Already have an account? Sign in instead.
You stay signed in for 30 days on this browser.
Continue with Google Continue with MicrosoftNo account yet? Create a free one.
We sent a six-digit code.
It expires in ten minutes, works once, and only in this browser. Five wrong tries void it. Send another code.
Your account is live and the Cloudflare checks are off for this browser.
6 Michigan opinions name it 2 courts 2002–2021 2 in the last five years
The cases below were cited by Michigan courts in a sentence that names this issue. Sides come from how each citing opinion treated the case (Syfertize flag on that citation), so a case can appear on both: that is where the law is contested. A red or yellow chip is the case's own overall treatment.
| Case | Followed | Cited |
|---|---|---|
Huffman v. Indiana Office of Environmental Adjudicationgreen2 sentences2021Cf. Huffman v Indiana Office of Environmental Adjudication, 811 NE2d 806, 812-813 (Ind, 2004) (finding that an Indiana ALJ should not have invoked the judicial doctrine of standing because “the statute, and only the statute, defines the class of persons who can seek administrative review of agency action”). 11 mootness into this specific contested hearing process. 2021Cf. Huffman v Indiana Office of Environmental Adjudication, 811 NE2d 806, 812-813 (Ind, 2004) (finding that an Indiana ALJ should not have invoked the judicial doctrine of standing because “the statute, and only the statute, defines the class of persons who can seek administrative review of agency action”). 11 mootness into this specific contested hearing process. | 2 | 2 |
| Case | Negative | Cited |
|---|---|---|
| No negative-treatment citations attached to this issue in Michigan. Read the followed side critically anyway. | ||
| Case | Cited | Years |
|---|---|---|
People v. Armisted
green
1 sentence2015The “grant of parole generally constitutes permission to leave confinement with certain restrictions.” Armisted, 295 Mich App at 38-39 . | 1 | 2015–2015 |
People v. Cunningham
red
1 sentence2015It is within that context that the Legislature created the exception from being an “escapee” for persons “violating the conditions of a parole.” Id. | 1 | 2015–2015 |
In Re BKD
green
1 sentence2009But the Legislature created an exception to this general rule in MCL 710.25(2), which states that “[a]n adjournment or continuance of a proceeding under this chapter shall not be granted without a showing of good cause.” Furthermore, while petitioners and Keilman are correct that the Adoption Code generally protects the parental rights of putative fathers, see In re BKD, 246 Mich App at 221-222 , there may be circumstances in which a putative father makes a showing of good cause to stay adoption proceedings in favor of a paternity action. | 1 | 2009–2009 |
MacK v. City of Detroit
green
2 sentences2007Id. 2007Id. | 1 | 2007–2007 |
People v. Webb
green
2 sentences2002In addition, the Legislature created an exception to the crime when the presence of alcohol in a minor’s body resulted from consumption of alcohol for religious ceremonies. “[W]hen this Court construes two statutes that arguably relate to the same subject or share a common purpose, the statutes are in pari materia and must be read together as one law, even if they contain no reference to one another and were enacted on different dates.” People v Webb, 458 Mich 265, 274 ; 580 NW2d 884 (1998). 2002In addition, the Legislature created an exception to the crime when the presence of alcohol in a minor’s body resulted from consumption of alcohol for religious ceremonies. “[W]hen this Court construes two statutes that arguably relate to the same subject or share a common purpose, the statutes are in pari materia and must be read together as one law, even if they contain no reference to one another and were enacted on different dates.” People v Webb, 458 Mich 265, 274 ; 580 NW2d 884 (1998). | 1 | 2002–2002 |
Opinions by the citing court's state. A doctrine retained in one state and abandoned in another shows up here as a year span that stalls.