Already have an account? Sign in instead.
You stay signed in for 30 days on this browser.
Continue with Google Continue with MicrosoftNo account yet? Create a free one.
We sent a six-digit code.
It expires in ten minutes, works once, and only in this browser. Five wrong tries void it. Send another code.
Your account is live and the Cloudflare checks are off for this browser.
9 New York opinions name it 4 courts 1993–2026 1 in the last five years
The cases below were cited by New York courts in a sentence that names this issue. Sides come from how each citing opinion treated the case (Syfertize flag on that citation), so a case can appear on both: that is where the law is contested. A red or yellow chip is the case's own overall treatment.
| Case | Followed | Cited |
|---|---|---|
Denny v. Ford Motor Co.green1 sentence2019These factors are “rooted in a recognition that there are both risks and benefits associated with many products and . . . instances in which a product’s inherent dangers cannot be eliminated without simultaneously compromising or completely nullifying its benefits” (Denny v Ford Motor Co., 87 NY2d 248, 257 [1995]). | 1 | 1 |
Yun Tung Chow v. Reckitt & Colman, Inc.green1 sentence2019In Voss, we identified a series of factors that are relevant to the jury’s risk-utility analysis, including: (1) the product’s utility “to the public as a whole and to the individual user; (2) the nature of the product – that is, the likelihood that it will cause injury; (3) the availability of a safer design; (4) the potential for designing and manufacturing the product so that it is safer but remains functional and reasonably priced; (5) the ability of the plaintiff to have avoided injury by careful use of the product; (6) the degree of awareness of the potential danger of the product which | 1 | 1 |
Pennsylvania v. Munizgreen1 sentence2017When, in response to an officer’s pedigree question as to his address, defendant acknowledged he resided in the apartment where he was arrested and where the contraband at issue was found, warnings were not required because this routine administrative question, which was part of a series of standard booking questions such as name, address, and so forth, was not designed to elicit an incriminating response (see Pennsylvania v Muniz, 496 US 582, 601-602 [1990]; People v Rodney, 85 NY2d 289, 292-294 [1995]; People v Watts, 309 AD2d 628 [1st Dept 2003], lv denied 1 NY3d 582 [2003]), even if the an | 1 | 1 |
People v. Rodneygreen1 sentence2017When, in response to an officer’s pedigree question as to his address, defendant acknowledged he resided in the apartment where he was arrested and where the contraband at issue was found, warnings were not required because this routine administrative question, which was part of a series of standard booking questions such as name, address, and so forth, was not designed to elicit an incriminating response (see Pennsylvania v Muniz, 496 US 582, 601-602 [1990]; People v Rodney, 85 NY2d 289, 292-294 [1995]; People v Watts, 309 AD2d 628 [1st Dept 2003], lv denied 1 NY3d 582 [2003]), even if the an | 1 | 1 |
Fallon v. Espositogreen1 sentence2015Thus, we cannot find that the verdict was against the weight of the evidence (see Fallon v Esposito, 35 AD3d 1067, 1068 [2006]; Cocca v Conway, 283 AD2d 787, 788-789 [2001], lv denied 96 NY2d 721 [2001]). | 1 | 1 |
Cocca v. Conwaygreen1 sentence2015Thus, we cannot find that the verdict was against the weight of the evidence (see Fallon v Esposito, 35 AD3d 1067, 1068 [2006]; Cocca v Conway, 283 AD2d 787, 788-789 [2001], lv denied 96 NY2d 721 [2001]). | 1 | 1 |
Brown Shoe Co. v. United Statesgreen1 sentence2012The United States Supreme Court in Brown Shoe Co. v United States ( 370 US 294, 325 [1962]) provided a series of factors for determining whether a submarket exists, including “industry or public recognition of the submarket as a separate economic entity, the product’s peculiar characteristics and uses, . . . [and] distinct prices.” In this case, the tickets sold by plaintiff do not have any peculiar characteristics, but rather provide the consumer with the same product and experience as a ticket purchased through any of the other distribution channels. | 1 | 1 |
