application of a court rule (Michigan) · Go Syfert
← Michigan issues

application of a court rule in Michigan

6 Michigan opinions name it 1 courts 2014–2023 1 in the last five years

The cases below were cited by Michigan courts in a sentence that names this issue. Sides come from how each citing opinion treated the case (Syfertize flag on that citation), so a case can appear on both: that is where the law is contested. A red or yellow chip is the case's own overall treatment.

Followed or applied (1)

CaseFollowedCited
Keenan v. Dawsongreen
michctapp · 2007 · cited in 1 Michigan opinions naming this issue, 2014–2014
2 sentences

2014See Keenan v Dawson, 275 Mich App 671, 681 ; 739 NW2d 681 (2007).

2014See Keenan v Dawson, 275 Mich App 671, 681 ; 739 NW2d 681 (2007).

11

Distinguished, questioned or overruled (0)

CaseNegativeCited
No negative-treatment citations attached to this issue in Michigan. Read the followed side critically anyway.

Also cited on this issue (5)

CaseCitedYears
Kaeb v. Kaeb green
michctapp · 2015
2 sentences

2018Kaeb v Kaeb, 309 Mich App 556, 564 ; 873 NW2d 319 (2015).

2018Kaeb v Kaeb, 309 Mich App 556, 564 ; 873 NW2d 319 (2015).

22018–2018
Zaid Safdar v. Donya Aziz green
mich · 2018
2 sentences

2023Safdar v Aziz, 501 Mich 213, 217 ; 912 NW2d 511 (2018).

2023Safdar v Aziz, 501 Mich 213, 217 ; 912 NW2d 511 (2018).

12023–2023
People v. Cole green
mich · 2012
2 sentences

2019People v Cole, 491 Mich 325, 330 ; 817 NW2d 497 (2012).

2019People v Cole, 491 Mich 325, 330 ; 817 NW2d 497 (2012).

12019–2019
Robinson v. Department of Transportation neutral
michctapp · 1981
2 sentences

2014Defendants also relied on Robinson v Dep’t of Transp, 120 Mich App 656 ; 327 NW2d 317 (1981), in support of their claim that plaintiff cannot refile a class action to avoid the application of a court rule.

2014Defendants also relied on Robinson v Dep’t of Transp, 120 Mich App 656 ; 327 NW2d 317 (1981), in support of their claim that plaintiff cannot refile a class action to avoid the application of a court rule.

12014–2014
Cady v. City of Detroit green
mich · 1939
2 sentences

2014Every reasonable presumption or intendment must be indulged in favor of the validity of an act, and it is only when invalidity appears so clearly as to leave no room for reasonable doubt that it violates some provision of the Constitution that a court will refuse to sustain its validity. [Cady v Detroit, 289 Mich 499, 505 ; 286 NW 805 (1939).] When faced with a claim that the application of a court rule renders it unconstitutional, we must analyze the court rule “as applied” to the particular case.

2014Every reasonable presumption or intendment must be indulged in favor of the validity of an act, and it is only when invalidity appears so clearly as to leave no room for reasonable doubt that it violates some provision of the Constitution that a court will refuse to sustain its validity. [Cady v Detroit, 289 Mich 499, 505 ; 286 NW 805 (1939).] When faced with a claim that the application of a court rule renders it unconstitutional, we must analyze the court rule “as applied” to the particular case.

12014–2014

Statutes the citing opinions construe

MI § Mich. Comp. Laws § 600.2919a (3)

Counted by distinct opinions that both name this issue and are annotated to the section; sections every opinion cites regardless of issue are not filtered here, so read the counts against the total above.

Where else courts name it

WA 41 (1996–2026) MI 6 (2014–2023) NJ 2 (1996–2026)

Opinions by the citing court's state. A doctrine retained in one state and abandoned in another shows up here as a year span that stalls.

← Caselaw search · G Cite Topics · Brief Check