four factor balancing test (Montana) · Go Syfert
← Montana issues

four factor balancing test in Montana

6 Montana opinions name it 1 courts 1977–2015 0 in the last five years

The cases below were cited by Montana courts in a sentence that names this issue. Sides come from how each citing opinion treated the case (Syfertize flag on that citation), so a case can appear on both: that is where the law is contested. A red or yellow chip is the case's own overall treatment.

Followed or applied (2)

CaseFollowedCited
State v. Collinsgreen
mont · 1978 · cited in 2 Montana opinions naming this issue, 1978–1979
2 sentences

1979See State v. Collins (1978), 178 Mont. 36 , 582 P.2d 1179 ; State v. Cassidy (1978), 176 Mont. 385 , 578 P.2d 735, 737 ; State ex rel.

1979See State v. Collins (1978), 178 Mont. 36 , 582 P.2d 1179 ; State v. Cassidy (1978), 176 Mont. 385 , 578 P.2d 735, 737 ; State ex rel.

22
State v. Ariegwegreen
mont · 2007 · cited in 1 Montana opinions naming this issue, 2015–2015
1 sentence

2015Ariegwe , ¶ 113.

11

Distinguished, questioned or overruled (0)

CaseNegativeCited
No negative-treatment citations attached to this issue in Montana. Read the followed side critically anyway.

Also cited on this issue (16)

CaseCitedYears
State v. Cassidy green
mont · 1978
2 sentences

1979See State v. Collins (1978), 178 Mont. 36 , 582 P.2d 1179 ; State v. Cassidy (1978), 176 Mont. 385 , 578 P.2d 735, 737 ; State ex rel.

1979See State v. Collins (1978), 178 Mont. 36 , 582 P.2d 1179 ; State v. Cassidy (1978), 176 Mont. 385 , 578 P.2d 735, 737 ; State ex rel.

21978–1979
Barker v. Wingo green
scotus · 1972
2 sentences

1992When analyzing alleged violations of a defendant’s Sixth Amendment right to speedy trial, this Court has adopted the four factor balancing test set out in Barker v. Wingo (1972), 407 U.S. 514, 530 , 92 S.Ct. 2182, 2192 , 33 L.Ed.2d 101, 117 .

1992When analyzing alleged violations of a defendant’s Sixth Amendment right to speedy trial, this Court has adopted the four factor balancing test set out in Barker v. Wingo (1972), 407 U.S. 514, 530 , 92 S.Ct. 2182, 2192 , 33 L.Ed.2d 101, 117 .

11992–1992
State v. Curtis green
mont · 1990
2 sentences

1992State v. Curtis (1990), 241 Mont. 288 , 787 P.2d 306 .

1992State v. Curtis (1990), 241 Mont. 288 , 787 P.2d 306 .

11992–1992
State ex rel. Thomas v. District Court neutral
mont · 1968
1 sentence

1978This Court adopted the four factor balancing test of Barker in State ex rel Thomas v. District Court, (1968), 151 Mont. 1 , 438 *389 P.2d 554.

11978–1978
State ex rel. Briceno v. District Court of the Thirteenth Judicial District ex rel. County of Yellowstone neutral
mont · 1977
1 sentence

1978Said test has been consistently applied to speedy trial questions by this Court, the most recent application being State ex rel Briceno v. District Court, (1977), 173 Mont. 516 , 568 P.2d 162 , wherein it is stated: “* * * These cases involve a sensitive balancing of four factors, in which the conduct of the prosecution and the defendant are weighed in determining whether there has been a denial of the right to a speedy trial.

11978–1978
State Ex Rel. Briceno v. DIST. CT. OF 13TH JUD. DIST. ETC. neutral
mont · 1977
1 sentence

1978Said test has been consistently applied to speedy trial questions by this Court, the most recent application being State ex rel Briceno v. District Court, (1977), 173 Mont. 516 , 568 P.2d 162 , wherein it is stated: “* * * These cases involve a sensitive balancing of four factors, in which the conduct of the prosecution and the defendant are weighed in determining whether there has been a denial of the right to a speedy trial.

