Already have an account? Sign in instead.
You stay signed in for 30 days on this browser.
Continue with Google Continue with MicrosoftNo account yet? Create a free one.
We sent a six-digit code.
It expires in ten minutes, works once, and only in this browser. Five wrong tries void it. Send another code.
Your account is live and the Cloudflare checks are off for this browser.
6 Mississippi opinions name it 2 courts 1929–2010 0 in the last five years
The cases below were cited by Mississippi courts in a sentence that names this issue. Sides come from how each citing opinion treated the case (Syfertize flag on that citation), so a case can appear on both: that is where the law is contested. A red or yellow chip is the case's own overall treatment.
| Case | Followed | Cited |
|---|---|---|
Herrington v. Spellgreen2 sentences2004In Herrington v. Spell, 692 So.2d 93, 101 (Miss.1997), the Herringtons asserted that allowing patients of the defendant and a witness to sit on the jury constituted reversible error. 2000In Herrington v. Spell, 692 So.2d 93, 101 (Miss. 1997), the Herringtons asserted that allowing patients of the defendant and a witness to sit on the jury constituted reversible error. | 2 | 2 |
Hudson v. Taleffgreen2 sentences1997See Hudson v. Taleff, 546 So.2d 359, 363 (Miss. 1989) (holding that jury was not impartial where court refused challenges for cause of two jurors with connections to defendant doctor). 1992See Hudson v. Taleff, 546 So. 2d 359, 363 (Miss. 1989) (holding that jury was not impartial where court refused challenges for cause of two jurors with connections to defendant doctor). | 2 | 2 |
| Case | Negative | Cited |
|---|---|---|
| No negative-treatment citations attached to this issue in Mississippi. Read the followed side critically anyway. | ||
| Case | Cited | Years |
|---|---|---|
White v. State
green
1 sentence2010Williams cites to Pettit v. State, 569 So.2d 678 (Miss. 1990) and White v. State, 732 So.2d 961 (Miss.1999) in support of his argument. | 1 | 2010–2010 |
Pettit v. State
green
1 sentence2010Williams cites to Pettit v. State, 569 So.2d 678 (Miss. 1990) and White v. State, 732 So.2d 961 (Miss.1999) in support of his argument. | 1 | 2010–2010 |
Peters v. State
green
2 sentences1929Under the rules for determining the capacity of a witness to testify, as announced in the case of Peters v. State, 106 Miss. 333 , 63 So. 666 , we think that the court wias correct in the conclusion that this witness did not have the capacity to give testimony, and, having reached that conclusion, the court did all it was reqiiested to do to correct the error, by excluding the testimony and instructing the jury not to consider anything she had said, and, this being true, we do not think the examination of this witness before the jury constituted reversible error. 1929Under the rules for determining the capacity of a witness to testify, as announced in the case of Peters v. State, 106 Miss. 333 , 63 So. 666 , we think that the court wias correct in the conclusion that this witness did not have the capacity to give testimony, and, having reached that conclusion, the court did all it was reqiiested to do to correct the error, by excluding the testimony and instructing the jury not to consider anything she had said, and, this being true, we do not think the examination of this witness before the jury constituted reversible error. | 1 | 1929–1929 |
Opinions by the citing court's state. A doctrine retained in one state and abandoned in another shows up here as a year span that stalls.