6 Missouri opinions name it 1 courts 1994–2016 0 in the last five years
The cases below were cited by Missouri courts in a sentence that names this issue. Sides come from how each citing opinion treated the case (Syfertize flag on that citation), so a case can appear on both: that is where the law is contested. A red or yellow chip is the case's own overall treatment.
| Case | Followed | Cited |
|---|---|---|
Rychnovsky v. Colegreen2 sentences2008Standard of Review “A motion to dismiss is an attack on the petition and solely a test of the adequacy of the pleadings.” Rychnovsky v. Cole, 119 S.W.3d 204, 208 (Mo.App. 2008Standard of Review "A motion to dismiss is an attack on the petition and solely a test of the adequacy of the pleadings." Rychnovsky v. Cole, 119 S.W.3d 204, 208 (Mo.App. | 2 | 2 |
Lucas v. Enkvetchakulgreen1 sentence1994Because the purpose of Rule 55.08 is to provide notice to the plaintiff, Lucas v. Enkvetchakul, 812 S.W.2d 256, 263 (Mo.App.1991), the facts supporting a defense must be pled in the same manner as they would be with claims. | 1 | 1 |
Ashland Oil, Inc. v. Warmanngreen1 sentence1994Ashland Oil, Inc. v. Warmann, 869 S.W.2d 910, 912 (Mo.App.1994). | 1 | 1 |
| Case | Negative | Cited |
|---|---|---|
| No negative-treatment citations attached to this issue in Missouri. Read the followed side critically anyway. | ||
| Case | Cited | Years |
|---|---|---|
State v. Thompson
green
1 sentence2016Id. | 1 | 2016–2016 |
M.M.A. v. L.L.
green
2 sentences2015T.Q.L., 386 S.W.3d at 137-40 . 2015T.Q.L., 386 S.W.3d at 137-40 . | 1 | 2015–2015 |
Rush v. Senior Citizens Nursing Home District
green
1 sentence2008Rush, 212 S.W.3d at 158 . | 1 | 2008–2008 |
Opinions by the citing court's state. A doctrine retained in one state and abandoned in another shows up here as a year span that stalls.