age discrimination claim (Mississippi) · Go Syfert
← Mississippi issues

age discrimination claim in Mississippi

6 Mississippi opinions name it 2 courts 1999–2009 0 in the last five years

The cases below were cited by Mississippi courts in a sentence that names this issue. Sides come from how each citing opinion treated the case (Syfertize flag on that citation), so a case can appear on both: that is where the law is contested. A red or yellow chip is the case's own overall treatment.

Followed or applied (6)

CaseFollowedCited
40 Fair empl.prac.cas. 619, 39 Empl. Prac. Dec. P 36,035 Pruet Production Co. And Pruet Oil Company, Cross-Appellants v. Roy G. Ayles, Cross-Appelleegreen
ca5 · 1986 · cited in 4 Mississippi opinions naming this issue, 2006–2009
2 sentences

2009For instance, under the Age Discrimination in Employment Act, "before an aggrieved party can commence a civil action on an age discrimination claim he must file a charge with [the] EEOC `within 180 days after the alleged unlawful practice occurred.'" Pruet Production Co. v. Ayles, 784 F.2d 1275, 1279 (5th Cir.1986) (quoting 29 U.S.C. § 626 (d)(1)).

2009For instance, under the Age Discrimination in Employment Act, “before an aggrieved party can commence a civil action on an age discrimination claim he must file a charge with [the] EEOC ‘within 180 days after the alleged unlawful practice occurred.’ ” Pruet Production Co. v. Ayles, 784 F.2d 1275, 1279 (5th Cir.1986) (quoting 29 U.S.C. § 626 (d)(1)).

44
Joel G. PACHECO, Jr., Plaintiff-Appellant, v. Donald B. RICE, Secretary of Air Force, Et Al., Defendants-Appelleesgreen
ca5 · 1992 · cited in 2 Mississippi opinions naming this issue, 2006–2009
2 sentences

2009See also Yee v. Baldwin-Price, 325 Fed.Appx. 375 , 2009 WL 1361527 , at *2 (5th Cir. May 15, 2009) (quoting Pacheco v. Rice, 966 F.2d 904, 905 (5th Cir.1992)) ("`[f]ailure to notify the EEO counselor in [a] timely fashion may bar' the employee's claim."); Pietras v. Bd. of Fire Comm'rs of the Farmingville Fire Dist., 180 F.3d 468, 473 (2d Cir.1999) ("Title VII requires that plaintiffs file timely a charge with [the] EEOC.

2009See also Yee v. Baldwin-Price, 325 Fed.Appx. 375 , 2009 WL 1361527 , at *2 (5th Cir. May 15, 2009) (quoting Pacheco v. Rice, 966 F.2d 904, 905 (5th Cir.1992)) (“ ‘[fjailure to notify the EEO counselor in [a] timely fashion may bar’ the employee’s claim.”); Pietras v. Bd. of Fire Comm’rs of the Farmingville Fire Dist., 180 F.3d 468, 473 (2d Cir.1999) (“Title VII requires that plaintiffs file timely a charge with [the] EEOC.

22
Victoria Pietras v. Board of Fire Commissioners of the Farmingville Fire Districtgreen
ca2 · 1999 · cited in 2 Mississippi opinions naming this issue, 2006–2009
2 sentences

2009See also Yee v. Baldwin-Price, 325 Fed.Appx. 375 , 2009 WL 1361527 , at *2 (5th Cir. May 15, 2009) (quoting Pacheco v. Rice, 966 F.2d 904, 905 (5th Cir.1992)) ("`[f]ailure to notify the EEO counselor in [a] timely fashion may bar' the employee's claim."); Pietras v. Bd. of Fire Comm'rs of the Farmingville Fire Dist., 180 F.3d 468, 473 (2d Cir.1999) ("Title VII requires that plaintiffs file timely a charge with [the] EEOC.

