Already have an account? Sign in instead.
You stay signed in for 30 days on this browser.
Continue with Google Continue with MicrosoftNo account yet? Create a free one.
We sent a six-digit code.
It expires in ten minutes, works once, and only in this browser. Five wrong tries void it. Send another code.
Your account is live and the Cloudflare checks are off for this browser.
6 Missouri opinions name it 2 courts 1905–2005 0 in the last five years
The cases below were cited by Missouri courts in a sentence that names this issue. Sides come from how each citing opinion treated the case (Syfertize flag on that citation), so a case can appear on both: that is where the law is contested. A red or yellow chip is the case's own overall treatment.
| Case | Followed | Cited |
|---|---|---|
Zueck v. Oppenheimer Gateway Properties, Inc.green2 sentences1994Zueck v. Oppenheimer Gateway Properties, 809 S.W.2d 384, 384 (Mo. banc 1991). 1991Id. | 1 | 2 |
Ludwinski v. National Couriergreen1 sentence2005Ludwinski v. Nat’l Courier, 873 S.W.2d 890, 892 (Mo.App.1994); Rogers v. Pacesetter Corp., 972 S.W.2d 540, 543 (Mo.App.1998). | 1 | 1 |
Rogers v. Pacesetter Corp.green1 sentence2005Ludwinski v. Nat’l Courier, 873 S.W.2d 890, 892 (Mo.App.1994); Rogers v. Pacesetter Corp., 972 S.W.2d 540, 543 (Mo.App.1998). | 1 | 1 |
| Case | Negative | Cited |
|---|---|---|
| No negative-treatment citations attached to this issue in Missouri. Read the followed side critically anyway. | ||
| Case | Cited | Years |
|---|---|---|
Mallory v. Louisiana Pure Ice & Supply Co.
green
2 sentences1994In Mallory v. Louisiana Pure Ice & Supply Co., 320 Mo. 95 , 6 S.W.2d 617 (banc 1928), this Court extended the inherently dangerous exception to an employee of the independent contractor, making the landowner vicariously liable for the employee’s injuries. 1994In Mallory v. Louisiana Pure Ice & Supply Co., 320 Mo. 95 , 6 S.W.2d 617 (banc 1928), this Court extended the inherently dangerous exception to an employee of the independent contractor, making the landowner vicariously liable for the employee’s injuries. | 2 | 1991–1994 |
Bradley v. Chicago, Milwaukee & St. Paul Railway Co.
green
2 sentences1905Therefore, the obligation' which the law places upon the master is to some extent a relative obligation and only requires him to exercise reasonable care to provide as safe a place for the performance of the services as the character of the work to be done will permit, or in other words, the law requires the master to furnish his servant a suitable place to' do his work, where, by the exercise of ordinary care on his part, he may perform his work with safety or subject only to such hazards as are necessarily incident to the employ-. ment. [Bradley v. Railroad, 138 Mo. 293 , 39 S. W. 763 ; Sull 1905Therefore, the obligation' which the law places upon the master is to some extent a relative obligation and only requires him to exercise reasonable care to provide as safe a place for the performance of the services as the character of the work to be done will permit, or in other words, the law requires the master to furnish his servant a suitable place to' do his work, where, by the exercise of ordinary care on his part, he may perform his work with safety or subject only to such hazards as are necessarily incident to the employ-. ment. [Bradley v. Railroad, 138 Mo. 293 , 39 S. W. 763 ; Sull | 1 | 1905–1905 |
Opinions by the citing court's state. A doctrine retained in one state and abandoned in another shows up here as a year span that stalls.