| Case | Negative | Cited |
|---|---|---|
| No negative-treatment citations attached to this issue in New York. Read the followed side critically anyway. | ||
| Case | Cited | Years |
|---|---|---|
People v. Mingo
green
2 sentences2012The risk assessment instrument developed by the Board “contains a series of factors that permit the assignment of specified point values depending on the characteristics of the victim, the circumstances surrounding the crime, a defendant’s prior history of sexual offenses, and the like” (People v Mingo, 12 NY3d 563 , 568 n 2 [2009]). 2012The risk assessment instrument developed by the Board “contains a series of factors that permit the assignment of specified point values depending on the characteristics of the victim, the circumstances surrounding the crime, a defendant’s prior history of sexual offenses, and the like” (People v Mingo, 12 NY3d 563 , 568 n 2 [2009]). | 2 | 2012–2012 |
New York University v. Farkas
green
2 sentences2026In Farkas , the seminal case addressing discovery in summary eviction proceedings, the court identified a series of factors for consideration in determining whether a party has ample need for discovery, including whether there is a need to determine information related to a cause of action, whether the disclosure is likely to clarify disputed facts, whether prejudice would result from a grant of leave to conduct discovery, and whether such prejudice could be mitigated ( id. ). 2026In Farkas , the seminal case addressing discovery in summary eviction proceedings, the court identified a series of factors for consideration in determining whether a party has ample need for discovery, including whether there is a need to determine information related to a cause of action, whether the disclosure is likely to clarify disputed facts, whether prejudice would result from a grant of leave to conduct discovery, and whether such prejudice could be mitigated ( id. ). | 1 | 2026–2026 |
Williamson v. PRICEWATERHOUSECOOPERS LLP
green
1 sentence2017When, in response to an officer’s pedigree question as to his address, defendant acknowledged he resided in the apartment where he was arrested and where the contraband at issue was found, warnings were not required because this routine administrative question, which was part of a series of standard booking questions such as name, address, and so forth, was not designed to elicit an incriminating response (see Pennsylvania v Muniz, 496 US 582, 601-602 [1990]; People v Rodney, 85 NY2d 289, 292-294 [1995]; People v Watts, 309 AD2d 628 [1st Dept 2003], lv denied 1 NY3d 582 [2003]), even if the an | 1 | 2017–2017 |
People v. Alleyne
green
1 sentence2017When, in response to an officer’s pedigree question as to his address, defendant acknowledged he resided in the apartment where he was arrested and where the contraband at issue was found, warnings were not required because this routine administrative question, which was part of a series of standard booking questions such as name, address, and so forth, was not designed to elicit an incriminating response (see Pennsylvania v Muniz, 496 US 582, 601-602 [1990]; People v Rodney, 85 NY2d 289, 292-294 [1995]; People v Watts, 309 AD2d 628 [1st Dept 2003], lv denied 1 NY3d 582 [2003]), even if the an | 1 | 2017–2017 |
Lotysz v. Montgomery
green
1 sentence2017When, in response to an officer’s pedigree question as to his address, defendant acknowledged he resided in the apartment where he was arrested and where the contraband at issue was found, warnings were not required because this routine administrative question, which was part of a series of standard booking questions such as name, address, and so forth, was not designed to elicit an incriminating response (see Pennsylvania v Muniz, 496 US 582, 601-602 [1990]; People v Rodney, 85 NY2d 289, 292-294 [1995]; People v Watts, 309 AD2d 628 [1st Dept 2003], lv denied 1 NY3d 582 [2003]), even if the an | 1 | 2017–2017 |
Commonwealth v. Porter
green
