Already have an account? Sign in instead.
You stay signed in for 30 days on this browser.
Continue with Google Continue with MicrosoftNo account yet? Create a free one.
We sent a six-digit code.
It expires in ten minutes, works once, and only in this browser. Five wrong tries void it. Send another code.
Your account is live and the Cloudflare checks are off for this browser.
5 Indiana opinions name it 2 courts 1895–1997 0 in the last five years
The cases below were cited by Indiana courts in a sentence that names this issue. Sides come from how each citing opinion treated the case (Syfertize flag on that citation), so a case can appear on both: that is where the law is contested. A red or yellow chip is the case's own overall treatment.
| Case | Followed | Cited |
|---|---|---|
| No positive-treatment citations attached to this issue in Indiana. | ||
| Case | Negative | Cited |
|---|---|---|
| No negative-treatment citations attached to this issue in Indiana. Read the followed side critically anyway. | ||
| Case | Cited | Years |
|---|---|---|
Peavler v. BD. OF COM'RS MONROE CTY.
green
1 sentence1997The committee reviews the proposed standard and considers “all of the social, economic, political, and public policy concerns *196 which may be caused by the approval of the standard.” Id. | 1 | 1997–1997 |
Warren v. State
green
2 sentences1969In other words, if the will of such person is simply overbourne by ungoverned passion or temper and is not the result of a diseased mind then criminal responsibility results from his criminal act.” The above instruction purportedly was given pursuant to the approval of the instruction given in Warren v. State (1963), 243 Ind. 508, 515 , 188 N. E. 2d 108 . 1969In other words, if the will of such person is simply overbourne by ungoverned passion or temper and is not the result of a diseased mind then criminal responsibility results from his criminal act.” The above instruction purportedly was given pursuant to the approval of the instruction given in Warren v. State (1963), 243 Ind. 508, 515 , 188 N. E. 2d 108 . | 1 | 1969–1969 |
Bain, Admx. v. Mattmiller
green
2 sentences1961Support for appellee’s position here is based upon the approval of an instruction in Bain, Admx. v. Mattmiller (1938), 213 Ind. 549, 556 , 13 N. E. 2d 712, 715 , as follows: “ ‘If Charles Bain, plaintiff’s decedent herein was guilty of any negligence, no matter how slight, which proximately contributed to the injury and death referred to in plaintiff’s complaint, your verdict must be for the defendant.’ ” (Our italics.) In sustaining such instruction this court, at page 556 of 213 Ind., said: “As we read this instruction it is in harmony with the law as stated in cases cited. 1 If the plaintif 1961Support for appellee’s position here is based upon the approval of an instruction in Bain, Admx. v. Mattmiller (1938), 213 Ind. 549, 556 , 13 N. E. 2d 712, 715 , as follows: “ ‘If Charles Bain, plaintiff’s decedent herein was guilty of any negligence, no matter how slight, which proximately contributed to the injury and death referred to in plaintiff’s complaint, your verdict must be for the defendant.’ ” (Our italics.) In sustaining such instruction this court, at page 556 of 213 Ind., said: “As we read this instruction it is in harmony with the law as stated in cases cited. 1 If the plaintif | 1 | 1961–1961 |
Livingston v. Rice
green
2 sentences1961Livingston v. Rice (1933), 96 Ind. App. 176 , 184 N. E. 583 , is the other authority cited for the same instruction. 1961Livingston v. Rice (1933), 96 Ind. App. 176 , 184 N. E. 583 , is the other authority cited for the same instruction. | 1 | 1961–1961 |
Cook v. State ex rel. Patterson
green
1 sentence1911The opinion in the case of Cook v. State, ex rel. (1859), 13 Ind. 154 , relied on by counsel, approved an instruction charging the jury that “if Cook [the treasurer], at the expiration of his first term, was a defaulter, and, being his own successor, used funds that came to his hands during his second term, to pay the balance against him at the end of his first term, the securities in the first bond are discharged, and the sureties in the second bond are liable for the money thus appropriated.” But the approval of the instruction is put upon the ground that the condition of the bond was that t | 1 | 1911–1911 |
Reed v. Reed
neutral
1 sentence1895In such a case we would reiterate with the strongest approval the doctrine declared by Reinhard, J., in Reed v. Reed, 6 Ind. App. 317 . | 1 | 1895–1895 |
Opinions by the citing court's state. A doctrine retained in one state and abandoned in another shows up here as a year span that stalls.