Already have an account? Sign in instead.
You stay signed in for 30 days on this browser.
Continue with Google Continue with MicrosoftNo account yet? Create a free one.
We sent a six-digit code.
It expires in ten minutes, works once, and only in this browser. Five wrong tries void it. Send another code.
Your account is live and the Cloudflare checks are off for this browser.
6 Missouri opinions name it 1 courts 1989–2018 0 in the last five years
The cases below were cited by Missouri courts in a sentence that names this issue. Sides come from how each citing opinion treated the case (Syfertize flag on that citation), so a case can appear on both: that is where the law is contested. A red or yellow chip is the case's own overall treatment.
| Case | Followed | Cited |
|---|---|---|
| No positive-treatment citations attached to this issue in Missouri. | ||
| Case | Negative | Cited |
|---|---|---|
| No negative-treatment citations attached to this issue in Missouri. Read the followed side critically anyway. | ||
| Case | Cited | Years |
|---|---|---|
State of Missouri v. Amanda N. Bazell
yellow
2 sentences2018Newlon claims that the motion court clearly erred because his convictions on nine counts of the class C felony of stealing and his nine concurrent sentences of five years' imprisonment were unlawful under the Missouri Supreme Court's decision in State v. Bazell , 497 S.W.3d 263 (Mo. banc 2016), and counsel therefore gave ineffective assistance by failing to file a motion to dismiss the charges and by advising him to plead guilty. 2018Miley claims that the motion court clearly erred because his sentence of seven years' imprisonment for committing the class C felony of stealing was unlawful under the Missouri Supreme Court's decision in State v. Bazell , 497 S.W.3d 263 (Mo. banc 2016). | 4 | 2018–2018 |
State v. McCleary
green
1 sentence2016State v. McCleary, 423 S.W.3d 888 (Mo.App.E.D. 2014). 1 McLeary now appeals the denial without an evidentiary hearing of his Rule 29.15 2 motion for post-conviction relief. | 1 | 2016–2016 |
State v. Pilchak
green
1 sentence1989Pilchak’s convictions were affirmed on direct appeal in State v. Pilchak, 655 S.W.2d 646 (Mo.App.1983). | 1 | 1989–1989 |
Opinions by the citing court's state. A doctrine retained in one state and abandoned in another shows up here as a year span that stalls.