12 Vermont opinions name it 1 courts 2016–2026 9 in the last five years
The cases below were cited by Vermont courts in a sentence that names this issue. Sides come from how each citing opinion treated the case (Syfertize flag on that citation), so a case can appear on both: that is where the law is contested. A red or yellow chip is the case's own overall treatment.
| Case | Followed | Cited |
|---|---|---|
Colby v. Umbrella, Inc.green2 sentences2026First, the Second Amended Complaint does not indicate which of the six Defendants these claims apply to and the allegations are too vague to “show[] that the pleader is entitled to relief.” V.R.C.P. 8(a). 1 While a complaint need not lay out every detail of the facts supporting the claim, see Colby v. Umbrella, Inc., 2008 VT 20, ¶ 13 , 184 Vt. 1 , it must nevertheless “provide[] the defendant with notice of the claims against it.” Sutton v. Vt. 2026First, the Second Amended Complaint does not indicate which of the six Defendants these claims apply to and the allegations are too vague to “show[] that the pleader is entitled to relief.” V.R.C.P. 8(a). 1 While a complaint need not lay out every detail of the facts supporting the claim, see Colby v. Umbrella, Inc., 2008 VT 20, ¶ 13 , 184 Vt. 1 , it must nevertheless “provide[] the defendant with notice of the claims against it.” Sutton v. Vt. | 11 | 12 |
| Case | Negative | Cited |
|---|---|---|
| No negative-treatment citations attached to this issue in Vermont. Read the followed side critically anyway. | ||
Counted by distinct opinions that both name this issue and are annotated to the section; sections every opinion cites regardless of issue are not filtered here, so read the counts against the total above.
Opinions by the citing court's state. A doctrine retained in one state and abandoned in another shows up here as a year span that stalls.