listed several factors (Mississippi) · Go Syfert
← Mississippi issues

listed several factors in Mississippi

6 Mississippi opinions name it 1 courts 1984–1999 0 in the last five years

The cases below were cited by Mississippi courts in a sentence that names this issue. Sides come from how each citing opinion treated the case (Syfertize flag on that citation), so a case can appear on both: that is where the law is contested. A red or yellow chip is the case's own overall treatment.

Followed or applied (1)

CaseFollowedCited
Robert Lee Holleman v. Jack R. Duckworth and Indiana Attorney Generalgreen
ca7 · 1983 · cited in 1 Mississippi opinions naming this issue, 1984–1984
2 sentences

1984Id. at 396.

1984In Holleman v. Duckworth, 700 F.2d 391, 396 (7th Cir.1983), the court listed several factors important in determining whether a prior statement tainted a later one, including, (1) the break in time between the two statements, (2) whether the same conditions that rendered the first statement inadmissible persisted, (3) whether the defendant was given renewed Miranda warnings, and (4) whether the defendant initiated the contact with the police before making his later confession.

11

Distinguished, questioned or overruled (0)

CaseNegativeCited
No negative-treatment citations attached to this issue in Mississippi. Read the followed side critically anyway.

Also cited on this issue (1)

CaseCitedYears
Peterson v. State green
miss · 1987
2 sentences

1999Id. at 637 . ¶ 38.

1998Id. at 636 .

51992–1999

Where else courts name it

TX 7 (1991–2014) MS 6 (1984–1999) LA 5 (1985–2000) FL 5 (1971–2019) IL 4 (1993–2020) HI 4 (2001–2019) NJ 4 (1994–2008) MN 4 (1988–2013) WI 3 (1998–2008) MO 3 (1984–1993) MI 3 (2016–2017) MD 2 (2000–2007) IN 2 (2013–2026) CA 2 (2001–2021) MA 2 (1991–2005) TN 2 (1981–2009)

Opinions by the citing court's state. A doctrine retained in one state and abandoned in another shows up here as a year span that stalls.

← Caselaw search · G Cite Topics · Brief Check