Already have an account? Sign in instead.
You stay signed in for 30 days on this browser.
Continue with Google Continue with MicrosoftNo account yet? Create a free one.
We sent a six-digit code.
It expires in ten minutes, works once, and only in this browser. Five wrong tries void it. Send another code.
Your account is live and the Cloudflare checks are off for this browser.
6 Michigan opinions name it 2 courts 1897–1976 0 in the last five years
The cases below were cited by Michigan courts in a sentence that names this issue. Sides come from how each citing opinion treated the case (Syfertize flag on that citation), so a case can appear on both: that is where the law is contested. A red or yellow chip is the case's own overall treatment.
| Case | Followed | Cited |
|---|---|---|
Neeley v. Strattongreen1 sentence1915See Neeley v. Stratton 1 ( 151 N. W. 1045 ), and the many cases cited therein. | 1 | 1 |
Booth v. . Spuyten Duyvil Rolling Mill Co.green1 sentence1897See Booth v. Mill Co., 60 N. Y. 487 ; Richardson v. Chynoweth, 26 Wis. 656 ; Illinois Cent. | 1 | 1 |
| Case | Negative | Cited |
|---|---|---|
| No negative-treatment citations attached to this issue in Michigan. Read the followed side critically anyway. | ||
| Case | Cited | Years |
|---|---|---|
Britten v. Updyke
green
2 sentences1965If there is room for reasonable doubt, the question must be submitted to the jury." On the facts the Court affirmed a directed verdict because (pp 429, 430) "The inevitable conclusion to which all unprejudiced minds must come is that in either event plaintiff was clearly guilty of contributory negligence." [9] Thus Garrigan, 362 Mich 262 , which dealt with statutory presumptions, cited, inter alia, as authority for its conclusions Britten v. Updyke, 357 Mich 466 , dealing with common-law presumptions. 1965If there is room for reasonable doubt, the question must be submitted to the jury.” On the facts the Court affirmed a directed verdict because .(pp 429, 430) “The inevitable conclusion to which all unprejudiced minds must come is that in either event plaintiff was clearly guilty of contributory negligence.” Tims Garrigan, 362 Mich 262 , whieh dealt with statutory presumptions, cited, inter alia, as authority for its conclusions Britten v. Updyke, 357 Mich 466 , dealing with common-law presumptions. | 2 | 1965–1965 |
Garrigan v. LaSalle Coca-Cola Bottling Co.
green
2 sentences1965If there is room for reasonable doubt, the question must be submitted to the jury." On the facts the Court affirmed a directed verdict because (pp 429, 430) "The inevitable conclusion to which all unprejudiced minds must come is that in either event plaintiff was clearly guilty of contributory negligence." [9] Thus Garrigan, 362 Mich 262 , which dealt with statutory presumptions, cited, inter alia, as authority for its conclusions Britten v. Updyke, 357 Mich 466 , dealing with common-law presumptions. 1965If there is room for reasonable doubt, the question must be submitted to the jury.” On the facts the Court affirmed a directed verdict because .(pp 429, 430) “The inevitable conclusion to which all unprejudiced minds must come is that in either event plaintiff was clearly guilty of contributory negligence.” Tims Garrigan, 362 Mich 262 , whieh dealt with statutory presumptions, cited, inter alia, as authority for its conclusions Britten v. Updyke, 357 Mich 466 , dealing with common-law presumptions. | 2 | 1965–1965 |
Staub v. Tripp
neutral
