6 Minnesota opinions name it 1 courts 1984–1987 0 in the last five years
The cases below were cited by Minnesota courts in a sentence that names this issue. Sides come from how each citing opinion treated the case (Syfertize flag on that citation), so a case can appear on both: that is where the law is contested. A red or yellow chip is the case's own overall treatment.
| Case | Followed | Cited |
|---|---|---|
Marriage of Leach v. Leachgreen2 sentences1987Although the court must consider the factors outlined in the statute, Leach v. Leach, 356 N.W.2d 378 (Minn.Ct.App.1984), individual findings on each specific factor are not required. 1986“The court must consider the factors outlined in Minn.Stat. § 518.552, subd. 2.” Leach v. Leach, 356 N.W.2d 378, 379 (Minn.Ct.App.1984). | 1 | 2 |
Marriage of Price v. Pricegreen1 sentence1987Price, 390 N.W.2d at 485 (citations omitted) (footnote omitted). | 1 | 1 |
| Case | Negative | Cited |
|---|---|---|
| No negative-treatment citations attached to this issue in Minnesota. Read the followed side critically anyway. | ||
| Case | Cited | Years |
|---|---|---|
Rosenfeld v. Rosenfeld
green
2 sentences1985Rosenfeld v. Rosenfeld, 311 Minn. 76 , 249 N.W.2d 168 (1976). 1985Rosenfeld v. Rosenfeld, 311 Minn. 76 , 249 N.W.2d 168 (1976). | 2 | 1984–1985 |
Justis v. Justis
green
1 sentence1987Justis v. Justis, 384 N.W.2d 885 (Minn.Ct.App.1986). | 1 | 1987–1987 |
Marriage of Otis v. Otis
green
1 sentence1984The husband contends that Otis v. Otis, 299 N.W.2d 114 (Minn.1980), controls. | 1 | 1984–1984 |
Counted by distinct opinions that both name this issue and are annotated to the section; sections every opinion cites regardless of issue are not filtered here, so read the counts against the total above.
Opinions by the citing court's state. A doctrine retained in one state and abandoned in another shows up here as a year span that stalls.