Already have an account? Sign in instead.
You stay signed in for 30 days on this browser.
Continue with Google Continue with MicrosoftNo account yet? Create a free one.
We sent a six-digit code.
It expires in ten minutes, works once, and only in this browser. Five wrong tries void it. Send another code.
Your account is live and the Cloudflare checks are off for this browser.
6 Michigan opinions name it 1 courts 1993–2014 0 in the last five years
The cases below were cited by Michigan courts in a sentence that names this issue. Sides come from how each citing opinion treated the case (Syfertize flag on that citation), so a case can appear on both: that is where the law is contested. A red or yellow chip is the case's own overall treatment.
| Case | Followed | Cited |
|---|---|---|
| No positive-treatment citations attached to this issue in Michigan. | ||
| Case | Negative | Cited |
|---|---|---|
| No negative-treatment citations attached to this issue in Michigan. Read the followed side critically anyway. | ||
| Case | Cited | Years |
|---|---|---|
Roper v. Simmons
green
2 sentences2014The Court characterized the rule it was adopting as a “categorical rule.” Id. at 572 .5 The subsequent decision in Graham adopted what the Court again characterized as a “categorical rule,” i.e., that a sentence of life without parole could not be imposed on a juvenile nonhomicide offender. 2014The Court characterized the rule it was adopting as a “categorical rule.” Id. at 572 .5 The subsequent decision in Graham adopted what the Court again characterized as a “categorical rule,” i.e., that a sentence of life without parole could not be imposed on a juvenile nonhomicide offender. | 3 | 2014–2014 |
Graham v. Florida
green
2 sentences2014Graham, 560 US at 79 . 2014Graham, 560 US at 79 . | 3 | 2014–2014 |
People v. Mitchell
green
1 sentence2002Saying that the record belied the claim that the decision not to call her was strategic, the Court characterized defense counsels’ preparation as “inadequate,” and concluded, “our confidence in the reliability of the result has been undermined, Mitchell, supra, and a new trial based on ineffective assistance is warranted.” The contrary conclusion of the circuit court was explained in the opinion it issued after the remand proceedings. | 1 | 2002–2002 |
Hill v. Nationwide Mutual Fire Insurance
green
2 sentences1995These decisions — Epps v Nicholson, 187 Ga App 246; 370 SE2d 13 (1988), Georgia Farm Bureau Mut Ins Co v Kephart, 211 Ga App 423; 439 SE2d 682 (1993), *189 and Hill v Nationwide Mut Fire Ins Co, 214 Ga App 715; 448 SE2d 747 (1994) — consider "where you reside," [35] the language in this case. 1995These deci sions — Epps v Nicholson, 187 Ga App 246; 370 SE2d 13 (1988), Georgia Farm Bureau Mut Ins Co v Kephart, 211 Ga App 423; 439 SE2d 682 (1993), and Hill v Nationwide Mut Fire Ins Co, 214 Ga App 715; 448 SE2d 747 (1994) — consider "where you reside,” 35 the language in this case. | 1 | 1995–1995 |
Epps v. Nicholson
green
2 sentences1995These decisions — Epps v Nicholson, 187 Ga App 246; 370 SE2d 13 (1988), Georgia Farm Bureau Mut Ins Co v Kephart, 211 Ga App 423; 439 SE2d 682 (1993), *189 and Hill v Nationwide Mut Fire Ins Co, 214 Ga App 715; 448 SE2d 747 (1994) — consider "where you reside," [35] the language in this case. 1995These deci sions — Epps v Nicholson, 187 Ga App 246; 370 SE2d 13 (1988), Georgia Farm Bureau Mut Ins Co v Kephart, 211 Ga App 423; 439 SE2d 682 (1993), and Hill v Nationwide Mut Fire Ins Co, 214 Ga App 715; 448 SE2d 747 (1994) — consider "where you reside,” 35 the language in this case. | 1 | 1995–1995 |
Georgia Farm Bureau Mutual Insurance v. Kephart
green
2 sentences1995These decisions — Epps v Nicholson, 187 Ga App 246; 370 SE2d 13 (1988), Georgia Farm Bureau Mut Ins Co v Kephart, 211 Ga App 423; 439 SE2d 682 (1993), *189 and Hill v Nationwide Mut Fire Ins Co, 214 Ga App 715; 448 SE2d 747 (1994) — consider "where you reside," [35] the language in this case. 1995These deci sions — Epps v Nicholson, 187 Ga App 246; 370 SE2d 13 (1988), Georgia Farm Bureau Mut Ins Co v Kephart, 211 Ga App 423; 439 SE2d 682 (1993), and Hill v Nationwide Mut Fire Ins Co, 214 Ga App 715; 448 SE2d 747 (1994) — consider "where you reside,” 35 the language in this case. | 1 | 1995–1995 |
Bowen v. Eli Lilly & Co.
green
2 sentences1993The majority's approach provides the plaintiff with the opportunity to bring suit while simultaneously recognizing the Legislature's desire, as announced in the statute of limitations. [29] In Bowen v Eli Lilly & Co, Inc, 408 Mass 204, 207; 557 NE2d 739 (1990), the Massachusetts Supreme Judicial Court addressed the "level of notice of causation a plaintiff must have to trigger the running of the statute of limitations." The court characterized the standard as a "likely standard," yet required a lesser quantum of information than "likely" to commence the running of the statute of limitations. 1993In Bowen v Eli Lilly & Co, Inc, 408 Mass 204, 207; 557 NE2d 739 (1990), the Massachusetts Supreme Judicial Court addressed the "level of notice of causation a plaintiff must have to trigger the running of the statute of limitations.” The court characterized the standard as a "likely standard,” yet required a lesser quantum of information than "likely” to commence the running of the statute of limitations. | 1 | 1993–1993 |
Counted by distinct opinions that both name this issue and are annotated to the section; sections every opinion cites regardless of issue are not filtered here, so read the counts against the total above.
Opinions by the citing court's state. A doctrine retained in one state and abandoned in another shows up here as a year span that stalls.