Already have an account? Sign in instead.
You stay signed in for 30 days on this browser.
Continue with Google Continue with MicrosoftNo account yet? Create a free one.
We sent a six-digit code.
It expires in ten minutes, works once, and only in this browser. Five wrong tries void it. Send another code.
Your account is live and the Cloudflare checks are off for this browser.
6 Minnesota opinions name it 2 courts 1966–2017 0 in the last five years
The cases below were cited by Minnesota courts in a sentence that names this issue. Sides come from how each citing opinion treated the case (Syfertize flag on that citation), so a case can appear on both: that is where the law is contested. A red or yellow chip is the case's own overall treatment.
| Case | Followed | Cited |
|---|---|---|
Jason Donald Matakis v. State of Minnesotagreen1 sentence2017Id. at 34, 40 . | 1 | 1 |
State, by Peterson v. Andersongreen2 sentences1989See, e.g., City of Duluth v. State, 390 N.W.2d 757, 762 (Minn.1986); City of Minneapolis v. Wurtele, 291 N.W.2d 386, 389 (Minn.1980); State v. Anderson, 220 Minn. 139, 146 , 19 N.W.2d 70, 74 (Minn.1945). 1989See, e.g., City of Duluth v. State, 390 N.W.2d 757, 762 (Minn.1986); City of Minneapolis v. Wurtele, 291 N.W.2d 386, 389 (Minn.1980); State v. Anderson, 220 Minn. 139, 146 , 19 N.W.2d 70, 74 (Minn.1945). | 1 | 1 |
City of Minneapolis v. Wurtelegreen1 sentence1989See, e.g., City of Duluth v. State, 390 N.W.2d 757, 762 (Minn.1986); City of Minneapolis v. Wurtele, 291 N.W.2d 386, 389 (Minn.1980); State v. Anderson, 220 Minn. 139, 146 , 19 N.W.2d 70, 74 (Minn.1945). | 1 | 1 |
City of Duluth v. Stategreen1 sentence1989See, e.g., City of Duluth v. State, 390 N.W.2d 757, 762 (Minn.1986); City of Minneapolis v. Wurtele, 291 N.W.2d 386, 389 (Minn.1980); State v. Anderson, 220 Minn. 139, 146 , 19 N.W.2d 70, 74 (Minn.1945). | 1 | 1 |
Auge v. Augered2 sentences1984In Auge v. Auge, 334 N.W.2d 393 (Minn.1983) the Minnesota Supreme Court discussed the right to an evidentiary hearing where a custodial parent petitions the court for permission to move a child to another state. 1984The Auge court noted that “denial of permission to remove would effect a change of custody in many cases,” Id., at 397 (emphasis supplied), since if a custodial parent moves out of the state without being allowed to take the child, physical custody would in effect be changed to the non-custodial parent. | 1 | 1 |
| Case | Negative | Cited |
|---|---|---|
| No negative-treatment citations attached to this issue in Minnesota. Read the followed side critically anyway. | ||
| Case | Cited | Years |
|---|---|---|
Marriage of Nice-Petersen v. Nice-Petersen
green
1 sentence1984She contends that this is an implicit finding that Chad was in Morey’s custody. 2 As she asserts, change of custody can be denied without a hearing when a prima facie case for change is not shown in affidavits, Nice-Petersen v. Nice-Petersen, 310 N.W.2d 471 (Minn.1981), and Minn.Stat. § 518.18 (1982) establishes a narrow standard for modification. 3 We agree with appellant that there has been no prior adjudication of Chad Morey’s custody and hold that as a matter of law, under the facts of this case, Gilbert Peppin has a right to an evidentiary hearing on the question of the award of custody t | 1 | 1984–1984 |
Marriage of Hummel v. Hummel
green
2 sentences1984In Hummel v. Hummel, 304 N.W.2d 19 (Minn.1981), the supreme court found no waiver where, after a motion for change of custody, [e]ach party filed affidavits in support of the respective motions and both parties’ counsel presented unrecorded oral arguments on the custody and contempt issues. 304 N.W.2d at 20 . 1984In Hummel v. Hummel, 304 N.W.2d 19 (Minn.1981), the supreme court found no waiver where, after a motion for change of custody, [e]ach party filed affidavits in support of the respective motions and both parties’ counsel presented unrecorded oral arguments on the custody and contempt issues. 304 N.W.2d at 20 . | 1 | 1984–1984 |
State v. DeCloux
green
2 sentences1966In State v. DeCloux, 272 Minn. 94 , 136 N. W. (2d) 657 , we remanded to the district court, for further consideration in the light of our Dinneen decision, a claim that perjured testimony had been given by two codefendants at the petitioner’s trial. 1966In State v. DeCloux, 272 Minn. 94 , 136 N. W. (2d) 657 , we remanded to the district court, for further consideration in the light of our Dinneen decision, a claim that perjured testimony had been given by two codefendants at the petitioner’s trial. | 1 | 1966–1966 |
State Ex Rel. Becker v. Tahash
neutral
2 sentences1966Becker v. Tahash, 265 Minn. 458 , 122 N. W. (2d) 100 , certiorari denied, 375 U. S. 875 , 84 S. Ct. 167 , 11 L. ed. (2d) 121. 4 In that case the petitioner claimed in an application for a writ of habeas corpus that he had been denied due process of law in that he was induced to enter a plea of guilty by the misrepresentations and threats of the prosecuting attorney that petitioner would be charged as a habitual offender if he pleaded not guilty, but would not be so charged if he pleaded guilty. 1966Becker v. Tahash, 265 Minn. 458 , 122 N. W. (2d) 100 , certiorari denied, 375 U. S. 875 , 84 S. Ct. 167 , 11 L. ed. (2d) 121. 4 In that case the petitioner claimed in an application for a writ of habeas corpus that he had been denied due process of law in that he was induced to enter a plea of guilty by the misrepresentations and threats of the prosecuting attorney that petitioner would be charged as a habitual offender if he pleaded not guilty, but would not be so charged if he pleaded guilty. | 1 | 1966–1966 |
Reynolds v. Sims
neutral
1 sentence1966Becker v. Tahash, 265 Minn. 458 , 122 N. W. (2d) 100 , certiorari denied, 375 U. S. 875 , 84 S. Ct. 167 , 11 L. ed. (2d) 121. 4 In that case the petitioner claimed in an application for a writ of habeas corpus that he had been denied due process of law in that he was induced to enter a plea of guilty by the misrepresentations and threats of the prosecuting attorney that petitioner would be charged as a habitual offender if he pleaded not guilty, but would not be so charged if he pleaded guilty. | 1 | 1966–1966 |
Smith & Co. v. Southern Ry.
green
1 sentence1966Becker v. Tahash, 265 Minn. 458 , 122 N. W. (2d) 100 , certiorari denied, 375 U. S. 875 , 84 S. Ct. 167 , 11 L. ed. (2d) 121. 4 In that case the petitioner claimed in an application for a writ of habeas corpus that he had been denied due process of law in that he was induced to enter a plea of guilty by the misrepresentations and threats of the prosecuting attorney that petitioner would be charged as a habitual offender if he pleaded not guilty, but would not be so charged if he pleaded guilty. | 1 | 1966–1966 |
Opinions by the citing court's state. A doctrine retained in one state and abandoned in another shows up here as a year span that stalls.