Already have an account? Sign in instead.
You stay signed in for 30 days on this browser.
Continue with Google Continue with MicrosoftNo account yet? Create a free one.
We sent a six-digit code.
It expires in ten minutes, works once, and only in this browser. Five wrong tries void it. Send another code.
Your account is live and the Cloudflare checks are off for this browser.
6 Florida opinions name it 2 courts 1993–2023 1 in the last five years
The cases below were cited by Florida courts in a sentence that names this issue. Sides come from how each citing opinion treated the case (Syfertize flag on that citation), so a case can appear on both: that is where the law is contested. A red or yellow chip is the case's own overall treatment.
| Case | Followed | Cited |
|---|---|---|
Pizza Hut of America, Inc. v. Millergreen1 sentence2003In a subsequent case, the court characterized the rule another way: that there is no jurisdiction to review such an order unless that order "conclusively and finally determines a party's nonentitlement to such immunity." Pizza Hut of America, Inc. v. Miller, 696 So.2d 340, 341 (Fla.1997). | 1 | 1 |
Transgulf Pipeline Co./dept. of Community Affairs v. Bd. of Cty. Comm'rsgreen1 sentence1993Thus, although section 380.07(2) provides for an "appeal" of a development order in any area of critical state concern or for any development of regional impact, this term must be interpreted in its "broadest, non-technical sense ... to mean merely an application to a higher authority." Transgulf Pipeline Co. v. Board of County Comm'rs, 438 So.2d 876, 878 (Fla. 1st DCA 1983) (interpreting word "appeals" in section 380.07(3)), review denied, 449 So.2d 264 (Fla. 1984). | 1 | 1 |
| Case | Negative | Cited |
|---|---|---|
| No negative-treatment citations attached to this issue in Florida. Read the followed side critically anyway. | ||
| Case | Cited | Years |
|---|---|---|
Owen v. State
green
1 sentence2023As a result, Owen asserted that the “record does not affirmatively demonstrate that [he] knowingly, intelligently and voluntarily waived his postconviction proceedings.” Id. | 1 | 2023–2023 |
cluster 785769
green
1 sentence2007Id. at 235 . | 1 | 2007–2007 |
Maynard v. Household Finance Corp. III
green
2 sentences2004The court considered that the counterclaim was essentially one for recoupment, stating: "A recoupment seeks to diminish or exceed the damages sought by the plaintiff." Id. at 1207 . 2004In Maynard v. Household Finance Corp. III, 861 So.2d 1204 (Fla. 2d DCA 2003), a mortgage foreclosure suit was answered by a counterclaim, which the court characterized as a claim for fraud in the inducement or for breach of contract. | 1 | 2004–2004 |
Gregersen v. State
green
1 sentence1999Similarly, in Gregersen v. State, 714 So.2d 1195 (Fla. 4th DCA), review granted, 728 So.2d 205 (Fla.1998), the Fourth District analyzed a claim asserted in an error coram nobis petition that the petitioner's plea was involuntary because she had not been informed of the possible deportation consequences of an adjudication of guilt. | 1 | 1999–1999 |
Nickels v. State
green
1 sentence1999The court characterized the claim as alleging an error of fact, rather than an error of law, and stated that coram nobis was the appropriate vehicle through which to seek relief with this kind of claim, and cited Nickels v. State, 86 Fla. 208 , 98 So. 502 (1923), as authority for its conclusion. | 1 | 1999–1999 |
Kalici v. State
neutral
1 sentence1999The court characterized the claim as "traditionally cognizable under coram nobis." Id. | 1 | 1999–1999 |
Opinions by the citing court's state. A doctrine retained in one state and abandoned in another shows up here as a year span that stalls.