11978–1978
Ricon v. Garrison green
ca4 · 1975
2 sentences

1977The state argues it has pursued the prosecution of this case with dispatch and cites several cases where delays substantially in excess of those here were held not to constitute violations of constitutional speedy trial guarantees: Barker, supra; United States v. Ewell, 383 U.S. 116 , 86 S.Ct. 773 , 15 L.Ed.2d 627 ; United States v. Lane, 5 Cir., 465 F.2d 408 ; United States v. Jones, 154 U.S.App.D.C. 211 , 475 F.2d 322 ; United States v. Skeens, 161 U.S.App.D.C. 131 , 494 F.2d 1050 ; United States v. Churchill, 1 Cir., 483 F.2d 268 ; Ricon v. Garrison, 4 Cir., 517 F.2d 628 ; United States v.

1977The state argues it has pursued the prosecution of this case with dispatch and cites several cases where delays sub: stantially in excess of those here were held not to constitute violations of constitutional speedy trial guarantees: Barker, supra; United States v. Ewell, 383 U.S. 116 , 86 S.Ct. 773 , 15 L.Ed.2d 627 ; United States v. Lane, 5 Cir., 465 F.2d 408 ; United States v. Jones, 154 U.S.App.D.C. 211 , 475 F.2d 322 ; United States v. Skeens, 161 U.S.App.D.C. 131 , 494 F.2d 1050 ; United States v. Churchill, 1 Cir., 483 F.2d 268 ; Ricon v. Garrison, 4 Cir., 517 F.2d 628 ; United States v

11977–1977
United States v. Ewell green
scotus · 1966
2 sentences

1977The state argues it has pursued the prosecution of this case with dispatch and cites several cases where delays sub: stantially in excess of those here were held not to constitute violations of constitutional speedy trial guarantees: Barker, supra; United States v. Ewell, 383 U.S. 116 , 86 S.Ct. 773 , 15 L.Ed.2d 627 ; United States v. Lane, 5 Cir., 465 F.2d 408 ; United States v. Jones, 154 U.S.App.D.C. 211 , 475 F.2d 322 ; United States v. Skeens, 161 U.S.App.D.C. 131 , 494 F.2d 1050 ; United States v. Churchill, 1 Cir., 483 F.2d 268 ; Ricon v. Garrison, 4 Cir., 517 F.2d 628 ; United States v

1977The state argues it has pursued the prosecution of this case with dispatch and cites several cases where delays sub: stantially in excess of those here were held not to constitute violations of constitutional speedy trial guarantees: Barker, supra; United States v. Ewell, 383 U.S. 116 , 86 S.Ct. 773 , 15 L.Ed.2d 627 ; United States v. Lane, 5 Cir., 465 F.2d 408 ; United States v. Jones, 154 U.S.App.D.C. 211 , 475 F.2d 322 ; United States v. Skeens, 161 U.S.App.D.C. 131 , 494 F.2d 1050 ; United States v. Churchill, 1 Cir., 483 F.2d 268 ; Ricon v. Garrison, 4 Cir., 517 F.2d 628 ; United States v

11977–1977
Constabile v. State green
oklacrimapp · 1973
1 sentence

1977The state argues it has pursued the prosecution of this case with dispatch and cites several cases where delays sub: stantially in excess of those here were held not to constitute violations of constitutional speedy trial guarantees: Barker, supra; United States v. Ewell, 383 U.S. 116 , 86 S.Ct. 773 , 15 L.Ed.2d 627 ; United States v. Lane, 5 Cir., 465 F.2d 408 ; United States v. Jones, 154 U.S.App.D.C. 211 , 475 F.2d 322 ; United States v. Skeens, 161 U.S.App.D.C. 131 , 494 F.2d 1050 ; United States v. Churchill, 1 Cir., 483 F.2d 268 ; Ricon v. Garrison, 4 Cir., 517 F.2d 628 ; United States v

11977–1977
State v. Steward green
mont · 1975
1 sentence

1977II, section 24, 1972 Montana Constitution, as well as under the United States Constitution in three principal cases: State v. Steward, supra; State ex rel.

11977–1977
Fed. Sec. L. Rep. P 93,385 United States of America v. Sidney Stein and Security Underwriting Consultants, Inc. green
ca2 · 1972
2 sentences

1977The state argues it has pursued the prosecution of this case with dispatch and cites several cases where delays substantially in excess of those here were held not to constitute violations of constitutional speedy trial guarantees: Barker, supra; United States v. Ewell, 383 U.S. 116 , 86 S.Ct. 773 , 15 L.Ed.2d 627 ; United States v. Lane, 5 Cir., 465 F.2d 408 ; United States v. Jones, 154 U.S.App.D.C. 211 , 475 F.2d 322 ; United States v. Skeens, 161 U.S.App.D.C. 131 , 494 F.2d 1050 ; United States v. Churchill, 1 Cir., 483 F.2d 268 ; Ricon v. Garrison, 4 Cir., 517 F.2d 628 ; United States v.

