approval doctrine in Missouri

6 Missouri opinions name it 2 courts 1883–2018 0 in the last five years

The cases below were cited by Missouri courts in a sentence that names this issue. Sides come from how each citing opinion treated the case (Syfertize flag on that citation), so a case can appear on both: that is where the law is contested. A red or yellow chip is the case's own overall treatment.

Followed or applied (2)

Case	Followed	Cited
Smith v. Worshamgreen moctapp · 1977 · cited in 1 Missouri opinions naming this issue, 1980–1980 1 sentence 1980Smith v. Worsham, 552 S.W.2d 367, 372 (Mo.App.1977); National Heater Co. v. Corrigan Co. Mechanical Contractors, Inc., 482 F.2d 87 (8th Cir. 1973).	1	1
State v. Yeokumgreen moctapp · 1974 · cited in 1 Missouri opinions naming this issue, 1975–1975 1 sentence 1975State v. Yeokum, 516 S.W.2d 535, 536-537 (Mo.App.1974).	1	1

Distinguished, questioned or overruled (0)

Case	Negative	Cited
No negative-treatment citations attached to this issue in Missouri. Read the followed side critically anyway.

Also cited on this issue (10)

Case	Cited	Years
O'Connell v. School District of Springfield R-12 green mo · 1992 1 sentence 2018In addition to the defective point relied on, Objectors' Statement of Facts was argumentative and failed to support every factual assertion with a record citation, as noted in footnote 2, supra , and Objectors failed to file a complete record on appeal in violation of their duty as appellants under Rule 81.12(a) and (b), as noted in footnotes 8 and 9, supra. The term sheet attached to Plaintiffs' request for preliminary approval plainly identified that "[r]eimbursement of Class Counsel's attorney fees and expenses [would be] in an amount not to exceed $700,000.00." Plaintiffs' actual attorneys	1	2018–2018
National Heater Company, Inc. v. Corrigan Company Mechanical Contractors, Inc. green ca8 · 1973 1 sentence 1980Smith v. Worsham, 552 S.W.2d 367, 372 (Mo.App.1977); National Heater Co. v. Corrigan Co. Mechanical Contractors, Inc., 482 F.2d 87 (8th Cir. 1973).	1	1980–1980
Memorial Hospital v. Oakes, Adm'x green va · 1959 1 sentence 1961Gregory v. Salem General Hospital, 175 Or. 464 , 153 P.2d 837, 845 ; Landgraver, supra; Memorial Hospital, Inc. v. *640 Oakes, 200 Va. 878 , 108 S.E.2d 388, 396 .	1	1961–1961
Memorial Hospital, Inc. v. Oakes green va · 1959 1 sentence 1961Gregory v. Salem General Hospital, 175 Or. 464 , 153 P.2d 837, 845 ; Landgraver, supra; Memorial Hospital, Inc. v. *640 Oakes, 200 Va. 878 , 108 S.E.2d 388, 396 .	1	1961–1961
Gregory v. Salem General Hospital green or · 1944 2 sentences 1961Gregory v. Salem General Hospital, 175 Or. 464 , 153 P.2d 837, 845 ; Landgraver, supra; Memorial Hospital, Inc. v. 640 Oakes, 200 Va. 878 , 108 S.E.2d 388, 396 . 1961Gregory v. Salem General Hospital, 175 Or. 464 , 153 P.2d 837, 845 ; Landgraver, supra; Memorial Hospital, Inc. v. 640 Oakes, 200 Va. 878 , 108 S.E.2d 388, 396 .	1	1961–1961
Julian v. Abbott neutral · 1881 1 sentence 1888Abbott, 73 Mo. 580, 582 .	1	1888–1888
Clarkson v. Buchanan neutral mo · 1873 1 sentence 1883Clarkson v. Buchanan, 53 Mo. 563 ; Campbell v. Wortman, 58 Mo. 258 ; Railroad Co. v. Snead, 65 Mo. 239 ; Funkhouser v. Peck, 67 Mo. 19 , But an examination of the statement and opinion in the case as reported in the federal court, shows that the principle announced below was accepted with a very important qualification.	1	1883–1883
Campbell v. Wortman green mo · 1874 1 sentence 1883Clarkson v. Buchanan, 53 Mo. 563 ; Campbell v. Wortman, 58 Mo. 258 ; Railroad Co. v. Snead, 65 Mo. 239 ; Funkhouser v. Peck, 67 Mo. 19 , But an examination of the statement and opinion in the case as reported in the federal court, shows that the principle announced below was accepted with a very important qualification.	1	1883–1883
Hannibal & St. Joseph R. R. v. Snead neutral mo · 1877 1 sentence 1883Clarkson v. Buchanan, 53 Mo. 563 ; Campbell v. Wortman, 58 Mo. 258 ; Railroad Co. v. Snead, 65 Mo. 239 ; Funkhouser v. Peck, 67 Mo. 19 , But an examination of the statement and opinion in the case as reported in the federal court, shows that the principle announced below was accepted with a very important qualification.	1	1883–1883
Funkhouser v. Peck neutral mo · 1877 1 sentence 1883Clarkson v. Buchanan, 53 Mo. 563 ; Campbell v. Wortman, 58 Mo. 258 ; Railroad Co. v. Snead, 65 Mo. 239 ; Funkhouser v. Peck, 67 Mo. 19 , But an examination of the statement and opinion in the case as reported in the federal court, shows that the principle announced below was accepted with a very important qualification.	1	1883–1883

Where else courts name it

CA 39 (1923–2023) TX 21 (1874–2015) OR 13 (1923–2026) NY 13 (1921–2016) CT 13 (1896–2010) IL 9 (1972–2019) AL 9 (1909–2026) PA 8 (1985–2023) FL 8 (1921–2023) NJ 7 (1846–1995) WA 7 (1904–2010) IA 6 (1956–2023) MO 6 (1883–2018) AZ 6 (1942–2016) IN 5 (1895–1997) MA 5 (1944–2017) KS 5 (1902–2002) DC 5 (1963–2009) DE 4 (2010–2023) WI 4 (1969–2021) NC 4 (1922–2011) OH 4 (1987–2014) VA 3 (1924–1958) NE 3 (1905–1994) VT 3 (1923–2016) MD 3 (1987–2022) AR 3 (1934–2001) GA 3 (1939–1996) SC 3 (1934–2023) MI 2 (1992–2006) WY 2 (1987–2017) LA 2 (1927–1980) ID 2 (2001–2023) MT 2 (1912–1926) TN 2 (1943–2016) KY 2 (1926–1991) NM 2 (2011–2012) SD 2 (1931–1946)

Opinions by the citing court's state. A doctrine retained in one state and abandoned in another shows up here as a year span that stalls.

← Caselaw search · G Cite Topics · Brief Check