w 1987See Negri v Slotkin, 397 Mich 105 ; 244 NW2d 98 (1976). [15] SJI2d 53.03. [16] MCL 600.6306; MSA 27A.6306, added by 1986 PA 178 . [17] 1986 PA 178 , § 3(3). [18] Kovacs, supra, pp 649-650 . [19] Id., p 649. [20] Id., p 650. [21] MCL 600.6303, 600.6306; MSA 27A.6303, 27A.6306, added by 1986 PA 178 . [22] Kovacs, supra, p 650 . [23] (f) "Governmental function" is an activity which is expressly or impliedly mandated or authorized by constitution, statute, local charter or ordinance, or other law. [MCL 691.1401(f); MSA 3.996(101)(f).] (4) This act does not grant immunity to a governmental agency w | 1 | 1987–1987 |
Counted by distinct opinions that both name this issue and are annotated to the section; sections every opinion cites regardless of issue are not filtered here, so read the counts against the total above.