1977The state argues it has pursued the prosecution of this case with dispatch and cites several cases where delays sub: stantially in excess of those here were held not to constitute violations of constitutional speedy trial guarantees: Barker, supra; United States v. Ewell, 383 U.S. 116 , 86 S.Ct. 773 , 15 L.Ed.2d 627 ; United States v. Lane, 5 Cir., 465 F.2d 408 ; United States v. Jones, 154 U.S.App.D.C. 211 , 475 F.2d 322 ; United States v. Skeens, 161 U.S.App.D.C. 131 , 494 F.2d 1050 ; United States v. Churchill, 1 Cir., 483 F.2d 268 ; Ricon v. Garrison, 4 Cir., 517 F.2d 628 ; United States v

11977–1977
United States v. Harry Lane green
ca5 · 1972
2 sentences

1977The state argues it has pursued the prosecution of this case with dispatch and cites several cases where delays substantially in excess of those here were held not to constitute violations of constitutional speedy trial guarantees: Barker, supra; United States v. Ewell, 383 U.S. 116 , 86 S.Ct. 773 , 15 L.Ed.2d 627 ; United States v. Lane, 5 Cir., 465 F.2d 408 ; United States v. Jones, 154 U.S.App.D.C. 211 , 475 F.2d 322 ; United States v. Skeens, 161 U.S.App.D.C. 131 , 494 F.2d 1050 ; United States v. Churchill, 1 Cir., 483 F.2d 268 ; Ricon v. Garrison, 4 Cir., 517 F.2d 628 ; United States v.

1977The state argues it has pursued the prosecution of this case with dispatch and cites several cases where delays sub: stantially in excess of those here were held not to constitute violations of constitutional speedy trial guarantees: Barker, supra; United States v. Ewell, 383 U.S. 116 , 86 S.Ct. 773 , 15 L.Ed.2d 627 ; United States v. Lane, 5 Cir., 465 F.2d 408 ; United States v. Jones, 154 U.S.App.D.C. 211 , 475 F.2d 322 ; United States v. Skeens, 161 U.S.App.D.C. 131 , 494 F.2d 1050 ; United States v. Churchill, 1 Cir., 483 F.2d 268 ; Ricon v. Garrison, 4 Cir., 517 F.2d 628 ; United States v

11977–1977
United States v. Michael E. Jones green
cadc · 1973
2 sentences

1977The state argues it has pursued the prosecution of this case with dispatch and cites several cases where delays sub: stantially in excess of those here were held not to constitute violations of constitutional speedy trial guarantees: Barker, supra; United States v. Ewell, 383 U.S. 116 , 86 S.Ct. 773 , 15 L.Ed.2d 627 ; United States v. Lane, 5 Cir., 465 F.2d 408 ; United States v. Jones, 154 U.S.App.D.C. 211 , 475 F.2d 322 ; United States v. Skeens, 161 U.S.App.D.C. 131 , 494 F.2d 1050 ; United States v. Churchill, 1 Cir., 483 F.2d 268 ; Ricon v. Garrison, 4 Cir., 517 F.2d 628 ; United States v

1977The state argues it has pursued the prosecution of this case with dispatch and cites several cases where delays sub: stantially in excess of those here were held not to constitute violations of constitutional speedy trial guarantees: Barker, supra; United States v. Ewell, 383 U.S. 116 , 86 S.Ct. 773 , 15 L.Ed.2d 627 ; United States v. Lane, 5 Cir., 465 F.2d 408 ; United States v. Jones, 154 U.S.App.D.C. 211 , 475 F.2d 322 ; United States v. Skeens, 161 U.S.App.D.C. 131 , 494 F.2d 1050 ; United States v. Churchill, 1 Cir., 483 F.2d 268 ; Ricon v. Garrison, 4 Cir., 517 F.2d 628 ; United States v

11977–1977
United States v. Paul J. Churchill green
ca1 · 1973
2 sentences

1977The state argues it has pursued the prosecution of this case with dispatch and cites several cases where delays substantially in excess of those here were held not to constitute violations of constitutional speedy trial guarantees: Barker, supra; United States v. Ewell, 383 U.S. 116 , 86 S.Ct. 773 , 15 L.Ed.2d 627 ; United States v. Lane, 5 Cir., 465 F.2d 408 ; United States v. Jones, 154 U.S.App.D.C. 211 , 475 F.2d 322 ; United States v. Skeens, 161 U.S.App.D.C. 131 , 494 F.2d 1050 ; United States v. Churchill, 1 Cir., 483 F.2d 268 ; Ricon v. Garrison, 4 Cir., 517 F.2d 628 ; United States v.