1 sentence2016(See United States v Barton, 712 F3d 111 [2d Cir 2013] [a defendant has the burden of establishing financial eligibility for appointed counsel]; United States v Parker, 439 F3d 81 [2d Cir 2006]; People v Schupper, 353 P3d 880 [Colo Ct App 2014]; Commonwealth v Porter, 462 Mass 724, 971 NE2d 291 [2012] [holding that a defendant seeking appointment of counsel at public expense bears the burden of proving indigency by a preponder- anee of the evidence]; State v Buelow, 122 Wis 2d 465 , 363 NW2d 255 [1984].) In State v Buelow, the Wisconsin court set forth a series of factors including foremost, “ | 1 | 2016–2016 |
State v. Buelow
green
2 sentences2016(See United States v Barton, 712 F3d 111 [2d Cir 2013] [a defendant has the burden of establishing financial eligibility for appointed counsel]; United States v Parker, 439 F3d 81 [2d Cir 2006]; People v Schupper, 353 P3d 880 [Colo Ct App 2014]; Commonwealth v Porter, 462 Mass 724, 971 NE2d 291 [2012] [holding that a defendant seeking appointment of counsel at public expense bears the burden of proving indigency by a preponder- anee of the evidence]; State v Buelow, 122 Wis 2d 465 , 363 NW2d 255 [1984].) In State v Buelow, the Wisconsin court set forth a series of factors including foremost, “ 2016(See United States v Barton, 712 F3d 111 [2d Cir 2013] [a defendant has the burden of establishing financial eligibility for appointed counsel]; United States v Parker, 439 F3d 81 [2d Cir 2006]; People v Schupper, 353 P3d 880 [Colo Ct App 2014]; Commonwealth v Porter, 462 Mass 724, 971 NE2d 291 [2012] [holding that a defendant seeking appointment of counsel at public expense bears the burden of proving indigency by a preponder- anee of the evidence]; State v Buelow, 122 Wis 2d 465 , 363 NW2d 255 [1984].) In State v Buelow, the Wisconsin court set forth a series of factors including foremost, “ | 1 | 2016–2016 |
People v. Schupper
green
1 sentence2016(See United States v Barton, 712 F3d 111 [2d Cir 2013] [a defendant has the burden of establishing financial eligibility for appointed counsel]; United States v Parker, 439 F3d 81 [2d Cir 2006]; People v Schupper, 353 P3d 880 [Colo Ct App 2014]; Commonwealth v Porter, 462 Mass 724, 971 NE2d 291 [2012] [holding that a defendant seeking appointment of counsel at public expense bears the burden of proving indigency by a preponder- anee of the evidence]; State v Buelow, 122 Wis 2d 465 , 363 NW2d 255 [1984].) In State v Buelow, the Wisconsin court set forth a series of factors including foremost, “ | 1 | 2016–2016 |
United States of America, and U.S. District Court Western District of New York v. Darnyl Parker
green
1 sentence2016(See United States v Barton, 712 F3d 111 [2d Cir 2013] [a defendant has the burden of establishing financial eligibility for appointed counsel]; United States v Parker, 439 F3d 81 [2d Cir 2006]; People v Schupper, 353 P3d 880 [Colo Ct App 2014]; Commonwealth v Porter, 462 Mass 724, 971 NE2d 291 [2012] [holding that a defendant seeking appointment of counsel at public expense bears the burden of proving indigency by a preponder- anee of the evidence]; State v Buelow, 122 Wis 2d 465 , 363 NW2d 255 [1984].) In State v Buelow, the Wisconsin court set forth a series of factors including foremost, “ | 1 | 2016–2016 |
United States v. Barton
green
1 sentence2016(See United States v Barton, 712 F3d 111 [2d Cir 2013] [a defendant has the burden of establishing financial eligibility for appointed counsel]; United States v Parker, 439 F3d 81 [2d Cir 2006]; People v Schupper, 353 P3d 880 [Colo Ct App 2014]; Commonwealth v Porter, 462 Mass 724, 971 NE2d 291 [2012] [holding that a defendant seeking appointment of counsel at public expense bears the burden of proving indigency by a preponder- anee of the evidence]; State v Buelow, 122 Wis 2d 465 , 363 NW2d 255 [1984].) In State v Buelow, the Wisconsin court set forth a series of factors including foremost, “ | 1 | 2016–2016 |
People v. Gibson
green
1 sentence1993Here, there were a series of factors which escalated incrementally as the encounter evolved (see, People v Gibson, 194 AD2d 623 ). | 1 | 1993–1993 |
Opinions by the citing court's state. A doctrine retained in one state and abandoned in another shows up here as a year span that stalls.