Already have an account? Sign in instead.
You stay signed in for 30 days on this browser.
Continue with Google Continue with MicrosoftNo account yet? Create a free one.
We sent a six-digit code.
It expires in ten minutes, works once, and only in this browser. Five wrong tries void it. Send another code.
Your account is live and the Cloudflare checks are off for this browser.
7 Missouri opinions name it 2 courts 1986–2025 2 in the last five years
The cases below were cited by Missouri courts in a sentence that names this issue. Sides come from how each citing opinion treated the case (Syfertize flag on that citation), so a case can appear on both: that is where the law is contested. A red or yellow chip is the case's own overall treatment.
| Case | Followed | Cited |
|---|---|---|
State Ex Rel. Twiehaus v. Adolfgreen2 sentences2024“A defendant acts with malice when he wantonly does that which a man of reasonable intelligence would know to be contrary to his duty and which he intends to be prejudicial or injurious to another.” Alsup, 588 S.W.3d at 190 n.7 (quoting Twiehaus, 706 S.W.2d at 10 447). 2024“The relevant definition of bad faith or malice in this context ordinarily contains a requirement of actual intent to cause injury.” Twiehaus, 706 S.W.2d at 447 . | 1 | 3 |
Kanagawa v. State by and Through Freemanred2 sentences2014Freeman, 685 S.W.2d 831, 835 (Mo. banc 1985)). 9 injury.” Id. at 689 (citing State ex rel. 2014Freeman, 685 S.W.2d 831, 835 (Mo. banc 1985)). 9 injury.” Id. at 689 (citing State ex rel. | 1 | 1 |
Givens v. Sellarsgreen2 sentences1986The relevant definition of bad faith or malice in this context ordinarily contains a requirement of actual intent to cause injury. 3 In Grad v. Kaasa, 321 S.E.2d 888, 890-91 (N.C.1984), the court stated that A defendant acts with malice when he wantonly does that which a man of reasonable intelligence would know to be contrary to his duty and which he intends to be prejudicial or injurious to another, [citation omitted] “An act is wanton when it is done of wicked purpose, or when done needlessly, manifesting a reckless indifference to the rights of others.” [quoting Givens v. Sellars, 273 N.C. 1986The relevant definition of bad faith or malice in this context ordinarily contains a requirement of actual intent to cause injury. 3 In Grad v. Kaasa, 321 S.E.2d 888, 890-91 (N.C.1984), the court stated that A defendant acts with malice when he wantonly does that which a man of reasonable intelligence would know to be contrary to his duty and which he intends to be prejudicial or injurious to another, [citation omitted] “An act is wanton when it is done of wicked purpose, or when done needlessly, manifesting a reckless indifference to the rights of others.” [quoting Givens v. Sellars, 273 N.C. | 1 | 1 |
Grad v. Kaasagreen1 sentence1986The relevant definition of bad faith or malice in this context ordinarily contains a requirement of actual intent to cause injury. 3 In Grad v. Kaasa, 321 S.E.2d 888, 890-91 (N.C.1984), the court stated that A defendant acts with malice when he wantonly does that which a man of reasonable intelligence would know to be contrary to his duty and which he intends to be prejudicial or injurious to another, [citation omitted] “An act is wanton when it is done of wicked purpose, or when done needlessly, manifesting a reckless indifference to the rights of others.” [quoting Givens v. Sellars, 273 N.C. | 1 | 1 |
| Case | Negative | Cited |
|---|---|---|
| No negative-treatment citations attached to this issue in Missouri. Read the followed side critically anyway. | ||
| Case | Cited | Years |
|---|---|---|
State ex rel. Carlos D. Alsup, Relator v. The Honorable James F. Kanatzar
green
2 sentences2025“A defendant acts with malice when he wantonly does that which a man of reasonable intelligence 6 While Appellant does allege that this act violated “LCSD mandated policies” in his brief, he fails to state what that policy is or what it requires or prohibits. 9 would know to be contrary to his duty and which he intends to be prejudicial or injurious to another.” Alsup, 588 S.W.3d at 190 n.7 (quoting Twiehaus, 706 S.W.2d at 447). 2024“A defendant acts with malice when he wantonly does that which a man of reasonable intelligence would know to be contrary to his duty and which he intends to be prejudicial or injurious to another.” Alsup, 588 S.W.3d at 190 n.7 (quoting Twiehaus, 706 S.W.2d at 10 447). | 2 | 2024–2025 |
Davis v. Board of Educ. City of St. Louis
green
2 sentences2015“Bad faith or malice in this context ordinarily contains a requirement of actual intent to cause injury.” Davis, 963 S.W.2d at 689 . 2014“Bad faith or malice in this context ordinarily contains a requirement of actual intent to cause injury.” Id. at 689 (citing State ex rel. | 2 | 2014–2015 |