1977The state argues it has pursued the prosecution of this case with dispatch and cites several cases where delays sub: stantially in excess of those here were held not to constitute violations of constitutional speedy trial guarantees: Barker, supra; United States v. Ewell, 383 U.S. 116 , 86 S.Ct. 773 , 15 L.Ed.2d 627 ; United States v. Lane, 5 Cir., 465 F.2d 408 ; United States v. Jones, 154 U.S.App.D.C. 211 , 475 F.2d 322 ; United States v. Skeens, 161 U.S.App.D.C. 131 , 494 F.2d 1050 ; United States v. Churchill, 1 Cir., 483 F.2d 268 ; Ricon v. Garrison, 4 Cir., 517 F.2d 628 ; United States v

11977–1977
United States v. James T. Skeens green
cadc · 1974
2 sentences

1977The state argues it has pursued the prosecution of this case with dispatch and cites several cases where delays sub: stantially in excess of those here were held not to constitute violations of constitutional speedy trial guarantees: Barker, supra; United States v. Ewell, 383 U.S. 116 , 86 S.Ct. 773 , 15 L.Ed.2d 627 ; United States v. Lane, 5 Cir., 465 F.2d 408 ; United States v. Jones, 154 U.S.App.D.C. 211 , 475 F.2d 322 ; United States v. Skeens, 161 U.S.App.D.C. 131 , 494 F.2d 1050 ; United States v. Churchill, 1 Cir., 483 F.2d 268 ; Ricon v. Garrison, 4 Cir., 517 F.2d 628 ; United States v

1977The state argues it has pursued the prosecution of this case with dispatch and cites several cases where delays sub: stantially in excess of those here were held not to constitute violations of constitutional speedy trial guarantees: Barker, supra; United States v. Ewell, 383 U.S. 116 , 86 S.Ct. 773 , 15 L.Ed.2d 627 ; United States v. Lane, 5 Cir., 465 F.2d 408 ; United States v. Jones, 154 U.S.App.D.C. 211 , 475 F.2d 322 ; United States v. Skeens, 161 U.S.App.D.C. 131 , 494 F.2d 1050 ; United States v. Churchill, 1 Cir., 483 F.2d 268 ; Ricon v. Garrison, 4 Cir., 517 F.2d 628 ; United States v

11977–1977
United States v. Ernest Fairchild green
ca7 · 1976
2 sentences

1977The state argues it has pursued the prosecution of this case with dispatch and cites several cases where delays substantially in excess of those here were held not to constitute violations of constitutional speedy trial guarantees: Barker, supra; United States v. Ewell, 383 U.S. 116 , 86 S.Ct. 773 , 15 L.Ed.2d 627 ; United States v. Lane, 5 Cir., 465 F.2d 408 ; United States v. Jones, 154 U.S.App.D.C. 211 , 475 F.2d 322 ; United States v. Skeens, 161 U.S.App.D.C. 131 , 494 F.2d 1050 ; United States v. Churchill, 1 Cir., 483 F.2d 268 ; Ricon v. Garrison, 4 Cir., 517 F.2d 628 ; United States v.

1977The state argues it has pursued the prosecution of this case with dispatch and cites several cases where delays sub: stantially in excess of those here were held not to constitute violations of constitutional speedy trial guarantees: Barker, supra; United States v. Ewell, 383 U.S. 116 , 86 S.Ct. 773 , 15 L.Ed.2d 627 ; United States v. Lane, 5 Cir., 465 F.2d 408 ; United States v. Jones, 154 U.S.App.D.C. 211 , 475 F.2d 322 ; United States v. Skeens, 161 U.S.App.D.C. 131 , 494 F.2d 1050 ; United States v. Churchill, 1 Cir., 483 F.2d 268 ; Ricon v. Garrison, 4 Cir., 517 F.2d 628 ; United States v

11977–1977

Where else courts name it

MT 6 (1977–2015) MD 5 (1978–2020) CT 3 (2021–2024) MO 2 (1985–1987) TX 2 (2015–2015)

Opinions by the citing court's state. A doctrine retained in one state and abandoned in another shows up here as a year span that stalls.

← Caselaw search · G Cite Topics · Brief Check