6 Missouri opinions name it 2 courts 2005–2019 0 in the last five years
The cases below were cited by Missouri courts in a sentence that names this issue. Sides come from how each citing opinion treated the case (Syfertize flag on that citation), so a case can appear on both: that is where the law is contested. A red or yellow chip is the case's own overall treatment.
| Case | Followed | Cited |
|---|---|---|
Missouri v. Seibertgreen2 sentences2009Id. at 615 , 124 S.Ct. 2601 . 2009Id. at 615 , 124 S.Ct. 2601 . | 1 | 3 |
McCoy v. THE HERSHEWE LAW FIRM, PCgreen1 sentence2013To determine what constitutes a reasonable attorneys’ fee value in quantum meruit, consideration must be given to: “(1) the time, nature, character and amount of services rendered; (2) the nature and importance of the litigation; (3) the degree of responsibility imposed on or incurred by the attorney; (4) the amount of property or money involved; (5) the degree of professional ability, skill and experience that was called for and used; and (6) the result that was achieved.” McCoy v. The Hershewe Law Firm, P.C., 366 S.W.3d 586, 597 (Mo.App. | 1 | 1 |
| Case | Negative | Cited |
|---|---|---|
| No negative-treatment citations attached to this issue in Missouri. Read the followed side critically anyway. | ||
| Case | Cited | Years |
|---|---|---|
Moore v. Texas
green
1 sentence2019Moore I, 137 S. Ct. at 1044 ; Moore II, 139 S. Ct. at 671 . | 1 | 2019–2019 |
Moore v. Texas
green
1 sentence2019Moore I, 137 S. Ct. at 1044 ; Moore II, 139 S. Ct. at 671 . | 1 | 2019–2019 |
Berry v. Volkswagen Group of America, Inc.
green
1 sentence2017Berry, 397 S.W.3d at 431 . | 1 | 2017–2017 |
Opinions by the citing court's state. A doctrine retained in one state and abandoned in another shows up here as a year span that stalls.