17 Indiana opinions name it 2 courts 1998–2019 0 in the last five years
The cases below were cited by Indiana courts in a sentence that names this issue. Sides come from how each citing opinion treated the case (Syfertize flag on that citation), so a case can appear on both: that is where the law is contested. A red or yellow chip is the case's own overall treatment.
| Case | Followed | Cited |
|---|---|---|
Gorski v. DRR, Inc.green2 sentences2007Gorski v. DRR, Inc., 801 N.E.2d 642, 644-45 (Ind.Ct.App.2003). 2006Gorski v. DRR, Inc., 801 N.E.2d 642, 644-450 (Ind.Ct.App.2003). *1096 Dismissal for failure to state a claim is proper if it is apparent that the facts alleged in the complaint are incapable of supporting relief under any set of cireum-stances. | 4 | 4 |
Hosler Ex Rel. Hosler v. Caterpillar, Inc.green2 sentences2002Hosier v. Caterpillar, Inc., 710 N.E.2d 193, 196 (Ind.Ct.App.1999), trans. denied (citation omitted). 2001Hosler, 710 N.E.2d at 196 . | 2 | 3 |
Godby v. Whiteheadgreen2 sentences2013Godby v. Whitehead, 837 N.E.2d 146, 149 (Ind. Ct. App. 2005), trans. denied. 2006Godby v. Whitehead, 837 N.E.2d 146, 149 (Ind.Ct.App.2005), trams. demied. | 2 | 2 |
Babes Showclub, Jaba, Inc. v. Lairgreen2 sentences2010See Babes Showclub, Jaba, Inc. v. Lair, 918 N.E.2d 308, 310 (Ind.2009). 2010See Babes Showclub, Jaba, Inc. v. Lair, 918 N.E.2d 308, 310 (Ind.2009). | 2 | 2 |
Barany v. Stategreen2 sentences1999See generally Barany v. State, 658 N.E.2d 60, 64 (Ind. 1995) (error is "fundamental” if it is so prejudicial to the rights of the defendant that it makes a fair trial impossible). 1998We agree with Harrison that remand is not necessary because the facts supporting his claim are in the trial record and a legal argument is presented in his brief. 21: See generally Barany v. State , 658 N.E.2d 60, 64 (Ind. 1995) (error is “fundamental” if it is so prejudicial to the rights of the defendant that it makes a fair trial impossible). | 2 | 2 |
Bellwether Properties, LLC v. Duke Energy Indiana, Inc.green2 sentences2019Bellwether Prop., LLC v. Duke Energy Ind., Inc., 87 N.E.3d 462, 466 (Ind. 2017). 2018Bellwether Prop., LLC v. Duke Energy Ind., Inc. , 87 N.E.3d 462 , 466 (Ind. 2017). | 1 | 2 |
| Case | Negative | Cited |
|---|---|---|
| No negative-treatment citations attached to this issue in Indiana. Read the followed side critically anyway. | ||
| Case | Cited | Years |
|---|---|---|
Lawson v. First Union Mortgage Co.
green
1 sentence2005Id. | 1 | 2005–2005 |
Vakos v. Travelers Insurance
green
1 sentence1999Vakos v. Travelers Ins. (1998) Ind.App., 691 N.E.2d 499, 501 , trans. denied. | 1 | 1999–1999 |
Opinions by the citing court's state. A doctrine retained in one state and abandoned in another shows up here as a year span that stalls.