five part test (Minnesota) · Go Syfert
← Minnesota issues

five part test in Minnesota

6 Minnesota opinions name it 1 courts 1984–1988 0 in the last five years

The cases below were cited by Minnesota courts in a sentence that names this issue. Sides come from how each citing opinion treated the case (Syfertize flag on that citation), so a case can appear on both: that is where the law is contested. A red or yellow chip is the case's own overall treatment.

Followed or applied (3)

CaseFollowedCited
Arthur H. Aftanase v. Economy Baler Company, a Corporationgreen
ca8 · 1965 · cited in 4 Minnesota opinions naming this issue, 1984–1985
2 sentences

1985To determine jurisdiction over nonresidents, Minnesota uses the five part test developed in Aftanase v. Economy Baler Co., 343 F.2d 187, 197 (8th Cir.1965).

1985To determine jurisdiction over nonresidents, Minnesota uses the five part test developed in Aftanase v. Economy Baler Co., 343 F.2d 187, 197 (8th Cir.1965).

44
State v. Jonesgreen
minn · 1978 · cited in 1 Minnesota opinions naming this issue, 1988–1988
2 sentences

1988Balancing probative value and prejudice under rule 609 is governed by the five part analysis of State v. Jones, 271 N.W.2d 534, 537-38 (Minn.1978).

1988Balancing probative value and prejudice under rule 609 is governed by the five part analysis of State v. Jones, 271 N.W.2d 534, 537-38 (Minn.1978).

11
Janssen v. Johnsongreen
minnctapp · 1984 · cited in 1 Minnesota opinions naming this issue, 1985–1985
1 sentence

1985Janssen v. Johnson, 358 N.W.2d 117, 119 (Minn.Ct.App.1984).

11

Distinguished, questioned or overruled (0)

CaseNegativeCited
No negative-treatment citations attached to this issue in Minnesota. Read the followed side critically anyway.

Statutes the citing opinions construe

MN § Minn. Stat. § 543.19 (5)

Counted by distinct opinions that both name this issue and are annotated to the section; sections every opinion cites regardless of issue are not filtered here, so read the counts against the total above.

Where else courts name it

PA 7 (1988–2020) MN 6 (1984–1988) WA 6 (2010–2016) OH 4 (1998–2016) TX 4 (1988–1997) CT 3 (1996–2014) MT 3 (1992–2013) WY 3 (1988–1994)

Opinions by the citing court's state. A doctrine retained in one state and abandoned in another shows up here as a year span that stalls.

← Caselaw search · G Cite Topics · Brief Check