Already have an account? Sign in instead.
You stay signed in for 30 days on this browser.
Continue with Google Continue with MicrosoftNo account yet? Create a free one.
We sent a six-digit code.
It expires in ten minutes, works once, and only in this browser. Five wrong tries void it. Send another code.
Your account is live and the Cloudflare checks are off for this browser.
8 Florida opinions name it 1 courts 1995–2011 0 in the last five years
The cases below were cited by Florida courts in a sentence that names this issue. Sides come from how each citing opinion treated the case (Syfertize flag on that citation), so a case can appear on both: that is where the law is contested. A red or yellow chip is the case's own overall treatment.
| Case | Followed | Cited |
|---|---|---|
Nichols v. Nicholsgreen1 sentence2009See Nichols v. Nichols, 907 So.2d 620 (Fla. 4th DCA 2005). | 1 | 1 |
Adair v. Adairgreen1 sentence2008Adair v. Adair, 720 So.2d 316, 317 (Fla. 4th DCA 1998); Murphy v. Murphy, 621 So.2d 455, 456 (Fla. 4th DCA 1993). | 1 | 1 |
Murphy v. Murphygreen1 sentence2008Adair v. Adair, 720 So.2d 316, 317 (Fla. 4th DCA 1998); Murphy v. Murphy, 621 So.2d 455, 456 (Fla. 4th DCA 1993). | 1 | 1 |
O'Connor v. O'Connorgreen2 sentences2007As to the need, the court must consider the standard of living enjoyed during the marriage and each party's age, health, and earning ability. " O'Connor v. O'Connor, 782 So.2d 502, 503 (Fla. 2d DCA 2001) (emphasis added). 2007Section 61.08(2)(g) specifically requires consideration of "[a]ll sources of income available to either party." The trial court thus must consider the "ability [of the party seeking alimony] to contribute to her own support." O'Connor, 782 So.2d at 504 ; see also Shrove v. Shrove, 724 So.2d 679, 682 (Fla. 4th DCA 1999) ("As to the imputation of income to the [spouse seeking alimony], the amount of income a spouse [seeking alimony] may be able to earn is a factor the court should consider in determining an alimony award." (citing § 61.08(2)(d), (g), Fla. Stat. (1997))). | 1 | 1 |
Shrove v. Shrovegreen1 sentence2007Section 61.08(2)(g) specifically requires consideration of "[a]ll sources of income available to either party." The trial court thus must consider the "ability [of the party seeking alimony] to contribute to her own support." O'Connor, 782 So.2d at 504 ; see also Shrove v. Shrove, 724 So.2d 679, 682 (Fla. 4th DCA 1999) ("As to the imputation of income to the [spouse seeking alimony], the amount of income a spouse [seeking alimony] may be able to earn is a factor the court should consider in determining an alimony award." (citing § 61.08(2)(d), (g), Fla. Stat. (1997))). | 1 | 1 |
Kozel v. Ostendorfgreen1 sentence2006Before the trial court can enter such an extreme sanction, the court must consider the factors set forth in Kozel v. Ostendorf, 629 So.2d 817, 818 (Fla.1994), for imposing such a severe sanction. | 1 | 1 |
Kinney System, Inc. v. Continental Ins. Co.green1 sentence1997See Kinney Sys., 674 So.2d at 92 . | 1 | 1 |
| Case | Negative | Cited |
|---|---|---|
| No negative-treatment citations attached to this issue in Florida. Read the followed side critically anyway. | ||
| Case | Cited | Years |
|---|---|---|
Kovalchick v. Kovalchick
green
1 sentence2011“In determining a proper award of alimony, a court must consider the factors set forth in section 61.08(2), Florida Statutes.” Id. | 1 | 2011–2011 |
Canakaris v. Canakaris
green
1 sentence2001Canakaris v. Canakaris, 382 So.2d 1197 (Fla.1980). | 1 | 2001–2001 |
Porteous v. State
green
1 sentence1995Porteous v. State, 582 So.2d 130 (Fla. 2d DCA1991). | 1 | 1995–1995 |
Counted by distinct opinions that both name this issue and are annotated to the section; sections every opinion cites regardless of issue are not filtered here, so read the counts against the total above.
Opinions by the citing court's state. A doctrine retained in one state and abandoned in another shows up here as a year span that stalls.