2 sentences1976Young v Thendara, Inc, 328 Mich 42, 49 ; 43 NW2d 58 (1950), Staub v Tripp, 248 Mich 45 ; 226 NW 667 (1929), rev’d on other grounds, on rehearing, 253 Mich 633 ; 235 NW 844 (1931), Grand Rapids Trust Co, supra. However, the more correctly stated rule is that this is so in the absence of legislation to the contrary. 1976Young v Thendara, Inc, 328 Mich 42, 49 ; 43 NW2d 58 (1950), Staub v Tripp, 248 Mich 45 ; 226 NW 667 (1929), rev’d on other grounds, on rehearing, 253 Mich 633 ; 235 NW 844 (1931), Grand Rapids Trust Co, supra. However, the more correctly stated rule is that this is so in the absence of legislation to the contrary. | 1 | 1976–1976 |
Staub v. Tripp
neutral
2 sentences1976Young v Thendara, Inc, 328 Mich 42, 49 ; 43 NW2d 58 (1950), Staub v Tripp, 248 Mich 45 ; 226 NW 667 (1929), rev’d on other grounds, on rehearing, 253 Mich 633 ; 235 NW 844 (1931), Grand Rapids Trust Co, supra. However, the more correctly stated rule is that this is so in the absence of legislation to the contrary. 1976Young v Thendara, Inc, 328 Mich 42, 49 ; 43 NW2d 58 (1950), Staub v Tripp, 248 Mich 45 ; 226 NW 667 (1929), rev’d on other grounds, on rehearing, 253 Mich 633 ; 235 NW 844 (1931), Grand Rapids Trust Co, supra. However, the more correctly stated rule is that this is so in the absence of legislation to the contrary. | 1 | 1976–1976 |
Young v. Thendara, Inc.
green
2 sentences1976Young v Thendara, Inc, 328 Mich 42, 49 ; 43 NW2d 58 (1950), Staub v Tripp, 248 Mich 45 ; 226 NW 667 (1929), rev’d on other grounds, on rehearing, 253 Mich 633 ; 235 NW 844 (1931), Grand Rapids Trust Co, supra. However, the more correctly stated rule is that this is so in the absence of legislation to the contrary. 1976Young v Thendara, Inc, 328 Mich 42, 49 ; 43 NW2d 58 (1950), Staub v Tripp, 248 Mich 45 ; 226 NW 667 (1929), rev’d on other grounds, on rehearing, 253 Mich 633 ; 235 NW 844 (1931), Grand Rapids Trust Co, supra. However, the more correctly stated rule is that this is so in the absence of legislation to the contrary. | 1 | 1976–1976 |
Battishill v. Humphreys
green
1 sentence1921After discussing somewhat at length the question of defendant’s negligence, and citing upon that question Battishill v. Humphreys, 64 Mich. 514 ; Davis v. Railroad Co., 142 Mich. 382 , and Smith v. Railroad Co., 136 Mich. 224 , counsel then proceed to discuss the question of contributory negligence of the plaintiff’s decedent under the evidence in the case, contending that the question presented was one for the consideration of the jury. | 1 | 1921–1921 |
Smith v. Pere Marquette Railroad
neutral
1 sentence1921After discussing somewhat at length the question of defendant’s negligence, and citing upon that question Battishill v. Humphreys, 64 Mich. 514 ; Davis v. Railroad Co., 142 Mich. 382 , and Smith v. Railroad Co., 136 Mich. 224 , counsel then proceed to discuss the question of contributory negligence of the plaintiff’s decedent under the evidence in the case, contending that the question presented was one for the consideration of the jury. | 1 | 1921–1921 |
Davis v. Michigan Central Railroad
neutral
1 sentence1921After discussing somewhat at length the question of defendant’s negligence, and citing upon that question Battishill v. Humphreys, 64 Mich. 514 ; Davis v. Railroad Co., 142 Mich. 382 , and Smith v. Railroad Co., 136 Mich. 224 , counsel then proceed to discuss the question of contributory negligence of the plaintiff’s decedent under the evidence in the case, contending that the question presented was one for the consideration of the jury. | 1 | 1921–1921 |
Richardson v. Chynoweth
green
1 sentence1897See Booth v. Mill Co., 60 N. Y. 487 ; Richardson v. Chynoweth, 26 Wis. 656 ; Illinois Cent. | 1 | 1897–1897 |
Opinions by the citing court's state. A doctrine retained in one state and abandoned in another shows up here as a year span that stalls.