2009See also Yee v. Baldwin-Price, 325 Fed.Appx. 375 , 2009 WL 1361527 , at *2 (5th Cir. May 15, 2009) (quoting Pacheco v. Rice, 966 F.2d 904, 905 (5th Cir.1992)) (“ ‘[fjailure to notify the EEO counselor in [a] timely fashion may bar’ the employee’s claim.”); Pietras v. Bd. of Fire Comm’rs of the Farmingville Fire Dist., 180 F.3d 468, 473 (2d Cir.1999) (“Title VII requires that plaintiffs file timely a charge with [the] EEOC.

22
Yee v. Baldwin-Pricegreen
ca5 · 2009 · cited in 1 Mississippi opinions naming this issue, 2009–2009
2 sentences

2009See also Yee v. Baldwin-Price, 325 Fed.Appx. 375 , 2009 WL 1361527 , at *2 (5th Cir. May 15, 2009) (quoting Pacheco v. Rice, 966 F.2d 904, 905 (5th Cir.1992)) ("`[f]ailure to notify the EEO counselor in [a] timely fashion may bar' the employee's claim."); Pietras v. Bd. of Fire Comm'rs of the Farmingville Fire Dist., 180 F.3d 468, 473 (2d Cir.1999) ("Title VII requires that plaintiffs file timely a charge with [the] EEOC.

2009See also Yee v. Baldwin-Price, 325 Fed.Appx. 375 , 2009 WL 1361527 , at *2 (5th Cir. May 15, 2009) (quoting Pacheco v. Rice, 966 F.2d 904, 905 (5th Cir.1992)) (“ ‘[fjailure to notify the EEO counselor in [a] timely fashion may bar’ the employee’s claim.”); Pietras v. Bd. of Fire Comm’rs of the Farmingville Fire Dist., 180 F.3d 468, 473 (2d Cir.1999) (“Title VII requires that plaintiffs file timely a charge with [the] EEOC.

11
Brown v. Inter-City Federal Bankgreen
missctapp · 1999 · cited in 1 Mississippi opinions naming this issue, 2005–2005
1 sentence

2005Id. at 265 (¶ 10). ¶ 58.

11
cluster 565157green
ca5 · 1991 · cited in 1 Mississippi opinions naming this issue, 1999–1999
1 sentence

1999Wilson v. Monarch Paper Co., 939 F.2d 1138, 1144 (5th Cir. 1991).

11

Distinguished, questioned or overruled (0)

CaseNegativeCited
No negative-treatment citations attached to this issue in Mississippi. Read the followed side critically anyway.

Statutes the citing opinions construe

MS § Miss. Code Ann. § 11-46-11 (4) USC § 29u.s.c.626 (4)

Counted by distinct opinions that both name this issue and are annotated to the section; sections every opinion cites regardless of issue are not filtered here, so read the counts against the total above.

Where else courts name it

OH 42 (1996–2024) CA 23 (1990–2026) TX 20 (1996–2025) WA 18 (1991–2017) NJ 16 (1985–2024) NY 13 (1983–2014) MI 12 (1985–2023) MA 10 (1995–2012) WV 6 (1992–2024) MS 6 (1999–2009) IA 6 (1998–2023) MO 5 (1992–2020) FL 5 (2008–2020) CO 4 (1987–2006) MN 4 (1986–2015) AZ 4 (1995–2007) KY 4 (2006–2025) RI 3 (2006–2019) WI 3 (1997–2023) HI 3 (2001–2025) DC 3 (2005–2013) PA 3 (1998–2020) NE 3 (2005–2017) TN 3 (2002–2010) OR 2 (2014–2014) CT 2 (1994–2005) MD 2 (2011–2013) OK 2 (1995–2009) VT 2 (1990–1996) ID 2 (2009–2018) NC 2 (2005–2020) ND 2 (1994–2015) MT 2 (1989–1995) IL 2 (1992–2021) AL 2 (2008–2009) LA 2 (2003–2010)

Opinions by the citing court's state. A doctrine retained in one state and abandoned in another shows up here as a year span that stalls.

← Caselaw search · G Cite Topics · Brief Check